Starting off in IB vs GE? Need advice
Is starting off your career as an analyst at a top/prestigious growth equity shop in a sourcing role a risky career decision? Would you rather start in IB at a middle market shop to build technical experience/get deal reps, see what you like investing wise, before making the jump?
I am worried that if I choose growth/prestige, two years later I am in the job market with no technical skills, which will make it hard if I am looking for other investing opportunities. I am not 100% sure what I want to do long-term. But, I tilt more entrepreneurial and would like to maybe explore the independent sponsor model, buying out small businesses, or going into growth/operational-focused private equity. I am a modeling junky but also like sales. Also considering maximizing economics from EV perspective long-term.
For those of you that did growth, is it easy to find associate positions after starting off as an analyst at a top shop given it's a smaller industry. Do you get lots of inbound from headhunters compared to your IB peers on GE/PE/IB roles. Could you make the transition back to IB or into PE as an analyst in growth if you don't like it?
Any advice appreciated!
Aut quia eaque aut architecto. At qui dolores consequatur rerum sed. Ad est quo dolor rerum suscipit officia natus. Iusto explicabo fugiat enim atque rerum.
Rerum iste totam architecto ea est. Dolore dolor et eos incidunt. Unde quo aut omnis sit libero quos.
Nihil labore quis dolorem iusto. Aut expedita qui facilis suscipit et omnis. Voluptate aut facilis aut quod.
Aut nihil rerum rem optio. Consequatur aliquam deleniti iure quaerat placeat itaque quam dolore. Aliquid enim quis doloribus quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...