Question Regarding Levered/Unlevered Beta

I came across some content on Levered/Unlevered Beta on Investopedia and they had this to say:

"Determining a stock’s levered beta helps the investor to decide and determine the correct course of action to be taken in order to improve profitability. **When the security’s performance is in line with the market, the investor should invest when the market is performing well. When the security’s performance is against the market, it is better for the investor to invest when the market performance is poor."**

Shouldn't this be the opposite? Why would I invest in a market-correlated asset when the market is at its high? Wouldn't I want to invest in a beta=0 security instead to hedge against the impending downturn?

In the very same article we see these two contradicting statements:

1)  "**Unlevered beta calculation** removes the debt factor when arriving at the beta figure. As the effect of leverage is removed from the calculation beta figure derived **is said to be more accurate.**

2) "Of the two, **levered beta is said to be more accurate** and realistic as company debt is taken into consideration."

Please let me know if I have this all wrong. Thanks

2 Comments
 

It's not making a statement on peak vs. trough, more simply good times v. bad times. During good times you would want to purchase a security that is correlated to the market (it will go up with everything). When times are bad, a low beta or even negative beta would be best (if market down, it will be down less or appreciate in value). If you could time the peak or bottom of a market, you are absolutely correct. You would purchase a low beta asset at the top or a high beta asset at the bottom.

The contradictory statements are odd. I suppose the unlevered beta would be the most "accurate" representation of the riskiness of the underlying business. However, levered beta gives the fullest picture of the riskiness of the asset because (in public markets) I'm not aware of a way to isolate the business risk from any of the financial risk it has taken on to finance the business.

 

Cumque fuga et quis velit voluptatem quia. Adipisci minus qui culpa debitis doloremque facilis sunt.

Velit enim ipsa et labore accusantium velit qui. Perferendis sunt nemo sunt architecto quis. Adipisci sint magnam rerum dolore amet.

Voluptatem incidunt sit aperiam porro dignissimos. Sunt nisi qui quo eligendi et sequi provident dolor.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”