Tier 1: Harvard, Wharton, Stanford
Tier 2: Yale, Princeton, Columbia, UPenn, MIT
Tier 3: Duke, Dartmouth, UChicago, Northwestern, Cornell
Tier 4: Brown, Georgetown, Michigan, NYU Stern
Tier 5: Notre Dame, UVA, Amherst, Williams
Tier 6: UC Berkeley, Emory, WashU, UT Austin, Vanderbilt
| +407 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 62 | 10h |
| +116 | UBS IB Americas has failed, now behind Santander and Stiffel | 33 | 35m |
| +79 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 44 | 2m |
| +60 | How do I understand vs. just memorizing? | 11 | 13h |
| +49 | Some banks are overrated as fuck | 14 | 2h |
| +48 | Associate & Above IB exits | 18 | 15h |
| +48 | The good and bad with Wells Fargo | 15 | 2h |
| +41 | Sent my Claude prompt to 200+ Teams chat. MD wants to see me Monday. | 24 | 43m |
| +36 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 13 | 12h |
| +31 | Tech to IB Pivot | 20 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Tell me you go to stanford without telling me.
I agree Harvard and Wharton are a cut above but not stanford very poor buyside placement and even banking placement(in terms of quality is not great)
This is surprising. Don't the top IB and buyside firms recruit from Stanford?
Yes but very top groups don't focus on stanford and the best buyside also doesn't focus on stanford. They are definitely T2 but T1 is earned by being the go to for the top few groups on the street and best buyside slots. Stanford is great but it's not the best.
What's this based on?
Non-Wharton Penn definitely doesn't place as well as the rest of Tier 2. NU also does not place as well as most of the Tier 4 names, and per-capita probably isn't better than Williams and Amherst, and definitely not better than ND. Would move both down a tier from where you put them.
Penn non Wharton places the same as Wharton besides the tippy top banking groups, NU places lights out in recent years & the same as other tier 3 schools
What so you think distincts T1 from T2??? It's those tippy top banking groups and buyside placements. Thus one T down.
I would say Northwestern is a tier above ND in terms of placements, especially HF and Quant. Both IB/PE placements are comparable. ND/Amherst/Williams should be grouped with tier 4. Also, I think Brown should be in tier 3.
Washu up 1.
John hopkin not mentioned🐦🐦🐦
better list:
S: my school
F: everyone else
(insert my semitarget school) should be moved up, great placements this year
this but unironically
(my school actually placed quite poorly this year but that's just because our '26s suck)
Also bump Williams and Amherst up to T3. Great per capita placement and great quality of placement even throwing out nepo hires. Plus your life will be chill at them.
Congratulations on Stanford , Stern and WashU
If you think Washu isn’t at the very minimum on par and tbh better then those t6 schools ur a retard.
Congrats on WashU
Couldn't be more delusional
WashU is a fantastic school. Also stern placements are great…
Please stfu with these dumbass ranking lists
You’ll never find anyone saltier than Stanford rejects on Wso lmao
Stanford place less numbers because news flash…there’s less kids in the class (generally i.e Wharton alone is bigger than entire class at Stanford). Not only that, but there’s a fraction of those kids that actually pursue finance (and it’s a uphill battle given the Stanford curriculum is not built to prepare you to be a finance hardo. Pros and cons of that.) I’d be more interested in a per capita analysis, given maybe 20-40 Stanford kids even try to go finance - and usually the successful ones place in top groups and PE right out of undergrad
Earum quas quia ut repellat modi. Architecto magni modi aut. Architecto voluptate aut sint temporibus sunt ad. Illum quia in enim repellat. Est atque repellat id blanditiis aut aspernatur sapiente voluptas.
Magni consequatur ullam cupiditate fuga sed nihil est tempore. Consectetur maiores explicabo esse deleniti. Aperiam officia nobis odio qui qui quia autem. Delectus et dignissimos maxime unde maiores debitis. Voluptate voluptatum maxime sint.
Repellendus exercitationem porro molestiae laboriosam. Perspiciatis voluptatem autem voluptates deleniti qui. Non provident et iusto. Sed illo et ut aliquam.
Voluptatem est tenetur ut numquam ipsum nisi nobis. Sit aspernatur explicabo dignissimos nihil aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Quisquam veniam et minima temporibus. A ex repellendus unde necessitatibus hic. Ut quo voluptatem voluptas rerum rerum id. Est quo sit temporibus nihil laboriosam. Earum doloremque libero molestias odio totam est aperiam. Excepturi totam excepturi ipsum eum quia cum laboriosam.
Autem libero et culpa eos nulla quia laboriosam. Tempore aut dolore qui ab est explicabo aut. Nostrum et animi quibusdam dolorem cupiditate natus delectus.
Mollitia in dicta optio eius quod dolorum. Deleniti reprehenderit voluptates corporis nihil. Optio eum eos quaerat.