LFCF formula????

"Walk me through the Free Cash Flow calculation in an LBO model. How is it different from EBITDA, and why do we need both?" 

"In an LBO, Free Cash Flow = Net Income + D&A +/- Change in Working CapitalCapEx."

From BIWS 400 Guide


Bruh. Is LFCF not NI +D&A - capex - change nwc + net change in debt (new debt - mandatory debt repayments)?????

Why is it excluding the change in debt? thought the whole point was to see the cf available to cse holders? 
 

4 Comments
 

Levered Free Cash Flow is cash flow after debt-associated costs. It is the cash flow that is left over available to equityholders. 

Unlevered Free Cash Flow is the same figure but before the effects of debt (interest expense/tax shield, amortization of debt principal). 

We need EBITDA because it is a standardized measure/proxy for cash flow that we can apply to most companies for easy and quick comparability. We need Free Cash Flow when we want to understand the "true" cash flow that a business generates. Free Cash Flow provides more depth by accounting for things like Change in NWC and Capex. 

 
Most Helpful

This is kind of just semantics on a metric that really does not have any strict definition. 

Remember that in a traditional LBO you’re not using the cash flows to derive a value directly like you are in a DCF. You’re using cash flows to model how much debt you can sweep, and you’re calculating an IRR on a cash outflow at entry and inflow at exit (let’s just keep it simple for the sake of example). 

Mechanically, the way this usually looks in an actual model is you would have a line for Levered FCF, then a line for mandatory debt repayments, then cash flow available for (optional) debt service which would flow through the debt schedule to sweep debt. That line is essentially what you are used to thinking of as LFCF in a DCF context.

It’s sorta just presented differently in different contexts. But in an LBO it’s more about mechanics of the model and clarity/convention whereas in a DCF that stream of cash is directly driving a value and must account for those debt payments to be correct.

 

Qui sed sequi odit. Voluptas sed quia distinctio voluptatibus est. Eius in maxime quidem.

Est ut fuga eos velit eaque natus error. Quis possimus et ut.

Aut animi corrupti necessitatibus molestias itaque. Debitis sit ut laboriosam deserunt porro quisquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”