155 Comments
 

I’ve heard from directors I’m close to, but we have gotten zero positive indication from our group head that it’ll be a good year. Our group head loves to tell us good news, so him being radio silent tells me it’s going to be bad. 

 
Most Helpful

Hear you

I get that it’s a volatile business. 2022 was a bad year, fee pool cut in half, etc

But as market recovered they never readjusted bonuses

2025 was 2nd largest fee pool ever behind 2021. If they don’t pay again this year it’s clear they never will and it’s the new norm.

Would be fair if we were some bucket shop, but the firm actually performs, which is really disheartening

 

I know an EE ASO3 last year that got $125 or so, but we only had one EE. I think the EE and EM buckets there's some flex depending on how many they give that rating to or how much group head likes you. ME and below is standardized from my understanding. 

 

would highly recommend that everyone recruit out of bofa sooner than later if you plan to work in ib through your VP years. How many years of this low pay does it take for people to understand it is just the bofa way and will not change? It is not like the bank has anything else going for it. God awful leadership, loss of its best MDs, bloated rosters, terrible M&A deal flow relative to its platform.

 

BofA is poorly managed and the leadership team will always pay less than other firms. Get out as you will rarely if ever be surprised to the upside

 

Look at their Q4 release - IB fees were roughly flat YoY. Assuming a slightly smaller headcount from the RIFs… expect maybe a 5% increase from levels last year. 

Agree with the guy above - if you want to stay in IB during your VP/D years… get the hell out of bofa. You miss out on hundreds of thousands of dollars, and WLB isn’t even that good in strong groups.

 

What’s the move? If you’re ASO3 this year with easy track to VP promote, do you stay for the promotion and then jump ship to a good paying bank as a VP lateral? Do you leave now? Do you stay and become a pass through VP to tolerate it / milk the base comp? Comp delta at associate level has been a tough pill to swallow but the WLB helped. But the VP delta seems unpalatable

 

Think answer depends on your deal experience. Would be shit to lateral as As3 and not get the promo because you're the new guy + no deals under your belt. Also, the better banks may ask you to take a year back as an associate, but don't think I've heard of any VP asked to take an extra year in a lateral situation. 

 

A recruiter from MS reached out last week with the opening line "Given where BofA bonuses stand...", so wouldn't get my hopes up. 

From several people in group, I have heard that EE and EM may get up to 10% bump from last year (so bonuses will still suck). MM groups are going to get close to $0. 

I was lucky enough to have a few M&A deals closed this year, so will be using that to lateral. 1 public and 2 sellsides, which I think is enough for at least a Citi / Wells. 

 

You could be right in that there will be variance in the MM bucket, but afraid it’s going to be like $25 vs $45 here. All indications I’ve heard point to MM buckets being really fucking bad. 

 

With significant frustration last year some high performers were topped up with equity post initial bonus (very unusual) + the fact that quite a few, including strong performers, left last year, does make me think BofA must have gotten the message. I’m going a bit contrarian and assume for top couple buckets it won’t be top of street but at least more in line with market / where it should be.

 

koder has been talking a big game about trying to displace jp/ms/gs for top 2/3 - plus fees have been healthy and pipeline strong 

would imagine/hope comp matches up...otherwise what r we doing

good luck all, may odds be in your favour

 

increasingly easier to tell that leadership is clueless on how to grow ib. i am convinced that an undergraduate business student would be able to make more sensible moves than bofa leadership. lose rainmakers by paying them low? continue to retain low performers? keep an armada of bottom bucket bankers to build a middle market practice?  watch your top performers move to your direct competitors? swap ib leadership almost every year because everyone is clueless? ALL CHECKMARKS AT BANK OF AMERICA

 

Every year same post from BOA folks. If bonuses have sucked for four years and people are still hanging around, either the complaints are exaggerated, work-life balance is extremely good for the money, or BOA bankers just can’t lateral to other banks. Which is it?

 

people are leaving for sure with the top performers noticeably gone in all groups across the bank. the senior levels look rough. i think for juniors and midlevels it is a more rolling process where those who have been screwed for a few years finally learned their lesson and the newer bankers are hoping it is an aberration before they come to the same realization.

 

May be ancedotal but it seems like most public banks have been underpaying bonuses and then a mass exodus of top performers leave.

I’m at a MM Balance sheet bank, literally 50% of analysts have left within the last 6 months due to the summer bonus. Remaining ones are bottom/mid performers that are having to do AN3/AN4 stints since they aren’t being promoted.

 

Yes, think it's time to leave if numbers tomorrow suck. The hours last year were terrible post RIFs and people leaving. I stayed for the better hours but at this point, it makes sense to lateral to another bank.

 

Here are rough numbers I've gathered for mid bucket (ME). Lot of folks not in office today due to weather. Let me know if I'm off anywhere, would appreciate any corrections. If you're in the upper buckets, add $30-$50 to your bonus, maybe an additional $70-100 at VP levels.

Have edited below based on additional data points, but please continue to correct me if wrong

As1: $70

As2: $80

As3: $90

VP1: Heard both $135 and $170, maybe triangulate to $150?

VP2: [removed until more data]

VP3: [removed]

 

Not a data point but are bad bonuses at BofA the case across capital markets?

Anyone know if S&T / CB / ER are street level in terms of comp?

 

Anonymous Monkey:

$525 all-in as VP1. Around 35% of bonus stock. Not top bucket but good performer. Ok with it but you guys think I should be mad? 


$250k is street for middle bucket VP1

 

ASO 1 EM

100k 70/30

Guys wtf am I gonna do with 30% stock - how is this good / street? It’s a 4 yr vest it may as well be 0. 

I busted my absolute ass for only 70k cash? Is this delusional - I’m completely unsure what other ASO 1s are getting at top bucket 

And any idea what ASO2 base goes to?

 
Funniest

After that whole email chain fiasco I am disgusted I share my fate with these Charlotte nc imbeciles 

 

Can make a good guess based on the 79hrs I log every week into banker diary 

 

Analyst 1 in IB-M&A

ASO 1 EM

100k 70/30

Guys wtf am I gonna do with 30% stock - how is this good / street? It’s a 4 yr vest it may as well be 0. 

I busted my absolute ass for only 70k cash? Is this delusional - I’m completely unsure what other ASO 1s are getting at top bucket 

And any idea what ASO2 base goes to?

isn't $70k cash basically $40k after taxes? 

 

Analyst 1 in IB-M&A

Operations associate from Charlotte NC

investment banking actually, but have fun earning 30k bonuses a year for the next 2 years buddy! make sure to tell koder that you'd happily suck his nuts in the neutral gender washroom while he sips a red bull and takes a shit next time you see him at town hall :)

 

Hey guys, on the bright side, we're getting some RSUs from Moynihan! 

 

Serious question - and I don’t mean this to be rude - but why are there so many associates, VPs, and Ds staying at BofA when you can almost certainly double your bonus at other shops? 2025 was a great year for IB, a great year for M&A, and a great year for BofA IB, so this is clearly the new normal for compensation there.

Also curious why this bank pays so poorly. They’re either still extremely bloated or koder is a cheapskate. Honestly, I’m kind of impressed they can pay people this badly and still finish #3 in total fees every year… 

 

As a former BofA (or actually BAML) employee, will add

  • As associate it’s frustrating, but only 1 or 2 per class in a group is worth something and worthy of a high end pay. That’s why you see EE loaded. In general, not many make MDs and definitely not great MDs so why pay them
  • Very few seniors bring true deals. Lot can be done just w brand name around Lev Fin and ECM - so again why pay. I would argue Lolly Wu is worth it. Ron Eliasek - don’t think so?
  • For those w RSUs - mine barely changed in value over the years. It’s actually as useful as putting money in BofA savings account
  • You can always consider jumping, but I’ve seen people just flake out at boutiques very quickly except some exceptions. Same with going to other banks. Not worth getting mad over $30K but also if you aren’t top, likely won’t have a long term career in banking anyway. It is easier to get a head of whatever title in BofA / Citi / Barclays than Goldman or Centerview / Evercore 
 

If goal is to maximize near term pay - just go to an Evercore / Moelis

CIBC, Mizuho type corp banking places are just that - corp banking. They’ll never be an investment bank - I’ve not seen it happen in over a decade. 

Cantor / RayJ - they really deal with some scrappy questionable small deal mandates and anytime I’ve seen those deal teams - the mid / junior level are just bad. Seniors are questionable. To give you some relative terms - do you really want to mess around w $1mm sell side M&A fee w 20% success rate when a follow on w 2 day of internal work gets a bank $4mm?

I personally wouldn’t want to thug it out there if I am top 1/3 at BofA and feel pretty good about making director / not rockstar MD (otherwise try a legit boutique route). If you’ll get fired this summer - sure. As an associate / junior VP - just too early to do that. 

 

There are a couple problems with this statement:

  • You can get away with paying “replacement level” seniors a bit below market but if you take it too far, they lateral and you have vacancies in key coverage areas. It’s a balancing act, and every bank does this (not just BofA) but BofA chooses to absolutely ream middle performers more than other banks.  There are plenty of people in the top 10%-50% percentile who are additive and worth paying. 
  • At the ASO and VP level, you can’t always tell who the top performing future MDs will be. Some of the most mediocre VPs turned into the best MDs. Paying 99% of people at this level peanuts has a significant adverse effect and you could lose a good future contributor.

    BofA’s strategy is basically to pay the top 5% EE people something that resembles street, and screw everyone else. Just overhire juniors, underpay them and hope a few are stupid enough to stay and keep the machine running. I suppose it’s a strategy, but their stagnant/slightly falling market share suggests it’s not a good one. Where this strategy really hurts is in M&A where you need individual talent to win - sure you have a handful of top people who bring in M&A deals and get paid, but banks like GS and JP have much deeper rosters of M&A contributors because they have a smarter talent management framework. That’s also ignoring the fact that many top bankers at BofA don’t get paid what they perceive they are worth in the first place  (ie Kevin Brunner)

 

Brunner example is a classic example of the current BoA strategy. Top banker capable of turning around the god awful tech group and then they screw him and now he is at a direct competitor taking all that knowledge and experience with him. And who did they replace him with? 3-4 journeyman bankers splitting the triple co-head title. 

 

Don’t disagree w above at MD level - but not sure if it applies to associate / VP level. It does create a very narrow set of winners, but the ones who were outside looking in didn’t do much better elsewhere without some exceptions. At MD level - yes they basically lost most good people and just don’t have a great bench (although arguably is it any different than Barclays, Citi, CS, etc, who were their recruiting peers 10-20 years back, not GS, MS, JPM). 

 

I had heard Brunner left because he was passed over for the co-head of IB role? They promoted Joo and Faiz in June last year and Brunner left in October or so. It wasn't due to underpayment from this bonus cycle, unless he was unhappy with last year's bonus, which is highly likely too. 

 

BofA leadership is in trouble with investors over low returns and profitability. Moynihan's time is nearing its end at the bank. I literally hate all these boomers who cashed in millions of dollars at the heyday of I-banking pre-2008 but now pretending to be financially conservative. If you had paid such ludicrous figures in 1990s you'd get to find only homeless junkies willing to work for you.

 

Ppl shouldn’t be filling out applications online if they actually want to make a move. They should be leveraging the vast network of ex-BofA bankers that are now at other banks. A lot of MDs and VCs have switched to other banks and can push your resume if you are actually a decent performer. 
Or they should be leveraging their co-advisor m&a deal teams to switch to their bank instead or whatever team was on the buyside when they were on the sell side vice versa. Again, assuming you are a decent performer and took ownership of your deal workstreams and weren’t a  “camera off” / “always on mute” type of person. 

 

This thread seems overwhelmingly focused on the IB side which obviously has its issues as plenty have noted. What about other parts of the firm? From what I've gathered from people in parts of Markets pay was fine if not above street for certain groups/people. Did everyone get crushed firmwide or do they just not care about IB?

 

Anyone willing to share what MMs got? Curious if there was a range or just set number for each level.

 

I cannot stress this enough - if you’re an ASO, VP, or D at BofA, not EE rated (95% of you), and have the chance to lateral to another IB… take it 100% of the time. I’m writing this as a cautionary tale. Do NOT believe them when they tell you they pay market, that is undisputably not true and you’ll see that quickly if you look hard enough.

At BofA you literally miss out on hundreds of thousands of dollars relative to street if you stay… and I’m not just comparing to EBs. That could be your kid’s college fund, a big chunk of a home down payment, etc. Not chump change. They started screwing people with 2023 bonuses and haven’t stopped as the market has picked up. It’s been 3 years in a row of below market bonuses, how much more does it take. Yeah BofA has a good brand and decent deal flow relative to a lot of platforms, but at a certain point you need to start harvesting some actual money if you’re working these hours and giving your life to this profession.

Leadership is probably laughing at the fact they can screw people this badly and continue business as usual.

 

How bad were the MM bonuses? All this talk about EE when that's 1 person per class? Need to know what the 50% got. Also heard they lumped the associate classes together, so a first year is ranked against third. 

I heard MM bonuses for VP were like 65 in C&R.

 

VP MMs got like 50-75k in the group I’m familiar with. So 50% of the VP class gets under 75k bonus.

MEs and EMs didn’t fare much better - most of them were in the mid to upper 400s (even senior VPs). And they’re in the top half of the class (just not the top 5%). IMO they’re the people who really need to leave - they get worked hard and are generally good performers getting the shaft 

 

It’s really a shame that a bank with this strong of a  brand and deal flow pays this badly. It’s puzzling how they are choosing to run their investment bank. 

They made the right moves going from number 10 or whatever in 2017 to number 3 in 2021… but at that point they got a bit ahead of their skis growth wise and got high off their own hubris (over hiring, funneling their bums into EGRC and expecting to win), and it ended up hurting them a bit. 

Citi and Wells are replicating the same playbook now, hopefully they learned something.

 

Et architecto dolorem id. Nesciunt qui eaque optio odit a aliquam. Est velit aliquid quo cum recusandae. Sit harum non porro est rerum et distinctio. Asperiores aliquam suscipit eum qui illo.

Laudantium aut quo molestiae ea quo. Maiores et quis dolorem est enim. Explicabo vitae sapiente in sit modi. Sed ut in hic excepturi quo. Veniam at at aut.

Nesciunt accusamus voluptas sequi quod. Culpa ipsam tempore ad tempore et eos nesciunt asperiores. Autem ab consectetur mollitia et deleniti ut eos. Et aut sunt perferendis consequuntur. Illo est sapiente architecto dolorem vel praesentium nisi.

Ipsam ut sunt quaerat. Suscipit cum velit qui dicta. Saepe soluta sint quisquam et dolores. Nam corporis delectus aut ut aut enim sapiente. A illo est nemo rem. Ea et modi fuga qui.

 

Tenetur eligendi aut inventore. Dolor quo earum facilis magnam ratione dolor quia. Est qui fugit voluptatibus quae qui.

Magni labore dolores impedit quae. Optio sit et quibusdam. Laboriosam quidem ad eligendi reiciendis iure nesciunt vel facilis. Commodi officia rerum et qui placeat. Porro reprehenderit in ut vel. Qui cupiditate dicta repellendus voluptas consequuntur. Officia animi rerum expedita ab alias sint.

Aperiam qui molestias rerum ut et. Doloribus tenetur dolore quas. Aspernatur omnis nihil accusamus excepturi autem debitis praesentium libero.

 

Laudantium voluptatibus occaecati sed et dolores accusamus. Esse eveniet dolore sit occaecati placeat dolor natus nihil. Aut repellendus mollitia voluptatem error vero quis aut.

Enim sint ullam fuga at. Porro accusantium perferendis porro veritatis ipsa occaecati. Dolor veniam eveniet velit veniam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”