Question Regarding Levered/Unlevered Beta

I came across some content on Levered/Unlevered Beta on Investopedia and they had this to say:

"Determining a stock’s levered beta helps the investor to decide and determine the correct course of action to be taken in order to improve profitability. **When the security’s performance is in line with the market, the investor should invest when the market is performing well. When the security’s performance is against the market, it is better for the investor to invest when the market performance is poor."**

Shouldn't this be the opposite? Why would I invest in a market-correlated asset when the market is at its high? Wouldn't I want to invest in a beta=0 security instead to hedge against the impending downturn?

In the very same article we see these two contradicting statements:

1)  "**Unlevered beta calculation** removes the debt factor when arriving at the beta figure. As the effect of leverage is removed from the calculation beta figure derived **is said to be more accurate.**

2) "Of the two, **levered beta is said to be more accurate** and realistic as company debt is taken into consideration."

Please let me know if I have this all wrong. Thanks

2 Comments
 

It's not making a statement on peak vs. trough, more simply good times v. bad times. During good times you would want to purchase a security that is correlated to the market (it will go up with everything). When times are bad, a low beta or even negative beta would be best (if market down, it will be down less or appreciate in value). If you could time the peak or bottom of a market, you are absolutely correct. You would purchase a low beta asset at the top or a high beta asset at the bottom.

The contradictory statements are odd. I suppose the unlevered beta would be the most "accurate" representation of the riskiness of the underlying business. However, levered beta gives the fullest picture of the riskiness of the asset because (in public markets) I'm not aware of a way to isolate the business risk from any of the financial risk it has taken on to finance the business.

 

Rerum distinctio voluptatibus aut nam quia voluptas. Voluptatibus dolorem et inventore sunt. Soluta illum harum totam. Aut accusamus ut ratione voluptas facilis possimus facilis.

Harum aspernatur pariatur quia quos eum doloribus. Rerum nisi quo qui aut quia at ab. Harum cum ipsam expedita et dignissimos debitis. Eius autem sed quia. Ea alias dolorum in magnam minus quas ut.

Et velit enim nostrum beatae sequi. Delectus odit quae voluptates a.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”