What are some small shops that absolutely crush returns?
Curious to know some smaller LPs and GPs that have stellar track records but are off most people’s radars
Trending Content - Real Estate Forum
| +65 | PERE 100/200 | 10 | 19h |
| +18 | Quitting REPE - thoughts on pivoting out of CRE? | 2 | 21m |
| +16 | Acquisitions Experience Needed? | 7 | 2d |
| +13 | Hyper-scale Data Center Operator Analyst | 4 | 21h |
| Would You Buy an Empty Commercial Building or One With Existing Tenants? | 1 | 23h | |
| +10 | Blackstone RE AM? | 11 | 1d |
| +10 | Nuveen Associate Case Study | 6 | 1d |
| +10 | Life Time / Six Flags Real Estate Roles? | 6 | 21h |
| +9 | Cambridge MPhil Real Estate Finance: Are Graduates Still Staying in the UK? | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Debt Originations Comp Structure? | 0 | 2h |
Career Resources
Tides Equities
Stripmallguy
I think it would be very difficult to know a small shop’s average returns and be able to definitively say that they’re crushing it compared to other small shops’ returns that you also don’t really know. Not exactly public knowledge here and perception can be deceptive.
Hence the question
The reality in today's world is that markets are so efficient that hitting high returns is mostly timing of the market. Choosing your shop is basically deciding who isn't going to f up the execution for you. Put another way, I don't think there are many shops that are driving significantly superior returns from some sort of special sauce. It's more so avoiding the negligent groups that do a bad job and kill your deal, or syndicators working for fees and convincing dumb money to ride along.
I'd say this is true besides some of the smaller shops focusing on very tertiary markets.. still some value to be had if you know what you're doing.
Honestly its not just efficient, its over efficient. People paying prices for assets based on future proformas now. It used to be based on T12s, now anyone that wants to really win a deal has to do so on projections. Its literally like the stock market at this point.
Agreed.... especially in larger markets where thinks are widely marketed. I'd consider starting a biz servicing the CRE industry today, rather than looking for CRE investments and be invested myself.
People think this is more sophisticated, but really this is people thinking they are too smart for their own good and that they can predict the future, paying some insane price and defaulting so someone gets a deal later on. You can say whatever you want on a proforma to get to a price and sell it so it somehow makes sense to investors. It's funny hearing not to use 2-3% for expense/income growth like using 0% or 10% in years xyz is some insane change, or there's a way to calculate it v2. In reality there's not much that can happen, they go up or down and at a certain rate. This isn't rocket science and at the end of the day a deal should make sense on a napkin, no reason to complicate it.
Acting like T12 is in the past and a less sophisticated way of thinking is ridiculous. It's what has actually happened in the past and previous performance. It's the only real data you have unlike projections and cost estimates for your new business plan. Just like the stock market you can't predict anything and there are tons of groups who get crushed and never perform anywhere near the S&P using the most technical analysis with very intelligent employees from the best schools in the world. It's all bs.
Good perspective, thanks - any groups you particularly respect?
I'm in the same boat, looking for sponsors with a true understanding of their craft, whether equity or lender. My advice, stay away from the promoters/advertisers and if a group advertises only strong returns. Unfortunately, the market is saturated with funds, debt funds, and deal sponsors that have no real experience.
Ask hard questions, ask for investment reports for existing projects, what's the state of current investments, ask for references. It's better to no invest than to invest in a bad group and lose money. Recent article in Wall Street Journal about a fund claiming to be an insured bank offering 15% returns, journalist asked them questions and uncovered its complete BS. That's how easy its been for fools to get in on fundraising with no experience. Another group raised money with a "preferred return" of around 10%. How can you pay a 10% return? You can't. This group apparently was making equity investments in small companies. Sponsor went dark on the investors. It's crazy. Anticipate a lot of fallout and restructuring of who gets to raise money via SEC regs.
Hahahahahahahhaha.
Yeah, no. Big shops can't hit "high" returns because they're so constrained in where they can invest (because they can't invest in small deals) that they all compete for the same things. Smaller shops find a ton of market inefficiencies, it's just that you don't really understand what a value add investor does, because so many crappy firms claim they're "value add" when they mean they do the same thing as everyone else and hope cap rapes compress.
Small firms that get bigger and stay that way can be assumed to be driving superior returns. It's hard to judge this on a day to day basis because real estate is highly illiquid and doesn't mark to market. But if you take a snapshot of the landscape every 5 years or whatever you can get a good feeling for who is "driving superior returns"
Agree with the statement. The place to achieve outsized returns in real estate is allocating to investments in the $2M-$7M space. Too big for HNW and too small for larger shops and most syndicators. So this is where you will find mispricing. The hard part about growing a business in this space is you don’t generate a ton of fee income to live off of, promotes are smaller, yet you actually need more staff because you need to do more investments.
Can you elaborate more on the syndication part?
There's a long list of syndicators that were charging very high acquisition fees upfront combined with equity splits where they were only contributing a very small piece of equity. The result was they convinced dumb money to buy these deals with them at terrible prices + they're operated poorly. The syndicators made so much money up front on their fees that if these deals go belly up they're still ok but the dumb money is crushed.
How would you define smaller? Not an institution?
Find any multi investor that has been actively buying since the 90s - early 2000s and has only borrowed fixed rate. They have probably averaged 20% + annual returns over a 20 - 30 year period.
Fair point. Generally I’d say less than 1B AUM
Yea…but much of this is driven by macro - cap rate compression and falling interest expense. Plus - more fund flows driving increased valuations.
Croatan Investments out of Virginia Beach has a great track record. Multifamily only investor that has an open ended fund. I believe they are over 30% IRR net to investors over the past 15 years.
They only do 1-2 deals a year, usually off market, that are total home runs. They will underwrite 1000+ deals a year at a basic level to get the pulse of the market. Very smart people, especially the founder. Great place to learn but not a great place to stay…founder keeps vast majority of the promote for himself and pays low salaries.
Thank you, this is all I was looking for.
When I left my old shop in 2021 I think investor return was low 20% IRRs strictly doing multifamily and industrial; given they've been growing a lot + markets have stalled it may have changed.
Care to share firm or market?
Crow Holdings
How much work do you want to put in to it? Look at new construction filings and cross reference against what's being paid for land. See who is trending to have more work or less. See who is raising bigger funds and who isn't.
I understand what you're asking is for people who work at those firms to open up the books and tell you how they're doing, but in the absence of finding that one insane person chiming in, you probably have to do the legwork yourself, and this is as good a methodology as any
yeah would fully say I’m at one of these firms, would not give the name or sauce out.
Vero numquam delectus quidem accusantium. Ut rerum et qui. Perspiciatis voluptatem et omnis dolore. Dolores magnam repudiandae quod magnam. Voluptatem ex accusamus magni sequi laboriosam consequuntur voluptatem. Unde est fugit est dolores error.
Fuga autem non odit sint cumque labore. Ad eligendi occaecati impedit consequatur voluptatem ut aut. Ratione quaerat tenetur vel reprehenderit et.
Accusamus consectetur ut sunt molestiae. Ea a pariatur autem alias cupiditate earum quasi. Dolorem nam at dolor. Exercitationem earum nisi quibusdam veritatis ut quidem repellendus voluptatem. Repudiandae nihil temporibus iste earum aperiam laboriosam ducimus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Repellendus optio ducimus totam debitis. Tempora perferendis et enim quisquam quia atque.