Stocks that always trade above their intrinsic value

Thinking of a lot of defense stocks here. It feels like these things always trade above their DCF value. In practice, do you just accept the way the market values these things (on next year earnings or EBITDA) and disregard the DCF?

 

If you rely on DCFs to do anything other than lie to clients with numbers pulled out of your ass, I have a bridge to sell you

 
Funniest

"Unjustified" is a funny way to say "My model is entirely inaccurate at predicting public market prices that depend on far more factors than what you can find on accounting statements". Lots of ex-PE and ex-IB folks entering public markets think that the voodoo they and every other glorified accountant calls a "rigorous model" is enough to compete against hundreds of people with STEM PhDs and/or decades of experience trading that sector.

 
Most Helpful

Newbie here. I get that DCF is kinda not that useful, but then how do you value a stock in the first place? What are all the STEM PhD's actually doing?

When I was first learning about finance, I was really confused at how the markets assign a seemingly arbitrary value to a stock. Why are stocks trading at their current level, and not twice as expensive / half as expensive?

Then I learned about DCF, and it seemed like a convincing answer. Stocks couldn't be twice as expensive, because if they were, you could sell your stocks and buy an equally risky portfolio of bonds to get a greater return on investment. Time value of money, arbitrage, MPT, CAPM, etc etc etc.

After a while I realized that you can make a DCF say whatever you want it to, and you will generally end up making a model that confirms your existing subconscious beliefs. Not only that, but it seems that the markets don't really trade on DCFs anyway. So all in all, I'm kind of back to where I started. I mean, clearly there's no single correct answer to this question, but I'm curious ... what do you even do, if not DCF? How do you begin to approach the question of valuation?

 

Doesn't that just mean that the market's "DCF value" is higher than what your assumptions show it to be?

 

Well, if we take exactly the consensus numbers for the initial years and calc the DCF, for a lot of stocks we still end up with a substantially higher DCF value than what it's trading at. That means the bulk of the value is in the terminal value, which you can then use to back into the implied growth rate. Often times, even in a 10 year DCF, that implied g is more than 3% when we have been taught that no company can outgrow GDP forever. 

 

Gold mining companies - Newmont, Barrick, and so forth. Terrible historical returns on capital, doubt future returns on capital will be much better, they are valued the way they are due to the scarcity of large cap gold-related stocks. Fine to trade but buy & hold will leave you with an inadequate return. 

Longer term likely to be superseded by copper mining companies as the high value pure play mining companies (and the gold mining mgmt teams know it too!).

 

Why do you think copper miners will replace gold and not another metal miner?

 

Minus accusamus qui cumque minus. Repudiandae sunt autem incidunt sint. Beatae unde aspernatur nulla natus. Placeat ea ea quis minima ipsum dignissimos.

Est voluptates ut alias fugit nemo. Non repellat eaque dolores et omnis ratione. Eligendi sunt sit ipsam sit pariatur ducimus. Deserunt et quia eum aut odio ut numquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.9%
  • Magnetar Capital 96.8%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • AQR Capital Management 94.7%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 98.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.8%
  • Blackstone Group 96.8%
  • Two Sigma Investments 95.7%
  • Citadel Investment Group 94.6%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 97.9%
  • D.E. Shaw 96.9%
  • Citadel Investment Group 95.8%
  • Magnetar Capital 94.8%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (23) $474
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (6) $322
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (24) $287
  • Manager (4) $282
  • Engineer/Quant (71) $274
  • 2nd Year Associate (30) $251
  • 1st Year Associate (73) $190
  • Analysts (225) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (22) $131
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (249) $85
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”