14 Comments
 

It takes no time to do it right, why take shortcuts? Just model the three statements so that you an have a better notion of how much debt can the company hold.

Otherwise just get the IS check maximum leverage you can put in (4-5x EBITDA) and model the debt

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 
HFIt takes no time to do it right, why take shortcuts? Just model the three statements so that you an have a better notion of how much debt can the company hold.

Otherwise just get the IS check maximum leverage you can put in (4-5x EBITDA) and model the debt

He's likely asking for the purpose of a modeling test, it takes a shit ton more time to build a fully integrated than a short form, and those things are stressful so the question definitely makes sense. As far as it giving you a better notion of how much debt the company could hold, how exactly would the fully integrated do that when the short form wouldn't? The whole point is to get to your sensitivities so that you can see what your returns are... you can do that with a short form.

 

I think anonymous_analyst pretty much hit the nail on the head - that's the way to do it and do it quickly.

"A strong man cannot help a weaker unless that weaker is willing to be helped, and even the weak man must become strong of himself; he must, by his own efforts, develop the strength which he admires in another. None but himself can alter his condition."
 

I am may be seing this wrong, but if you don't model the 3 statements how can we be sure that the company has enough cash to pay interest (I am refering to company level debt not SPV debt)?

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 
HFI am may be seing this wrong, but if you don't model the 3 statements how can we be sure that the company has enough cash to pay interest (I am refering to company level debt not SPV debt)?

Your debt schedule would tell you how much cash interest the company would have to pay - that would flow into your IS.

"A strong man cannot help a weaker unless that weaker is willing to be helped, and even the weak man must become strong of himself; he must, by his own efforts, develop the strength which he admires in another. None but himself can alter his condition."
 
FBI_34
HFI am may be seing this wrong, but if you don't model the 3 statements how can we be sure that the company has enough cash to pay interest (I am refering to company level debt not SPV debt)?

Your debt schedule would tell you how much cash interest the company would have to pay - that would flow into your IS.

But for that you need the CF Statement to tell you if you have cash to pay them, right?

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 
Best Response
HF
FBI_34
HFI am may be seing this wrong, but if you don't model the 3 statements how can we be sure that the company has enough cash to pay interest (I am refering to company level debt not SPV debt)?

Your debt schedule would tell you how much cash interest the company would have to pay - that would flow into your IS.

But for that you need the CF Statement to tell you if you have cash to pay them, right?

You just need the income statement, assumptions on Capex, Dept, WC and your debt schedule.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

But how do balance the BS then? Via capital raisings? I usually reserved that only for Banking / Insurance companies since tier ratios and such tell you the "exact" minimum capital requirements

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 
HFBut how do balance the BS then? Via capital raisings? I usually reserved that only for Banking / Insurance companies since tier ratios and such tell you the "exact" minimum capital requirements

There is no BS, hence the short form. It's purely a tool to gauge, on a quick and dirty basis, the targets capacity to carry debt and indicative returns.

"After you work on Wall Street it’s a choice, would you rather work at McDonalds or on the sell-side? I would choose McDonalds over the sell-side.” - David Tepper
 

Just a clarification: I did my fare share of short modelling and for quick & dirty results it works.

That said, even though I don't use DCF anymore (the buyside is great), I am a strong advocate of full models sinc ethey will actually allow to have a better view of the impact of your assumptions.

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com
 

Just to clarify, no one is saying you don't need COMPONENTS of the SCF and BS to do a quick and dirty LBO, just that you don't need the whole thing. Just do a combined "short-form" IS / SCF that goes Rev - Cash Costs = EBITDA - Interest - Cash Taxes (take into account D&A, interest, etc.) - Capex - Change in WC = FCF. Then create a debt schedule and calculate your ending period debt and cash balances.

No one cares about cash flow from financing, the equity account, the PP&E balance, etc. since it doesn't affect the IRR in a simple LBO.

anonymous_analyst has it right.

 

Libero quas alias ea. Et magnam laborum qui id mollitia est. Laborum sit commodi consequuntur dolor.

Voluptates autem sit sunt assumenda possimus et natus vitae. Eaque velit sed voluptas cupiditate nihil dolorem. Autem dolorem tenetur vel quia.

Velit quia quo eius culpa omnis numquam. Maxime molestias iste officia ut aliquam doloribus. Quia minima amet vero quia cupiditate fugiat.

Commodi voluptas itaque non sit et. Iusto sunt iure sit qui optio. Delectus adipisci nostrum beatae. Et adipisci labore assumenda quae nam aut ut ut.

absolutearbitrageur.blogspot.com

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”