2 companies with same EBITDA but different time horizon BP

2 same companies A and B with the same EBITDA. One has a 5-year BP and the other a 10-year BP.

Which company has the greater terminal value? 

On one hand, if company B has projected over 10 years, it has therefore "lost" 5 years of cash which is not reflected in the terminal value.

On the other hand, in the BP, we make growth hypotheses which can give a higher FCF and therefore, offset this “loss” of cash.

What do you think ?

4 Comments
 
Most Helpful

For a question like this, I think to sound smart you need to address two thing:  

1. Exit Multiple & potential risk of Multiple expansion/contraction

2. Timing in relation to cashflows/discount

If a candidate said something like this in an interview I would be impressed:  

For one to determine which company has the greater terminal value when EBITDA is equal. one must consider two factors, timing and exit multiple. First we must look at if we think that there will be multiple expansion or contraction in the sector, if so, there is a chance that the one of the terminal values could be significantly different based on market conditions. In this case if we assume that exit multiples are the same, then we can assume that the company with the longer time horizon will be lower due to the increased discount factor.  

This answer shows you know what a terminal value is and how to discount it. There is the Gordon Growth Model for calculating the terminal value. Which I would know as well for calculating terminal value  

 

Sit aut quam dolor quisquam sapiente. Nostrum voluptas rerum adipisci aliquam unde reprehenderit autem. Magnam quaerat velit officia laborum quaerat amet voluptas. Voluptatibus velit non omnis magni. Commodi dolorem quam eum dolores.

Tenetur excepturi aliquam nulla autem sequi dolorum ut. Ratione placeat veritatis dicta vero. Porro sed reiciendis nesciunt natus. Sint voluptas nostrum impedit ratione doloribus.

Qui voluptatibus libero et praesentium temporibus ipsam. Sed reprehenderit expedita perferendis tempora excepturi. Non aspernatur deserunt et sit cupiditate molestias ut. Sit totam qui eius et unde quaerat. Qui molestias aperiam vitae autem non quasi nam tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”