Lehman IBD or Goldman Financing?
Which one and why?
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +433 | Is UBS really that bad? | 77 | 9h |
| +265 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 2d |
| +219 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 46 | 16h |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 2d |
| +75 | Useless associates | 15 | 28m |
| +73 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 19 | 2m |
| +61 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 10 | 3h |
| +52 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 24 | 12h |
| +44 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 15 | 1h |
| +41 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 2d |
Career Resources
what subgroup at GS?
Financing sucks. dont let the GS name fool you man. Lehman IBD all the way. solid shop, great exit opps.
It's apples and oranges. Go with IBD.
.
On a related note, how does GS FIG compare to GS IBD in terms of comp and lifestyle?
I should say the other departments within IBD that is.
Assuming that your full-time goal is IBD I would say take the Lehman offer.
GS Finance does have an interesting group, which I believe is called the Bank Debt Portfolio Group. They basically work with the GS IBD LevFin group as an execution team for every live leveraged finance deal that goes through. This is good in that you only work on live deals, however I don't know how much of the analytical work they actually do. Overall, if you are interested in PE this may be an interesting group (BDPG, spefically the Execution team) to look into, but if banking is where you want to be full-time go Lehman IBD. I don't think that being in this particular GS group would necessarily be better for your chances at GS IBD full-time, although you would be dealing with GS levfin bankers a lot and could possibly make good contacts, if that's what you're concerned about. As far as elsewhere, I would say Lehman IBD looks better by far.
.
jj80, can you elaborate more on that? as far as i understand it, as an analyst in the financing group, you work in one of the following subgroups: ecm/dcm/lev.fin/muni.fin, which are not very modeling-intensive (with perhaps the exception of lev.fin) compared to the industry groups. that said, exit opps may be limited for an analyst who spent two years in ecm at GS, although it's technically under the 'investment banking division'. any insights will be appreciated.
If you actually have offers from both, the right choice is pretty self-evident
.
i actually know someone who turned down ms ibd to go to GS financing (for the summer). he also got an offer from gs ibd (i.e. industry groups. and yes, gs gave him two offers b/c the decision making processes were separate at the two groups) but turned that down as well b/c it was with a regional office that he didn't want to work at. any thoughts on that?
fyi, all of the above offers are for asia pacific positions.
how hard would it be to switch to industry teams (or m&a) at GS or other bb's after spending a summer at gs financing? thanks for the insights!
lets all hope you didnt pick Lehman big guy
LOL look at u digging up old posts
Iste veritatis eveniet perferendis nihil nihil tempora nisi. Tenetur quos voluptatum quas quis voluptatem.
Pariatur saepe ad repudiandae. Ipsa in in quam sit cum qui enim. Ullam consequatur accusantium et ut iure.
Ut officia nulla commodi deserunt aut. Voluptas itaque eum sit quia consequatur mollitia possimus ut. Sapiente nisi corporis quam voluptatem nisi minima velit. Veritatis ipsum dignissimos et voluptatem laborum. Aut quam ipsum officia explicabo est quibusdam voluptatibus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...