Philosophy
Is Philosphy look highly upon by recruiters in equity research and hedge funds?
Philosophy is no doubt the quintessential humanities major and it can really train one to think extremely critically. Thus it seems like an easily transferable skill to ER or HF. However what may seems to be true may not be.(IB not really doing investment)
Thanks!
Also, if i do a double major in economics, would it put me in a better position?
I don't think Economics would give you much of a boost. A math or finance degree would highlight the quant skills being sought. More important will be your extra-curriculars (clubs, internships). And please don't put the word "quintessential" on your resume ;)
Yes but isnt it also true that quant skills can be acquired(e.g. cfa, msf), but that isnt totally case for critical thinking. Granted yes, critical thinking is a skill that can be acquired over time, but the key word is over time. Logic doesnt seems to be the norm these day in investing, but rather algorithms, That doesnt make sense.
MSF takes awhile to get and I don't think CFA will really compel you to learn much in the way of real quant analytics. I am a finance major and let me say that the best course you can take in my opinion would be financial/industrial engineering (IE is usually 5 yr program) or pure mathematics. I am taking calc II next semester and wish I had time to take more because looking at half of the hedgefund jobs on boards require a lot of programming and stuff that I don't have.
With regards to economics it depends on the school. If the OP goes to a lib arts school, then they probably don't offer finance, but the econ is probably heavily quantitative. I know my econ degree had more intensive math than most finance degrees. It was basically an applied math degree.
OP; I'm just saying this out of my own observations, but the classics such as philosophy, etc. seem to be more acceptable in places such as the UK and Europe. Not sure how they fair here, but I worked with a kid over the summer from Edinburgh U and he said most kids in finance industry started in classics (not sure how true that actually is)
A thorough study in classics gives one a solid foundation in both analytical and verbal skills. In particular, a course in Latin language is a very rigorous process, the study of which resembles more math and physics than modern languages. I remember when I took Latin in my freshman year of college (wish I studied it sooner!) the students pursuing in STEM on average performed better than the humanities students. A friend of mine who excelled in Latin was a physics student who went on to get his PhD in Astrophysics from Princeton. (He then switched course and joined a seminary to become Jesuit priest, odd change of course but maybe he found God while looking through telescopes?)
Re OP's point, it depends which courses in philosophy. I doubt recruiters would be impressed by courses in Derrida or Foucault but if you took the more rigorous courses like analytical philosophy (Frege, Russel, Wittgenstein)formal logic, metalogic, set theory etc. then you can make a case that you have enough mental power to handle quantitative works in finance.
The most rigorous, proof theoretic course I took back in college was actually a philosophy course. The proofs we were asked to do for that course were much longer than the ones I did in my math classes like real and complex analysis.
Ah that make sense! Thanks! So what you are basically say is that take up courses that will better bolster my the thinking function and use that as a case in point. Right?
Also, would recruiters even call me up for an interview when it is seen that I am a philosophy major?
Wait, actually? That's rather interesting/something I wouldn't expect someone to hear. Well, complex is kinda pretty so maybe there, but real is just a gross mess...
I work in the UK; I did Philosophy & Economics. There's a course at Oxford called PPE which is basically the undergrad UK equivalent of MBA@HBS. It's how you spin the philosophy that does it.
In my BB, I know of not one person in my class that did Classics, so really not sure that's true at all.
Yea. The UK education system is much much more intensive than the US system. Compare the A levels with the AP exams. So UK UG = US MBA isnt really that much of a surprise.
Also! I am considering taking PPE! But however, I dont really have that much of an interest in politics..
Higher level math courses (especially anything pure) foster more critical thinking than what you'd consider "quant" skills. Additionally, why doesn't investment based on algorithms make sense? It's a way of implementing pattern recognition in a rather "nice" fashion. (For the sake of noting bias, I am a pure math + economics major).
canas15 i love you for asking the same questions I wanted to ask...
Yea same..wow that is quite sick..always knew philosophy requires a ton of writing, but didnt realized THAT much
I think you should double up with economics. I'm doubling in Econ and psych and have so far received positive reviews of my choice. You want to make sure you show you have both sides. Quantitative skills can be taught but hopefully Econ will help you understand the economy as a whole and give you a good base of knowledge to operate from. Besides, double majoring is easy so you should be able to maintain a high gpa. If you feel you can do both, why not?
To be fair.. PPE isnt really Oxford exclusive, its more the case of Oxford and Said being quite intense.
Did you go there, and if so, was it recently? Is the Bridge still in? I have a reunion comming up so Im curious.
Don't know who you are referring to but I am a prospective student for oxford. Don't think I will get in though. Probably Exeter
Man, college in the UK and Europe sounds so cool...
I met a kid in a logic class who was double majoring in Math and Philosophy..while he didn't seem to have any interest in finance (perhaps he wasn't aware of the paychecks) I'm sure he would have dominated any quantitative problem. I think that skill is much harder to acquire than "Can you even Cash Flow, bro?"
This thread is honestly beating a dead horse. As long as you go to a target, major doesn't matter. At a BB, I have seen art history majors and math majors both in FO roles. The real question is work experience and a high GPA. Good luck.
I have seen an art his major in one of those college-grad programmes in State Street (I have never worked there). And one of the Fidelity families is an art history grad, (though with a MBA from a target). But they are the anomalies. How do you get an internship in the first place if you major in art history? Many econ major from targets struggle to answer the question why the IB, why this role. Just saying.
Someone get Illiniprogrammer here because he's gonna love my answer. How do art history undergrads get FO BB positions? Because they go to the most competitive schools. Anyone with a good high school education can learn how to balance an income statement, cash flow, and balance sheet. Once you get good at those three, you can arguably build your own (very simple) model. Kids at HYP are hard working, and they're seen as "less risky" to hire than someone from podunk college. I can provide you a third-party, real life example.
One of my friends goes to Rutgers. He's a finance and economics honors major with loads of community service and he has a 3.5 GPA. For sophomore internships he cold emailed like 500+ firms in the northeast and got only a couple of interviews and no offers. Another one of my friends goes to an ivy and he made a couple of calls to alumni for his junior summer internship.Within the hour he texted me that he got an interview. The next month he got the summer internship and he eventually got the offer in a FO position in a selective group at a BB. Guess what his major was? Music and philosophy lol It's not an anomoly, major really doesn't matter as long as you go to a top school. (Ivy, Stanford, MIT, etc.) It has always been that way and it always will. Now how do you break in as a non target? I went to a target so I have no clue lol Although the kids I have met at my BB from non targets are still very smart and everyone gets along with them equally. Once you get the job, no one really cares.
Temporibus quia odio numquam sequi eius. Et id et quaerat et et ut libero. Sed ea qui atque qui molestiae et. Ipsa veritatis ab asperiores dolor sunt voluptate recusandae.
Quis libero tenetur aut nam tenetur amet. Reprehenderit commodi repudiandae vel qui maxime. Animi est corporis error eaque ut et. Ut nostrum ullam incidunt enim velit. Temporibus ex maiores distinctio ratione animi fuga. Reprehenderit consequuntur minima qui non amet dolores incidunt. Laborum itaque inventore occaecati optio et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et est magni nisi neque sint placeat. Labore hic consequatur ut eius optio fugit. Aut cum consequatur officiis voluptatem saepe possimus dignissimos rem. Non voluptates amet officiis molestiae. Optio non quisquam quis possimus impedit.
Quibusdam voluptatibus possimus rem. Quod optio dolores quaerat sit placeat ut. Qui dolores et voluptatibus id impedit in optio. Quibusdam corrupti non laborum rerum eveniet facilis.
Sit consequatur quidem optio voluptas sed. Ea ea laudantium atque eius. Labore dolores fugiat dicta saepe ducimus. Odio suscipit eveniet ut cumque culpa illo officiis.