Funniest

We are talking about top here, not mediocre at best or better than average MM, no?

 

RBC P&U group is very strong and arguably top 1 or 2 in the bank. Arguably top 5 on the street. Competes with tier 1 banks on mandates 

There’s 2 rainmakers that generate most of the deal flow, one in NY and one in Houston (Apparently this guy is the co-head and BSD of the group) There’s a infra MD that’s good but is mediocre compared to rest of the street

They added a co-head in NY from MS P&U but hear he’s the lowest performer in the group 

Very VP heavy with few being super duchy and hard to work with 

Most of the associates in the group are clueless and take a back seat to the analyst, they’re few who are really good that get most of the live deal work

Pros:

MDs and Ds are very down to earth and approachable

As an analyst you gain very good technical skill set since modeling is done within the group 

Good exit ops to infra funds 

Very good deal flow and most of the juniors work on live deals 

Cons:

Hours in this group are the worse in the bank given deal flow

If you get staffed with a bad associate, you’re both analyst and associate (Can be a good thing sometimes)

Understaffed with analyst given most leave for infra funds

If you’re an analyst or intern considering group placement, go to this group get a deal under your belt from one of the rainmakers and go recruit. 

NO
 

What do you think of exit ops of RBC P&U vs RBC M&A (both NY)? I know they're both top groups in the bank but seems P&U has a good reputation across the street. RBC M&A idk much about other than the fact they're one of the best groups in the bank. Think they'd have similar exit ops? 

 

Are you really an Analyst 2? This is the level of comment I would expect from an intern or maybe an Analyst 1

1a. league tables for power/infra (especially by deal size) are absolutely not indicative of deal flow or a good IB experience pre-buy side, the main reason being that asset sales are very frequent and re subsequently often undisclosed 

1b. Fee card for asset sales typically trade at a discount to corporate so for that reason, bigger BBs who have the ability to flex financing options via LevFin or providing LCs, etc, often choose to focus on winning larger platform or portfolio deals

1c. Bigger is certainly not better in regards to platform or asset sales, in fact if you want to move to the buy side (obvious portals would be infra or energy-focused funds), these funds are largely MM and single-asset focused (MF infra/energy investing strategies are often MM-sized pockets of capital); only the very largest groups like GIP/MIRA for Riverstone/ECP have the funds and return thresholds requisite for big platforms - you will never see banks like Scotia for instance on the top for league tables but they have a lot of deal flow with smaller asset sales. In fact many PE buyers frequently don't even participate / see-through auctions as they are often priced out

2. the OP also asked for renewables, and there are very few assets of scale in this sector on the market - I have never seen a BB or Evercore advise on a noteworthy renewables asset deal (similarly, there are some banks that are renewables-focused like Marathon, and it would be extremely misleading to singularly qualify M&A group quality broadly with league tables via deal size where conventional energy plays have historically been larger)

3. If you take some time and go to Sparkspread and go through deals you feel are interesting, you'll probably see a recurring pattern of banks. Or if you're like me or likely some of the other posters here, and you've been working for a while, you know the banks in the space you compete against, and have a winning/losing record vs

 

Anybody have information on Barclays Project Finance/Infrastructure group? Is it housed in the Public Finance division or M&A?

 

Boutiques Marathon and CohnReznick they get some good mandates for renewables.

Canadians it's the usual suspects but CIBC has gotten most of the large sell side mandates of late for renewables.

Macq you're looking at doing a lot of stuff with MIRA which may or may not be interesting that's obviously a massive platform.

Other than that tend to see Barclays play more in the P3 space.

 

I know recently they advised Whiting on the Whiting / Oasis merger. $5bn deal. Their Houston energy group probably did this. Citi was on the other end.

 

Not sure about the US but the London team has been doing very well. Lead advisors on EQT / InstaVolt and Macquarie / National Grid recently. Most deals I've seen them do is on the sponsor side though.

 

Eum vel amet omnis quia assumenda consequatur quibusdam. Enim ducimus illo sequi qui. Qui dicta itaque consequatur iusto rem sed. Ipsum vero veritatis delectus est tenetur dolor fugiat. Alias consequatur libero eveniet voluptatum. Necessitatibus odit porro laudantium eos qui labore quia.

Hic ratione laborum hic natus enim eaque. Placeat facilis ut excepturi quas distinctio qui. Et quasi labore aspernatur repellat dolores tenetur omnis.

Et tenetur consequatur provident laborum enim. Laudantium accusamus ipsum debitis officiis ullam. Harum aut delectus quia ut fugit temporibus.

 

Vel magni velit consequuntur dolor nam rerum temporibus. Doloremque molestiae quidem non dolorem. Quisquam animi tempore voluptatem aut inventore est fugit.

Sequi beatae voluptatem asperiores exercitationem sit. Rerum cumque doloribus rem et maxime assumenda voluptatem. Hic saepe explicabo quia officia autem inventore. Vel enim qui ullam debitis tenetur quia voluptatem labore. Nobis blanditiis fuga molestias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”