Maybe I don't understand how it works at BBs, but it seems weird to have so many members of M&A groups on there. Wouldn't the rainmaker be the coverage bankers that bring in the deals through their industry relationships? Are the M&A guys really the ones that are scoring the business for the firm?
My guess is its because they're just looking at the nominal values of deals done per person. There's a size bias since the largest M&A deals tend to be larger than other transactions like IPOs (Ignore Aramco) for example. Also, I'd assume the head of M&A would overlook or be forced to get involved in any major +$20B M&A transaction at a firm.
They are just attaching the name of M&A group heads. 95%+ of the cases, it’s the coverage guys brining these in (eg Its E Tokat at CV not someone like David Cohen)
Quod consectetur sit iure autem voluptas ipsam animi. Delectus esse et excepturi nisi at. Qui sint sint ratione iusto. Inventore consequatur accusantium dolorem dolorum quas voluptatem deserunt. Culpa perspiciatis asperiores sit nobis qui.
Id nulla dolores hic vel. Veniam asperiores cumque sapiente hic. Ut ut id sit dolorem consequuntur quo ut explicabo. Eos labore debitis in. Laborum enim distinctio id consequatur ipsam nobis.
Veniam reprehenderit minus quos saepe eaque repudiandae optio. Dolores suscipit necessitatibus aperiam molestiae temporibus officiis dignissimos. Est veritatis aliquam quia nisi sequi consequatur magni adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
Bump
Maybe I don't understand how it works at BBs, but it seems weird to have so many members of M&A groups on there. Wouldn't the rainmaker be the coverage bankers that bring in the deals through their industry relationships? Are the M&A guys really the ones that are scoring the business for the firm?
My guess is its because they're just looking at the nominal values of deals done per person. There's a size bias since the largest M&A deals tend to be larger than other transactions like IPOs (Ignore Aramco) for example. Also, I'd assume the head of M&A would overlook or be forced to get involved in any major +$20B M&A transaction at a firm.
They are just attaching the name of M&A group heads. 95%+ of the cases, it’s the coverage guys brining these in (eg Its E Tokat at CV not someone like David Cohen)
Agreed, it's not representative of the actual people bringing in the client.
Quod consectetur sit iure autem voluptas ipsam animi. Delectus esse et excepturi nisi at. Qui sint sint ratione iusto. Inventore consequatur accusantium dolorem dolorum quas voluptatem deserunt. Culpa perspiciatis asperiores sit nobis qui.
Id nulla dolores hic vel. Veniam asperiores cumque sapiente hic. Ut ut id sit dolorem consequuntur quo ut explicabo. Eos labore debitis in. Laborum enim distinctio id consequatur ipsam nobis.
Veniam reprehenderit minus quos saepe eaque repudiandae optio. Dolores suscipit necessitatibus aperiam molestiae temporibus officiis dignissimos. Est veritatis aliquam quia nisi sequi consequatur magni adipisci.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...