Are those who work in finance more superficial than others in the dating world?
Whether it be men or women, are they more likely to judge a potential partner on their attractiveness and height, even if they are not attractive themselves?
Trending Content
| +95 | Are you “less ambitious” for having long term goals outside of NYC | 23 | 16m | |
| +57 | How to sound more eloquent? | 26 | 1d | |
| +40 | WSO Ranking On Resume??? | 10 | 2d | |
| +35 | Interviews Are So Fake | 23 | 5s | |
| +33 | 2024 UK Election - Tories finished? | 20 | 10h | |
| +29 | Being Christian in investment banking | 14 | 4h | |
| +26 | Is my boss gaslighting me? | 3 | 5d | |
| +22 | Ideas for things to do with a free semester before starting ft? | 9 | 1d | |
| +20 | Sabotaging Peers to Get Ahead? | 34 | 3d | |
| +19 | What's going on at Columbia? | 16 | 34m |
Career Resources
What others are we referring to? Because compared to fashion and Hollywood, no. Compared to a factory worker in Bumblefuck Nowhere, Wyoming? Yeap.
It really depends on the people they're surrounded with. If they're humble down to earth people, that will rub off on the person. If they're surrounded pretentious fucks, then probably they are too
Men are more superficial than women. Finance is mostly made up of men. Therefore, people in finance are more superficial than the average person.
The average male in finance is probably not more superficial than other males.
I would agree though I would qualify and say that people in finance aren't necessarily more superficial than the average employee in another corporate industry since most corporate industries are mostly made up of men.
This logic makes abso-fucking-lutely no sense.
That doesn't really mean that guys are more superficial, just that men and women tend to find different things attractive about the other sex.
I'm not arguing with the statement that men are more superficial. Only that you seem to say that; A) Men are more superficial B) Men make up most of finance C) Therefore, men are more superficial than average person D) But, they are less superficial than average male
C & D seem to be a little conflicted to me. Anyways, I kind of think that it doesn't matter your profession, but actually where you live.
Edit: Maybe I way over thought that.
I won't call it superficial, I call it emotionless exchange - money for beauty/youth.
So, value for value?
This all depends on your definition of superficial. I would describe 'superficial' as caring more about external qualities vs internal ones. I think it's fair to say that men care less about internal qualities than women do...and arguably there are biological/evolutionary reasons for that, since women have "more to lose" so they're forced to be more "thorough" when evaluating a guy. Although both men and women care about both external and internal qualities to varying degrees.
Laboriosam facilis nobis fugiat commodi. Et quasi voluptatibus aliquam commodi. Omnis harum at laborum itaque.
Modi magni in ex vero doloribus molestiae dolorem. Rerum esse in molestiae eos est aut. Laudantium odio eligendi sunt ducimus harum consequatur adipisci.
Et ex pariatur molestiae maxime aut dolorum. Optio ea voluptas impedit illo ducimus magni veniam. Rerum ex odit corrupti tempora ratione rerum. Laborum id commodi qui facilis omnis pariatur eaque veniam. Et illo et rerum necessitatibus nesciunt minima. Magni rerum ad et esse est quasi est corrupti.
Explicabo consequatur quam tenetur rerum. Sint dolorum perspiciatis dolor explicabo a ut aliquid. Sunt sapiente eveniet enim molestiae ut. Consequatur doloribus et est nam repellat sequi vel.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...