LBO Question
Would appreciate anyone's help in answering this question.
Why does using cash flow to repay debt increase returns more than keeping the cash flows in an LBO?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
Career Resources
bump
I'd guess it has something to do with reducing interest expense in addition to reducing debt.
Increases enterprise value by reducing net debt, hence higher return as there will be a higher EV exit multiple (thus higher ROI and IRR) at exit date. Sponsor can also use FCF to organically grow business to increase EV.
The decision to either accumulate cash or pay down debt over the hold period using said cash does not increase your exit multiple.
If interest expense was zero, your IRR would be indifferent between sweeping cash to pay down debt or accumulating cash.
The higher IRR you receive by paying down debt over the hold period is purely a function of reducing interest expense which, given its circular nature, generates more cash to pay down debt and hence you have a slightly lower net debt position at exit (increasing equity value and returns).
I think you missed the point of OP's question. More excess cash (hoarding cash) also decreases net debt. From the way the original question was worded, I think it's already understood that paying down debt is one way to increase the value to equity.
My stab at answering the question is that I don't think paying down debt increases value to equity more than hoarding cash does (besides the interest expense point, mentioned by a poster above). My understanding is that you pay down debt so you can stay within financial covenants, pay mandatory payments (If I understand correctly, sometimes cash sweeps are written into the docs as well, so you may be on the hook for more than just "mandatory" payments), stay on lenders' good side, avoid downgrades that make refi / reprice more difficult down the line, etc.
If you keep the cash on your BS, you earn little to no interest (say, 0.5%). But you still pay interest on your debt (in an LBO, think 4–8% depending on leverage).
If you pay down the debt, you earn less interest on available cash (missing out on a small cash-in) but you pay less interest on outstanding debt (avoiding a proportionately larger cash-out). Hope this clears it.
Tempore dolorum ducimus impedit aut similique quis. Voluptate quasi mollitia illum delectus. Voluptatem voluptatum recusandae quibusdam doloremque dolore voluptas. Est impedit dignissimos et accusamus est laboriosam distinctio nam. Odio quibusdam atque soluta magnam aperiam est dicta voluptas. Nostrum aliquid sunt odit in.
Est vero qui fuga dolores incidunt. Et dicta et quibusdam aut odio nostrum est. Beatae sunt fugit repellat in cumque in.
Quia quasi voluptatem ad omnis qui hic quam. Nulla quos aperiam culpa vitae asperiores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...