Racism on WSO

I log onto WSO every couple of days to read what people are talking about, and I always at least one if not more threads that are incredibly racist, with many comments supporting it. Whenever crime, Black Lives Matter,#stopasianhate, diversity, or systemic racism are mentioned, the post is swarmed by people repeating white supremacist talking points (most commonly the 13/50 stat, which has been labeled "racist propaganda by white supremacists" according to the ADL, when used to say Black ppl are "naturally violent"). Thankfully there are always a few users who are able to defend the common good, but it seems to be getting out of hand in recently. Now maybe I spend to much time on the Off-topic forum, but I have repeatedly seen them on IB as well, recently talking about the "very high" crime rates in NYC. I writing this mainly to say that WSO should focus more on stamping down on this hateful rhetoric and create a more welcoming environment

Edit: I got 2 MS within 3 min of posting this lmao.

Edit 2: I am specifically talking about incredibly racist comments, white supremacist, nazi level comments, not some random fox news watcher saying something politically incorrect.

143 Comments
 

Agreed. Black Lives Matter. Blue lives matter. Yellow lives matter. All lives matter

 
Most Helpful

I writing this mainly to say that WSO should focus more on stamping down on this hateful rhetoric and create a more welcoming environment

Bro shut the fuck up. WSO is one of the last places on the internet where one can speak openly and freely about our country. This--not career advice--is one of the biggest reasons I even stay on this forum. Don't you dare try to push censorship onto this site.

 

Do you think the "White Lives Matter" post should be deleted. Or is that fine?

I am not talking about full censorship of all ideas, I'm completely fine with conservative view points, but I think white supremacist ideas should be investigated by WSO.

 

"White Lives Matter" is a shitpost to trigger you, I don't care about politics and I'm not saying it seriously, I agree that there are too many political threads I've never made a political thread and the site would be better without them but if they are going to be here I'm going to shitpost in them just like I would shitpost in any other off topic thread

 

I am not talking about full censorship of all ideas

You claim to have good intentions. But in practice, this philosophy of "stamping down on hateful rhetoric" always leads to censorship of anything remotely politically-incorrect. You just advocated for calling the 13/50 stat (a proven fact) a "racist propaganda by white supremacists." So does every comment that mentions that blacks commit a disproportionately high amount of crime have to be deleted? We can't even state facts without being called racist at this point. No, I don't want any censorship of "hateful" content. If you have a problem with a viewpoint, debate it to show the other person (and the rest of the forum) why you are right.

 

wol21

Do you think the "White Lives Matter" post should be deleted. Or is that fine?

I am not talking about full censorship of all ideas, I'm completely fine with conservative view points, but I think white supremacist ideas should be investigated by WSO.

I think white lives matter just as much as black lives matter. What are you saying, that white lives don't matter? Almost twice as many unarmed white people are shot as black people, but black people commit almost 50% of all violent crime. That doesn't seem proportional or fair, does it? Do you have something against white people that supports your reasoning for their lives not mattering? That sounds pretty racist.

Also the 13/50 isn't just a "talking point." It's an FBI crime statistic, so all you've done here is show your own glaring ignorance. It's not racist to state a statistic, because facts cannot be racist as they lack intent. The ADL also labeled the OK hand sign as a symbol of white supremacy because of a meme that started on 4Chan. So if you believe everything the ADL spouts then you also think there's over 70mm white supremacists in this country, amongst which is the largest portion of minority voters to vote Republican since Regan.

Step outside your classroom, take the constant CNN chatter out of your ears, and grow up. Policing statistics are not indicative of racism, despite what the post-Floyd trial news coverage would have you believe.

 

I'm not saying it is, I'm saying racist rhetoric that is used to disagree with an opinion is rhetoric. I'm perfectly fine with having a discussion about current race relations in the US, but not if racist dog whistles or talking points are used.

 

lol you aren't actually perfectly fine if you need to throw the qualifier in there, 'racist dog whistle talking points' are only racist dog whistle talking points to certain people, they might feel like facts and not feel like racist dog whistle talking points from the perspective of the more 'racist' or actually racist person

 

What if something is racist/offensive to you but not to someone else? I kind of see where your coming from but I’m of the opinion that online discord should be as free as possible. I do think WSO does a decent job at doing that.

 

Im not talking for any sort of broad censorship. The "slippery slope" argument doesn't really pertain to this, however, I'm literally just talking about Nazi/White supremacist points, which are easily identifiable, open conversations about race I am completely fine with. 

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

wol21

Black Lives Matter,

The organization found by a self-proclaimed Marxist who wants to destroy family values?

I respect the movement but despise the organization.

#stopasianhate,

I'm Asian. DOJ reports that biggest perpetrators against Asians when it comes to violent crimes are Black and Hispanic people. But the media only reports it when a white guy killed/beat up some Asian person. 

"Stop Asian Hate" but we should be saying it to Black and Hispanic people too, not just white people. White libtards are so racist against themselves.

diversity,

People who want "diversity" the most forget why diversity is good in the first place. It's good because it brings different perspectives to the table. Unfortunately, the same people who want diversity want diversity without any of the benefits. They want us to be this giant homogenous monolithic culture that permits no different way of thinking. They're either idiots or fucking crooks. Either way, very dangerous.

or systemic racism

You mean Affirmative Action and all the nonsense about "Support black - owned businesses" only because they're black ? Look up on what "Racism" actually means.

 

The organization found by a self-proclaimed Marxist who wants to destroy family values?

I respect the movement but despise the organization.

Thats why no one listens to the organization, out of all of my friends (many of whom are socialists) who have been to protests, marched, spoken out for BLM, 0 of them follow the organization, there are definitely criticisms of it.

I'm Asian. DOJ reports that biggest perpetrators against Asians when it comes to violent crimes are Black and Hispanic people. But the media only reports it when a white guy killed/beat up some Asian person. 

"Stop Asian Hate" but we should be saying it to Black and Hispanic people, not just white people. White libtards are so racist against themselves.

StopAsianHate, nearly always stems from the labeling of COVID as the "chinese virus" a racist dog whistle, it should be prevented no matter what race is committing it, I agree.

People who want "diversity" the most forget why diversity is good in the first place. It's good because it brings different perspectives to the table. Unfortunately, the same people who want diversity want diversity without any of the benefits. They want us to be this giant homogenous monolithic culture that permits no different way of thinking. They're either idiots or fucking crooks. Either way, very dangerous.

I want diversity because of why you stated its good, different perspectives on the table are what make this nation the best there is.

You mean Affirmative Action and all the nonsense about "Support black - owned businesses" only because they're black ? Look up on what "Racism" actually means.

The goal of affirmative action is to equally represent each racial group in college (It should be based off class I will give you that) to promote diversity (see above), Black people have been oppresed in this nation for 400 years, which is why they benefit from it. BUT ALSO, white women benefit the most from affirmative action (https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women…), so do with that what you will.

 

out of all of my friends (many of whom are socialists) who have been to protests, marched, spoken out for BLM

If this statement doesn't feel right, then Idk WTF to say. All the "anti-capitalist Socialists" I've talked to have no idea their version of socialism is just nice capitalism. 

Couple of them were Software engineers making 6 figures going to nice restaurants. FUCKING IRONY.

The goal of affirmative action is to equally represent each racial group in college (It should be based off class I will give you that) to promote diversity (see above), Black people have been oppresed in this nation for 400 years, which is why they benefit from it.

And they achieve that by systemically discriminating against other races & letting in rich Black kids whose dads are lawyers and rich Hispanics kids with a mansion in Miami to fill the quotas. AA does not give a shit about actually underprivileged minorities. Otherwise, you'd see a lot more of them in colleges. 

BUT ALSO, white women benefit the most from affirmative action (https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women…), so do with that what you will.

VOX is like the liberal version of FOX. They're fucking wrong on so many things that it's fucking pointless to even bring up examples.

 

YuknoomCh'een

You do realize that conservatives can also be racists that pretend not to be racists, right? 

Sample size has not been statistically significant so WTF do I care. I see libtard racists everywhere I go in this Blue state of mine.

I spent a good amount of my life in a Red state and majority of the "racist" people are just ignorant of what other races are like because they haven't interacted with much. Once you talk to them and get to know them, they are generally good people. And they are usually pretty honest about, what they thought of you before they got to know me.

 

Pound sand, you whiny little snot.

Take our hateful rhetoric up your ass, you overly sensitive little twat.

Shut the fuck up, you ought.

A safe space, this place is not.

yoda falls

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

That 3rd line is a bit wonky on you too, but well played.

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

The comments on the post are what I'm referring to specifically. i.e. calling Black people the "13%ers" is racist

 

FactCheck: do black Americans commit more crime? – Channel 4 News

So 13/50 is not technically wrong - it's the conclusions that white supremacists draw from it that are wrong. Black Americans commit a disproportionate amount of murders. This is because black Americans are disproportionately poor (due to our country's history). Poor whites and poor blacks are equally likely to commit violent crimes like murder. But a larger % of blacks are poor compared to whites, so this skews the data. White supremacists say blacks are naturally more violent, but reality is that poor / uneducated people are more violent.

Anyways, I agree with other posters. You're annoying. There are generally good debates from both sides. WSO is not a meeting place for alt-right folks like certain subreddits. If it were to become a stomping ground for white supremacists like r/TheDonald, that would be different

 

FactCheck: do black Americans commit more crime? – Channel 4 News

So 13/50 is not technically wrong - it's the conclusions that white supremacists draw from it that are wrong. Black Americans commit a disproportionate amount of murders. This is because black Americans are disproportionately poor (due to our country's history). Poor whites and poor blacks are equally likely to commit violent crimes like murder. But a larger % of blacks are poor compared to whites, so this skews the data. White supremacists say blacks are naturally more violent, but reality is that poor / uneducated people are more violent.

I already stated basically exactly this in another comment, my point is that I have seen the "naturally violent" argument used. That is what I am talking about.

 

wol21

FactCheck: do black Americans commit more crime? – Channel 4 News

So 13/50 is not technically wrong - it's the conclusions that white supremacists draw from it that are wrong. Black Americans commit a disproportionate amount of murders. This is because black Americans are disproportionately poor (due to our country's history). Poor whites and poor blacks are equally likely to commit violent crimes like murder. But a larger % of blacks are poor compared to whites, so this skews the data. White supremacists say blacks are naturally more violent, but reality is that poor / uneducated people are more violent.

- expand -

I already stated basically exactly this in another comment, my point is that I have seen the "naturally violent" argument used. That is what I am talking about.

13/50 is an explanation for why of the 1,000 people killed by police each year a disproportionate number (relative to the population) are black (really, black men)--police have more violent interactions with violent criminals. If you could link to where someone asserted that black people are naturally violent I'd LOVE to see it. 

Ultimately, facts aren't racist. There are endless explanations for violence in the black community, but asserting facts isn't racist, despite what the ADL claims. 

Array
 

FactCheck: do black Americans commit more crime? – Channel 4 News

Poor whites and poor blacks are equally likely to commit violent crimes like murder. But a larger % of blacks are poor compared to whites, so this skews the data. 

Literally the exact link you posted disputed this.  Did you read it?  Or did you stop reading right before the part where YOUR OWN LINK said that many different studies say different things and the evidence is not clear?

 

I agree, you know you kinda sound familiar to someone you may not like.

"The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." - Marx

 

wol21

"The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." - Marx

How's that even close to what I wrote?

Truth being told, Marx made lots of good observations. Biggest issue is that his good observations were extraneous. His main points on how the history has worked and how economics works and should work (particularly on the state of capitalism) was all FLAT OUR WRONG.

 

thanks for being so fucking woke bro, your wokeness is rubbing off on myself and on all of the other posters, your wokeness is contagious and these posts of yours are so woke you are making OPs head explode

 

famejranc

thanks for being so fucking woke bro, your wokeness is rubbing off on myself and on all of the other posters, your wokeness is contagious and these posts of yours are so woke you are making OPs head explode

#STAY ACTUALLY WOKE

#REAL PROGRESSIVES HATE SJWS

Seriously, old school progressives like me (I'm in my 20s though) are fucking ashamed of dumbass SJW MaRxiSt PrOgGrEsSiVeS who wants to defund the police and fight racism with racism. I find them incredibly stupid and dangerous.

That's why I love Bill Maher nowadays. This pot-smoking super left-wing guy sees through the madness of wokeness and makes fun of it. Sooner or later, Twitter is going to label Bill Maher as a radical right-wing pundit and ban him.

 

Please shut the hell up, if you don't like the forum go join the pussies on reddit where all your libtard friends hang out

I've never once felt this site was racist (coming from a minority), reason I'm on the off topic forums here is reddit is a cesspool of white knight groupthink. Now here we have a dumb cu*nt trying to ruin the site for people who are moderate or even rationally conservative. Piss off

 

He was high out of his mind on fentanyl and meth. FACTS. Go look up a lethal dose of fentanyl and then look up St. Fentanyl Floyd’s blood concentration. More FACTS you won’t like.

But yea, since the insane amount of drugs in his system had nothing to do with his death, everyone should be okay taking the levels he did. You’d have no problem taking that amount, right? 

 

Fuck you dude. Leave WSO if you don't like it and spare us your all-too-obvious incompetence. Sincerely, a member of the so called diverse community

 

Amen and awomen brother. We need to be less white to fight against white supremacy. 

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

the banana to monkey shit ratio is indicative of WSOs collective view against the cultural marxism you are trying to foist upon us.

glad that the average IQ on WSO is higher than that of the instagram/social media echo chambers.

 

I hate to point this out, but the temples of wokedom are Ivy League unis. It's not the working class pushing for this nonsense, actually, they are the ones opposing it. It's the ''educated'' that are promoting this. I do recall reading a study showing that the higher the title, the more extreme the ideological position was. 

Never discuss with idiots, first they drag you at their level, then they beat you with experience.
 

Doloribus illo ea ad voluptas. Voluptatem qui corrupti doloribus sit deleniti cumque eveniet. In inventore voluptas consequatur id quis dolores vel. Natus blanditiis voluptate in qui quibusdam quam. Et et assumenda modi itaque hic magnam quo consectetur. Aut impedit numquam sint qui possimus.

Omnis quo libero quae et minus. Consequatur quaerat inventore a autem odio. Ab consectetur ipsum vel maiores aut eveniet. Sint asperiores non nobis ut enim. Cumque quos rerum et voluptatem rerum odio ut voluptatem.

 

Ut aut hic perferendis corporis et qui. Sint ab qui velit architecto sapiente dicta. Minima non natus quo sed. Voluptatibus sed dolor incidunt quibusdam vitae. Ut exercitationem consectetur laborum aut dicta similique.

Dolores ex harum iure vero ratione atque unde et. Itaque dolor sit dolores. Maxime possimus aliquid qui sunt quas. Totam totam ab maiores qui eaque officia voluptatem minus. Natus similique modi et fugit dolor. A perspiciatis repudiandae aut. Unde qui sequi quia.

Molestiae alias quisquam libero. Error et velit ullam tempore occaecati ab voluptatem. In eaque possimus aut laboriosam. Odit sunt eos sequi sed rerum. Et ut aperiam quia et earum quisquam voluptas eveniet. Quia maiores autem vel vel et voluptas aut aut. Ut placeat eum ex.

Fugiat eos amet corrupti eum soluta dolores. Quo temporibus nam porro hic ducimus. Aspernatur rerum eos aut amet eum omnis. Molestiae voluptas doloribus earum voluptatem.

 

Soluta libero dicta odio facere. Adipisci doloremque et ut exercitationem rerum. Voluptatem praesentium quod aut consectetur velit. Iusto alias ut id recusandae id vel earum.

Distinctio nihil corrupti nihil inventore. Illum aut cupiditate numquam qui velit impedit ab. Enim sed et pariatur facilis. Omnis sequi eum corporis et aspernatur nihil. Praesentium aut labore reiciendis assumenda aut dicta. Eos at enim qui quas aspernatur maiores ducimus.

Est dicta ad quia et. Exercitationem itaque illum est voluptas id iure ipsum voluptates. Natus odio alias commodi provident dolor sunt odit.

Neque libero ut est commodi. Eos explicabo hic dicta voluptas et excepturi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”