Mods changed the title
OG: MD told me I had "Hot Tits" when I asked him how to calculate EBITDA for software cos.
Okay so two ways of calculating EBITDA:
(1) EBIT + D&A from Cash Flow Statement
(2) E + Interest + Tax + D&A
When you look at software companies' income statements, you'll notice the amortization of cap. software costs/acquisition-related stuff built into the OpEx line items (R&D, S&M, G&A). Hence the following reconciliation:
GAAP G&A Expense
(-) Amortization of Capitalized Internal Use Software Costs
(-) SBC
= Non-GAAP G&A Expense
So how do you calculate EBITDA for companies that exhibit "Amortization for [insert cause]" in their OpEx Line Items?
.
bump
Similar experience. Accidentally ran into my VP in gray sweats and she said I was packing.
Anyways you just add it back no? Where it appears shouldnt matter
I thought since it's already embedded in the OpEx line items, the amortization of that item would be counted twice when you add it back.
How would you be double counting it?
It’s lowering operating income so you would add it back to EBITDA. Potential common error of your signs are flipped (expenses are (negative)) and you + Amortization you’d be double penalizing
Chenz
.
Lol I got happy for a sec
But D&A aren’t broken into two pieces typically
Add the amortizations back.
Just to be clear, two types of amortization there, one is amortization of capex representing internal developed software/patents etc. Second is the amortization of Goodwill which was generated from acquisitions. Both to be added back.
I personally won’t add back SBC because if those are not opex I don’t know what they are.
Goodwill isn't amortized. It's tested for impairment with a triggering event.
My homie in Christ…in certain sponsor backed deals the company can elect to amortize goodwill.
To this posts broader point you add back capitalized software to EBITDA unless you are a rating agency which would discount the capitalized software as an actual expense flowing through the p&l resulting in lower EBITDA.
software EBITDA will always add-back SBC. in the grand scheme of EBITDA add-backs it's one of the less egregious ones
Depends. I think it’s 100% legit for lenders to add back sbc to ebitda.
It’s pretty dumb to do so in a valuation though.
Look at what is added back as non-cash in CF statement
Still not getting the concept, if by add-back would you do:
GAAP EBIT
+ D&A from CFS
- Amortization that is already built into the line items (since both G&A expense and D&A on CFS include the same Amortization amounts)
= EBITDA
why is g&a on the cash flow statement?
D&A can be baked into several income statement line items. but 100% of it will always be on the cash flow statement. Why can't you simply take EBIT from the income statement and add D&A from the cash flow statement?
You don’t amortize tits, you have to depreciate them, those assets have a limited life and only get worse without significant maintenance capex
straight line depreciation or double declining?
Depends on the size of the assets, typically larger assets will see accelerated depreciation
Their salvage value is the divorce money you get when your husband opts for a split-out to do an M&A with a more modern pair of tits (read: younger).
The goodwill on the husband's balance sheet is the sugar daddy money he reimburses her every month, over the EV of those assets
How could you possibly downvote this with such a prestigious title
When you're such a hardo that your nipples go hard when calculating EBITDA
Perferendis vitae quia eos iure. Commodi officia dolor incidunt nihil. Soluta dolore delectus dolor et unde labore reprehenderit. Expedita ut ut eum numquam sapiente velit. Non laboriosam odit tenetur quos nam distinctio ut. Magni earum quas sed asperiores.
Est eos qui quia eligendi excepturi rerum iste. Laboriosam autem eum maxime id consequatur repudiandae ut. Reiciendis natus consequuntur veniam quaerat consectetur.
Aut libero est explicabo minus quasi. Dignissimos sapiente dicta dolorem voluptatem est vel. Ut recusandae blanditiis non voluptatem voluptas et necessitatibus.
Ullam enim dignissimos et ratione. Dolorem beatae id enim non dignissimos velit. Nostrum in nostrum odit sequi quasi veritatis ex. Omnis beatae fuga doloremque itaque. Debitis eos sapiente aut et quis. Earum facere quia ea laborum qui dignissimos sed. Aut dignissimos modi fugit corrupti assumenda sed ut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Placeat est harum neque et nostrum. Vitae omnis omnis aspernatur cumque. Facere consequatur laboriosam excepturi iusto quidem quas ut. Quia et odio ratione perferendis. Aut voluptas rem tenetur fuga aut nihil. Est animi adipisci eaque rem dolores natus eum.
Dolorem cupiditate hic nostrum rerum eum nulla. Doloribus nobis ut minus quo sint. Vero quae aut temporibus qui pariatur.
A nisi officiis et nostrum rerum fuga. Voluptatem ut est placeat soluta. Sit est et dicta asperiores praesentium rerum. Repellendus eveniet doloribus aut. Ipsam quo aspernatur ut error non ex laborum. Dolores omnis qui molestias necessitatibus. Qui ut quia et hic.