Any of y’all getting deals done?

Checking in now that Q1 2026 is basically done. Curious to hear from everyone what you’re seeing today and what deals/how many deals you’re working on today, and market coverage.

We have a multifamily deal that will close soon (Sunbelt; core plus) but otherwise it’s been pretty slim pickings for what we’ve found interesting.

Our background:
Multifamily, core plus/value-add across the Sunbelt. Capitalized through our balance sheet

31 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, the multifamily market has been experiencing some challenges recently. Deals are falling out as some major landlords are struggling to price risk appropriately, leading to dropped deals rather than retrades. Teams are also taking a cautious approach, going "pencils down" for a few weeks to assess the market conditions.

However, there are still opportunities in the Sunbelt region, which remains attractive due to its low state income tax rates, lower costs of living, high job growth, and favorable demographics. Markets like Phoenix, Dallas, Austin, and Orlando are highlighted as strong performers, particularly for core plus and value-add strategies. These areas benefit from good weather, a highly educated population, and strong economic fundamentals.

If you're closing a multifamily deal in the Sunbelt, you're likely tapping into one of the more resilient markets. While the overall deal flow might be slower, focusing on off-market opportunities or conservatively underwritten deals could help maintain momentum.

Sources: What Markets and Core sub markets do you think will experience rapid growth over the next 3-5 years ?, Development vs Acquisitions Lifestyle, Great Deals You've Recently Done, Multifamily Deals are Starting to Fall Out, Q&A:New Real Estate Development Shop

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Deals are plodding along in development. We have some STNL deals we're doing with nationals and regional users. Grocers are signing deals all over our market, we inked one for one of our sites. Other than that, it looks like residential development is picking up a bit as well. Looking to deliver most of these deals late 2026/early 2027. I'm in the southeast for reference.

 

On the multifamily side in the Sun Belt people are doing deals but they are doing them for fees and/or to recoup pre-dev spend. Acquisitions don't make sense because cap rates are still way too low relative to interest rates and forward rent growth. And you can buy brand new stuff right at replacement cost so that should tell you something about the actual yields on new development.

 

Thats interesting. Would love to hear more about why the high demand. Did it hit all together or are there some one time events causing this spike in demand?

Array
 

I mean like anything, it's multiple factors: Valuations are still, for the most part, below replacement value, demand is continuing to grow with an aging population, and operators are pushing rent growth closer to 4-5% with very little pushback. So capital is looking to partner with established operators and get in at an attractive basis. 

Large players like Welltower have obviously been doing this for a while, but institutional exposure to senior living is still a pretty small allocation in most funds. I think it's being viewed as a hedge and a diversification play within broader housing fund strategies.

 
Most Helpful

wallherder

I mean like anything, it's multiple factors: Valuations are still, for the most part, below replacement value, demand is continuing to grow with an aging population, and operators are pushing rent growth closer to 4-5% with very little pushback. So capital is looking to partner with established operators and get in at an attractive basis. 

Large players like Welltower have obviously been doing this for a while, but institutional exposure to senior living is still a pretty small allocation in most funds. I think it's being viewed as a hedge and a diversification play within broader housing fund strategies.

I agree with this.  As an operator, we’ve helped two developments with capital commitments get done in March (close to $500MM total capitalization).  Both projects near areas where the median net worth (however you calculate it), with a 4% annual distribution on their retirement portfolio for the senior citizen, would cover the $10,000+ base rent.  And, they don’t have to sell their house.  This is benefiting the rental model especially (compared to traditional CCRC buy-in models).  This is the bedrock of this investment thesis.

Senior housing is a hedge against broader disruptions in the employment market that affect other asset classes more.  Plus, the number of 85+ year olds quadrupling from 2000 to 2040, the Silver Tsunami is reaching shore. We have been able to increase rents, especially when headlines telegraph inflation, and the need to maintain service quality. 

Have compassion as well as ambition and you’ll go far in life. I am interested in digital immortality. Check out my blog at digitalimmortality.com
 

Not in MF, but in sunbelt for deal size of >$50M mixed use.

Deals are happening but slow for reasons below.

Sellers who purchased pre-covid don’t want to realize any losses. If they have enough capital to continue, they will hold until they sell at or decently above their pre-covid acquisition price. They’ve already been in the deal for 5+ years and they’re not going to throw that all away to make zero promote. They’d rather double down and gamble on better conditions a few years down the road.

Lenders: They are hard to get good terms from. Even well capitalized and experience sponsors are still getting expensive debt. It’s not as bad as it was maybe 3 years ago, but effective interest rates are still 7-8% easily.

Distressed Sellers: Whether it’s a lender driven sale or an owner who is cash strapped and is pressure to exit the investment. Nobody is willing to sell for “cheap”. There are lots of rumors and ideas from simpletons whose strategy is “let’s just buy distressed CMBS assets or loans with upcoming maturity!” Yeah, good luck with that. I see deals with $90 million in defaulted debt that should sell for let’s say $50-60 million to the market. Nobody is willing to eat that $20-30 million loss though. They would rather extend the loan another 3 years.

Winning Bidders: On deals that are traditionally marketed, I’ve been noticing a lot of the groups who are successful in outbidding let’s say 5-10 other offers are ones who have long time horizons and less required returns. Typically they are HNW family offices or syndications with 7-10 year horizons and modest return expectations. If you are targeting 2x multiples and 30% IRR returns, don’t expect to win many bids.

LPs: Most institutional LPs have unrealistic expectations. They want to buy at a super low basis, make double digit CoC returns, put in little capital to lease or renovate, and flip the asset quickly. I want whatever those Ivy League guys are smoking, because they may have better luck just buying Powerball tickets.

It’s really a combination of underwater sellers who won’t sell for a giant loss, buyers who only want to buy at rock bottom pricing, expensive cost of capital, and the winners are private family offices who can move quick and play the long game. Generally could be described as gridlock. This may not be the case in NYC or LA though, or for all deals.

 

Is it the LPs that are unrealistic or the sellers? The LP's are investing funds across a variety of verticals and currently finding that the risk-reward of real estate right now isn't justified compared to their alternatives. Real estate used to be a cash flow game that turned into a quick flip appreciate game in the last decade, but now that the musical chairs have stopped the investors want cash flow again and being called unrealistic because sellers are used to the 2010's. They'd prefer not to get many deals done and move that capital somewhere else if they can't find what they want here. 

 

Doing some small club deals in Europe focused on senior living (c. 5 m€ per deal), addressing particularly desperate sellers and repositioning assets for institutional investors.

 

Just looked at a Manhattan resi deal. Valuation’s high and is still in fixer-upper mode. Waiting for prices to be more attractive and current ownership to take better care of their asset before putting my own money to work in the deal 

 

Not really. Have been close on a few things past 6mo and have a few deals we are going for now, so maybe something will work out soon


Went to a broker happy hour a couple weeks ago. One of the larger regional players is in asset management mode and has pushed off renovations on most deals as they aren’t yielding the premiums intended. A mid size developer had just done layoffs the day before, I was chatting with a former employee who said they have 0 in the pipeline 

Can only think of one group in my markets who I would say is currently really active. We look at most of the same deals though and I’m scratching my head at some of their purchases 

 

At ullam magnam quis. Quia magni explicabo doloremque est maxime dolor sequi. Cupiditate laudantium iusto illo sapiente. Esse aut repudiandae ipsa voluptatum minus.

Sed et sit voluptas voluptate consequuntur. Voluptatem enim quidem eius harum consequuntur. Qui optio omnis modi aut.

Labore error quia sunt. Vel deleniti sunt alias quos aliquid natus. Nemo dignissimos quo quos. Sit aperiam magni sit eligendi debitis vel. In voluptate eaque nihil earum. Consequuntur voluptas voluptate odit beatae necessitatibus et.

 

Culpa quod fugit architecto minus voluptatem. Et et impedit voluptas quidem dicta voluptatibus magnam. Beatae qui deleniti quasi rem. Ut est impedit voluptate. Enim neque et tempora qui omnis sint quam. Non magnam molestiae autem qui aut magni.

Est voluptas facilis enim. Minus laboriosam sequi dicta illum atque officiis.

Quam provident quasi dolor aut officiis inventore est. Illum quibusdam deserunt eius veritatis enim doloremque. Vitae assumenda distinctio ratione dolores laboriosam.

Et quod nesciunt quisquam voluptas. Occaecati nesciunt quas quibusdam eaque enim. Fugit dolores tempora voluptas commodi. Commodi eum repellat assumenda provident voluptatem dignissimos. Error nam vitae est dolores itaque repellat. Enim iure fuga perspiciatis eum omnis. Placeat eum voluptas mollitia sit perspiciatis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (67) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”