Getting Better at PE Case Studies
I've been through a few PE recruiting processes for the associate level and the qualitative case study rounds have always seemed to be my bottle neck. Wanted to hear some advice from experienced PE professionals and those who do well on PE case studies.
I have the basics down (Porter's Forces, operating leverage, unit economics, etc.) and can articulate my analysis of a business quite well, but a feedback I've gotten was that I lacked the ability to think out of the box and come up with a differentiated thesis on the business to demonstrate my investor mindset, and instead it felt like I was simply summarizing the pros & cons of the investment off of a mental checklist of items.
Or to break down my issue further, I think my weakness lies in being able to build upon my investment highlights / risks to formulate a thoughtful, differentiated investment thesis.
For example, my investment thesis always goes like this: "Even though Company XYZ has Merits A & B, we recommend passing on this investment opportunity due to Risk A, Risk B, and Risk C."
I've had trouble explaining qualitatively why the risks outweigh the merits, or vice versa, since you're not making investment decisions off of simply a quantitative score sheet / checklist. Any advice here would be appreciated.
Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are some strategies to improve your performance in PE case studies and develop a more differentiated investment thesis:
Join Q&A Calls with the Buy-Side:
Case Study Style Extraction:
Framework for Investment Thesis:
Focus on Specific Value Creation Actions:
Think Critically About Assumptions:
Practice with Real-World Diligence:
Use a Structured Approach:
Leverage Resources:
By incorporating these strategies, you can enhance your ability to think out of the box and develop a more thoughtful, differentiated investment thesis.
Sources: PE professional, what's your process while judging an investment?, PE professional, what's your process while judging an investment?, How to learn to evaluate investment? (PE case study interview), PE Case Study 48h, Q&A: European PE Professional
You seem to be thinking about it correctly - focusing on the unit economics of a business, its competitive advantages, building a thesis for it. For a case study, you don't really have to have a differentiated investment thesis but just need to show case that you can think through the business at a high-level given you have limited time / domain expertise. You also make it sound like you are passing - even if you disagree with the investment, I would structure case studies as all opportunities to bid and would word the memo that you submit as "Recommend submitting IOI at X multiple off of X EBITDA with potential thesis points of 1, 2, 3, 4 and key risks to diligence of 1, 2, 3, 4." In terms of the deliverable, this is how I would submit:
And when discussing the investment thesis, I would word it in the case study like here is my hypothesis and here is what I need to confirm. I.e., if industry is growing 10%+ and business is growing 5%+, there is opportunity to accelerate volumetric growth but need to understand strategy around this (do we have to invest in a sales force, do they have the right products, what are customers saying and why have they not been in line with market growth, is the business near capacity and we need to invest in additional capacity).
And then you do the opposite for risks. 3-4 key risks that you need to get comfortable with and explain HOW you will get comfortable. I.e., business is a smaller player in a large market with bigger competition. Well mitigant could be they serve a specific niche, this creates room to be more agile vs. competitors. Or a risk being execution around around building a facility for capacity expansion. Mitigant would be you as a sponsor can bring value here, management has laid out clear plan but need to diligence further, they've backfilled capacity with existing customers, etc.
Just some ideas..... Good luck!!!
Having reviewed these , just make sure the graphs look nice and the logos and titles are aligned.
The content nobody reads as much , just don’t have any outlandish assumptions and should be a cakewalk
Aut iusto accusamus sint est libero consequatur aliquid. Suscipit recusandae et et velit. Nihil sunt dolores ut quia ut quia necessitatibus.
Rem accusamus similique sit assumenda quaerat et. Numquam est velit sequi quasi minima. Ea consequuntur labore dignissimos nostrum quo nihil adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Voluptatum sequi laboriosam maxime rerum mollitia. Nemo a ipsam odio sit illum. Beatae atque enim natus qui magni. Ea ex dolores officia architecto hic est. Aspernatur rerum deleniti in quod. Quis in beatae voluptatem inventore impedit.
In itaque doloribus quis. Eum optio ut accusantium est commodi molestiae quis odio.