59 Comments
 

This unironically, best purchase I made in 2022.

Isaiah_53_5 💎🙌💎🙌💎 also a fan and is our resident fitness messiah so if it's good enough for him, it's good enough for us mortals.

Reminds me of the Arnold quote: "A well built physique is a status symbol. It reflects you worked hard for it, no money can buy it." If the watch motivates you to get after it, it's a helpful tool, and building perhaps the best status symbol beyond anything you can put on your wrist.

Be excellent to each other, and party on, dudes.
 

The upside of the whoop is you never have to take it off to charge (you charge a charger that clips onto it) so you get great sleep data 
 

Downside is the whoop HR monitor is not very accurate and you only get HR stats (although they do get translated into interesting and easily digestible data, whoop UI is great). SaaS pricing is annoying too. 
 

Doubt the accuracy of HR monitor matters for 90% of people but it is limited in what it shows you, especially if you’re trying to track running/biking 

 

Really debating getting one. If you had to sell it to me what would the selling points be. I lift/workout everyday

 

I used a Whoop for ~2 years and then got rid of it recently (came w/ 6 months free then got maybe like 6 months of free membership from referrals, so only paid for a year or so). 

It was fun to see all my stats and not having to take it off to charge was great, and I didn't care about it not having a screen since I wear regular watches normally. But after a while the insights you get really aren't that new or interesting anymore, and yeah $30 / mo felt like just a waste of money. Hate how everything has to be a subscription nowadays. Fitbit at least you can use normally w/o some features if you don't pay for a premium sub.

You'll also def need to get at least 1 other band since your strap will start to smell like ass after a while, and you'll want to have a different one on hand while you wash / clean it.

 

Watch collecting is a journey and not always a linear path.  Some collect from the same brand. Some go vintage.   And it depends how much you wanna spend relative to income. 

Apple Watch is a Good watch for optics at all level… 

An:  Omega Speedie/ Tudor bb/ Breitling Navitimer(I’m partial to the blue) 

As: Rolex explorer 2, gmt , sub 

VP: AP Roo/ PP Aquanaut 

MD: FP Journe / PP nautilus (but not at resale prices) 

 
ChrisQQ

Watch collecting is a journey and not always a linear path.  Some collect from the same brand. Some go vintage.   And it depends how much you wanna spend relative to income. 

Apple Watch is a Good watch for optics at all level… 

An:  Omega Speedie/ Tudor bb/ Breitling Navitimer(I'm partial to the blue) 

As: Rolex explorer 2, gmt , sub 

VP: AP Roo/ PP Aquanaut 

MD: FP Journe / PP nautilus (but not at resale prices) 

Ah yes, the ROO - the watch so gaudily designed (befitting of a 22 year old designer I guess), that even the legendary original designer of the Royal Oak hated it.  

 
ChrisQQ

Watch collecting is a journey and not always a linear path.  Some collect from the same brand. Some go vintage.   And it depends how much you wanna spend relative to income. 

Apple Watch is a Good watch for optics at all level… 

An:  Omega Speedie/ Tudor bb/ Breitling Navitimer(I'm partial to the blue) 

As: Rolex explorer 2, gmt , sub 

VP: AP Roo/ PP Aquanaut 

MD: FP Journe / PP nautilus (but not at resale prices) 

- expand -

Ah yes, the ROO - the watch so gaudily designed (befitting of a 22 year old designer I guess), that even the legendary original designer of the Royal Oak hated it.  

Hopefully they mean RO, even then not my favorite, but 100x better than the ROO. 

 

I think a SS AP is the perfect VP watch. However, the watch market is so inflated you could have bought a stainless steel AP ROO 5 years ago for just under $20,000, but now if people see you wearing one they might assume you spent $50,000+ on the watch (those who follow the watch market). I absolutely would not pay 2x retail for a watch and I figure most VPs wouldn't either (assuming they're using their income to buy it and don't already come from wealth)

 

Maybe I’m not a baller as you guys. But what kind of Vp spends 50% of their after tax bonus on a watch??pp nautilus??

I’ve been a vp for a couple of years now and I’m comfortable but by no means dropping $25k without thinking about it.

 

This. As an analyst I wanted to buy a place, as an associate I wanted to renovate my place and buy a ring, and as a VP I have a wife and a kid. So much I’d rather spend $$ on before I drop $25 to $50k on a watch. 
 

FWIW, at my bank there’s a negative correlation between $$ of watch and how people view you. A Rolex sure but you roll into the office with a PP and you can bet you’re going to catch some shit. 

 

Analyst at a BB and I've seen very little correlation between watches and seniority, some second year analysts and associates wear Rolexes, Cartiers, etc, and some MDs wear only Apple watches and Casios, although some wear more lowkey Rolexes likes datejusts. It really depends on individual preference. I would say other than Rolex, people really aren't able to discern different watch brands and their price / status unless they're actually into watches, especially for more niche brands and I don't think it's frowned upon. There is one senior widely known for having a ridiculous watch collection (probably $1mm+) who does get memed though

 

Brietling Colt - ~$3,000

Basic Breitling: Reviewing the New-Look Breitling Colt | WatchTime - USA's  No.1 Watch Magazine

Breitling Colt 44 Blue Clearance, SAVE 57% - stmichaelgirard.com

Edit: Can one of you watch snobs explain to me why the above isn't sick? I'm catching monkey shit like a zookeeper rn. Just kinda curious what isn't to love about a classic, chrono Breitling.  

 

Interesting. I like heavy metal on my wrist, the ultra thin/simple/perfectly round face watches with small little leather/rubber bands just do nothing for me. But then again I'm a big body. Some might even say an absolute unit...

 

Didn't throw MS, but IMO it will be tough to pull off unless you're a hefty guy - a 44mm case diameter with a 22mm lug width will fit large on most wrists. The size also makes it less versatile, and probably will look out of place with more formal attire. I'm not sure if it's just the picture (I haven't inspected this watch in detail IRL), but the detailing seems off and doesn't match the price point, especially if you look at the bezel - the markings and #s just don't convey detailed craftsmanship. The uneven links (none are parallel?) on the bracelet are also really odd to me. Most won't care, but at that price point you can find some nice in-house movements, whereas the Colt uses ETA and has a pretty short power reserve as well.

Unoriginal choice, but at that price point I'd probably just get the original BB58

TUDOR Black Bay Fifty-Eight watch - m79030n-0001 | TUDOR Watch

The Tudor Black Bay 2021, the complete guide and price list

 

Yeee, I dig that. My buddies got one of the BB joints. I wear the below and get a ton of compliments on it. People tell me it is very "me" but I guess the watch nerds have been silently laughing at me all this time /: 

Revue Thommen Airspeed XLarge Chronograph Automatic Silver Dial Men's Watch 16071.6128 - 546x546

 

While I have no issue with ostentatious motives being the driving factor for a luxury purchase, you're doing yourself a massive disservice by buying anything that you don't love. Your income sets the boundaries for what's within reach, but shouldn't dictate the attributes of a watch that you fall in love with (unless you're into sophisticated complications, but doubtful based on the question at hand). Associating title / income with a watch "bracket" is an extremely slippery slope - it's an accessory (read: 100% discretionary), and as your title / comp climbs it's highly likely that your taste in luxury will scale too, often disproportionately. I appreciate I'm making pretty broad assumptions here, but I've seen too many real-world examples to not chime in.

Now regarding your question, most of the suggestions in this thread / the other watch thread are laughable - either way too expensive relative to income, or just won't work in an office setting. What's your ideal case / dial / lug-to-lug size? Are you looking for an everyday wear, something sporty, or something classy? Budget range? What complications are you looking for (date, chronograph, GMT, moonphase, perpetual calendar, etc.)? In-house or 3rd party movement? Bracelet or strap? 

All of the above criteria should be considered when choosing a watch, and unless you have an answer for all of them you got some homework to do. Your answers may also eliminate many of the suggestions posed above (candidly, I find it hilarious how people can make suggestions not knowing your preferences). What may look good on one person might look terrible elsewhere, depending on the wrist size / occasion. The biggest waste of money is spending 10k+ on something that you didn't fall in love with, or know the first thing about and only made the purchase to impress.

 

This is the right answer. Watches are personal, and the “best” watch for person A won’t be the same as person B. Find the things you love about watches and then strive to get that. As this poster says, that will also evolve over time, and if you go down the watch rabbit hole you’ll realize there is a ton of cool stuff. 

 

Ipsam in ut tenetur reiciendis modi ex. Corporis aperiam nihil et ea et. Dolores ex reiciendis impedit voluptates magnam aperiam.

Omnis suscipit quia modi. Tempore quasi voluptatem nam dignissimos sequi. Aspernatur perspiciatis quas ut quibusdam debitis. Cumque voluptatum voluptatem aut accusamus quia est nemo. Exercitationem aut dolore vel voluptatem distinctio.

Amet maiores magnam expedita pariatur nulla neque atque tempore. Est optio voluptas quisquam magnam explicabo illum velit. Aut molestias tempore illo velit non eum suscipit.

 

Debitis quos optio nam modi nemo. Eligendi sit amet est numquam ducimus aut commodi.

Numquam aut temporibus voluptatibus autem omnis praesentium dolorem. Aut commodi necessitatibus aut qui sit perferendis quis. Autem nobis exercitationem dolorum mollitia qui consequuntur et optio. Non labore sapiente sit non voluptates aut ut. Magnam est et at dolorem quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (45) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”