Is accretion/dilution the most profoundly stupid “idea” in the history of mankind? (Yes)

I’m obviously exaggerating (slightly) but I’m astonished that anyone takes this analysis seriously. The stock market certainly doesn’t give a shit that your heavily waterboarded numbers say that your deal is a good idea - most buyer share prices tank following deal announcements.

Basically every deal paid for with cash will be accretive (it’s basically impossible to have incremental net interest expense > the boost in pf pretax income) even if you’re overpaying by like 500x and destroying massive amounts of shareholder value.

Once upon a time we amortized the gigantic new goodwill from mergers such that overpaying in cash deals had real consequences for pf earnings. but now we don’t.

we should probably look at economic value added (ie returns from the acquisition minus buyer WACC times purchase price) instead of accretion/dilution.

please tell me why i’m wrong though

8 Comments
 
Best Response

You're not wrong

All of these metrics are analyzed when a buyer is deciding to do a deal or not

Also, not all deals are paid for using 100% cash so then the metric does matter...

I agree acc/dil never matters more than incremental FCF per share

But shareholders want to only do deals that will be accretive because that is the "headline" number

 

Acc / dil concept is closely connected to the idea that if faced with a choice buying a share of a company A that generates $1 per share or company B that generates $0.5 per share, we are better off choosing company A, all else equal

If I remember correctly, Joel Greenblatt uses this example to explain fundamentals of stock market investing

Don’t see why it’s stupid to be honest.. what you may be referring to as stupid is the continuous quantitative easing, which makes interest rates so low that ultimately in most cases using cash results in accretive acquisition - that is a different story though

 

I laid it out fairly clearly I think. The analysis fails to consider whether the buyer is overpaying for the target. 

Also the sensitivity of accretion/dilution to the form of consideration almost renders it worthless. Even a fantastic business you buy at a great price could be dilutive if paid for with stock. By contrast, you could use all cash or low interest debt to overpay for an awful business and have a model tell you its accretive

The fact that you no longer amortize goodwill exacerbates the issue. 

 

I think most people would agree with you, nobody actually makes m&a decisions based on acc/dil but because it's an important signal to shareholders/investors it is almost always presented alongside a projected npv-positive acquisition. 

To live is to suffer, to survive is to find some meaning in the suffering.
 

Dolorem corporis suscipit ut minima. Sint est quam aliquam non unde totam. Reiciendis quasi a eum quam. Deleniti at iure consequuntur animi qui necessitatibus laborum. Velit tempora corporis quisquam officia esse. Accusantium voluptatem optio sit.

Nemo corporis modi labore repudiandae accusamus tenetur placeat. In occaecati possimus qui rem facere facilis quia excepturi. Est incidunt soluta vel est et dolores facere ratione. Dolorem nemo aliquid nihil atque. Et aspernatur magni ea molestiae.

Repellendus harum facere enim. Vitae vel mollitia deserunt necessitatibus. Asperiores placeat eos repellendus autem odit consequatur explicabo consequuntur.

Soluta repellat nemo consectetur aperiam. Tempore dolores dolorem aut minima. Suscipit animi voluptatum vel ut libero non. Nisi sunt velit animi quis. Aut dolores nihil aut vitae a. Id aliquam exercitationem optio voluptas.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”