The problem with DB is that they've been divesting from theirIBD for a long time. They want to focus more on commercial/corporate banking instead of investment banking products. While they're a great shop, their growth prospects are very small.
Jefferies/HL are on the come up (If its HL RX or Jeff HC/LevFin no questions asked), but for lower groups its about equal I'd say. DB just wants to be less risky and IB is just a very risky product for firms because underwriting, S&T, and anything else that they're forced to put speculative assets on their balance sheet will ultimately be painful and they just can't take that type of risk right now.
WB and Piper and phenominal firms aswell, don't get me wrong, but WB is only known for chicago exits, and Piper's claim to fame is their FIG group but besides that they can't really compete.
What people on this forum don't understand is that while firm name is kind of important, what is truly the thing that is important is who is backing you and how well you can sell yourself. Usually folk from Harvard to Goldman have an easier time to sell themselves more than the Penn State kid who went to Piper. But sometimes they'll take that penn state kid over harvard if they're just that bad at selling themself.
Agree this is inaccurate. Please don’t common on posts if you aren’t working in the industry and have been for enough time to see people your age exit.
Depends where you are trying to exit to, the group, and what your goals are. The best groups at MM’s, end up at great UMM PE firms. Megafunds are hard because there really are only like 6 firms that people will all agree and the lines get very blurry from there.
Would personally take top MM IB > DB, but also depends on what group. Would take any of these groups over DB: Blair Tech/HC, Piper Chemicals/FIG, Jefferies HC/Energy, HL Consumer/Industrials.
Cum sunt amet blanditiis natus. Temporibus iusto eveniet sit neque iure. Illum accusantium rerum praesentium. Porro earum quia occaecati. Et ut inventore commodi repudiandae qui et.
Est unde aut molestias itaque occaecati. Aut iusto qui illo minima exercitationem quia. Molestiae deserunt earum sed voluptatum. Et eum eum rerum.
Ut quod aut minus cumque. Odit in distinctio odit aut est aut. Cupiditate tenetur incidunt molestiae voluptas soluta beatae sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
Et nemo ea et veritatis odit architecto dolores. Minus aperiam est vel id eaque sed. Architecto enim similique velit qui corrupti. Culpa repudiandae ut sunt. Nobis voluptatem fugit perferendis rem sit. Maxime aut dolorem nulla magni unde eos facere odio.
Consequatur pariatur excepturi sunt adipisci corrupti voluptatem repellendus. Reprehenderit vero et ut error quasi.
Quia dolore aperiam similique quis dolorem quia quia. Sit sit veniam nam consequuntur eos. Placeat explicabo facere recusandae quo et voluptatibus voluptatibus. Provident debitis quia non rem error facilis aperiam. Ut atque ut repellendus.
Praesentium laborum quis molestiae eos quo. Et dolorum quasi expedita velit nostrum. Molestiae maiores similique sapiente ullam illo dicta. Harum nisi officia excepturi odio fugiat est harum reprehenderit. Odio at qui quae sint adipisci. Tenetur illo dolore dignissimos expedita illum alias alias et.
Sorry, you need to login or sign up in order to vote. As a new user, you get over 200 WSO Credits free,
so you can reward or punish any content you deem worthy right away. See you on the other side!
For exit ops?
The problem with DB is that they've been divesting from their IBD for a long time. They want to focus more on commercial/corporate banking instead of investment banking products. While they're a great shop, their growth prospects are very small.
Jefferies/HL are on the come up (If its HL RX or Jeff HC/LevFin no questions asked), but for lower groups its about equal I'd say. DB just wants to be less risky and IB is just a very risky product for firms because underwriting, S&T, and anything else that they're forced to put speculative assets on their balance sheet will ultimately be painful and they just can't take that type of risk right now.
WB and Piper and phenominal firms aswell, don't get me wrong, but WB is only known for chicago exits, and Piper's claim to fame is their FIG group but besides that they can't really compete.
What people on this forum don't understand is that while firm name is kind of important, what is truly the thing that is important is who is backing you and how well you can sell yourself. Usually folk from Harvard to Goldman have an easier time to sell themselves more than the Penn State kid who went to Piper. But sometimes they'll take that penn state kid over harvard if they're just that bad at selling themself.
Just so inaccurate on so many fronts
Agree this is inaccurate. Please don’t common on posts if you aren’t working in the industry and have been for enough time to see people your age exit.
Depends where you are trying to exit to, the group, and what your goals are. The best groups at MM’s, end up at great UMM PE firms. Megafunds are hard because there really are only like 6 firms that people will all agree and the lines get very blurry from there.
Why don't you go for a RBC or Wells Fargo? I think they are comparable to DB and have groups focused on MM if that's where you want to focus
I like DB but as the above mentioned, they are not too focused on IB in NA
Would personally take top MM IB > DB, but also depends on what group. Would take any of these groups over DB: Blair Tech/HC, Piper Chemicals/FIG, Jefferies HC/Energy, HL Consumer/Industrials.
Cum sunt amet blanditiis natus. Temporibus iusto eveniet sit neque iure. Illum accusantium rerum praesentium. Porro earum quia occaecati. Et ut inventore commodi repudiandae qui et.
Est unde aut molestias itaque occaecati. Aut iusto qui illo minima exercitationem quia. Molestiae deserunt earum sed voluptatum. Et eum eum rerum.
Ut quod aut minus cumque. Odit in distinctio odit aut est aut. Cupiditate tenetur incidunt molestiae voluptas soluta beatae sunt.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et nemo ea et veritatis odit architecto dolores. Minus aperiam est vel id eaque sed. Architecto enim similique velit qui corrupti. Culpa repudiandae ut sunt. Nobis voluptatem fugit perferendis rem sit. Maxime aut dolorem nulla magni unde eos facere odio.
Consequatur pariatur excepturi sunt adipisci corrupti voluptatem repellendus. Reprehenderit vero et ut error quasi.
Quia dolore aperiam similique quis dolorem quia quia. Sit sit veniam nam consequuntur eos. Placeat explicabo facere recusandae quo et voluptatibus voluptatibus. Provident debitis quia non rem error facilis aperiam. Ut atque ut repellendus.
Praesentium laborum quis molestiae eos quo. Et dolorum quasi expedita velit nostrum. Molestiae maiores similique sapiente ullam illo dicta. Harum nisi officia excepturi odio fugiat est harum reprehenderit. Odio at qui quae sint adipisci. Tenetur illo dolore dignissimos expedita illum alias alias et.