College Rankings - Ease of Placement
This list ranks colleges by how easy it is to place from the school. It takes into account per capita placement, competition, culture, and recruiting as nondiversity.
Tier 1 - Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford
Tier 2 - Dartmouth, MIT
Tier 3 - Columbia, UChicago, Wharton
Tier 4 - Penn CAS, Brown, Duke, Northwestern
Tier 5 - Cornell, Williams, Amherst, Caltech
Tier 6 - Georgetown, Michigan, Emory, WashU, Notre Dame
Tier 7 - UVA, Berkeley, USC, UT, Vanderbilt
Tier Hardo or Bust - NYU Stern, IU Kelley
Debatable list, but placements aren't important regardless. Rearranged in order of prestige - you're welcome
Tier Apex - Wharton
Tier 1 - Harvard, Yale, Caltech
Tier 2 - Princeton, Stanford, MIT
Tier 3 - Columbia, UChicago, Penn CAS
Tier 4 - Dartmouth, Duke, Notre Dame, Georgetown
Tier 5 - Cornell, Brown
Tier 6 - Michigan, Stern, UVA, Williams, Amherst
------ Doesn't really matter past this point so going to lump them together for convenience----
Tier 7 - Berkeley, USC, UT, Vanderbilt, IU Kelley, Emory, WashU, Northwestern
Much worse list than OP’s. If you’re ranking schools by prestige just use USNews lol:
Nobody, even in finance, considers Georgetown and ND to be more prestigious than Cornell, Brown, and Northwestern.
i chose georgetown over both cornell & northwestern - am i screwed?
Sorry you didn’t get into Princeton, but bagged CalTech, LowCaliber
Hi LowCaliber, just wanted to let you know that I have the urge to kill myself every time you post or comment
Rudy is your favorite movie huh
Putting Williams on par with UVA & Michigan should be criminal. And you’re not 6’3 bud. You’re probably 5’7. Being on this website all day, I would expect that you’d at least have accurate info.
Never heard of a caltech grad ever lol
No one in Caltech would ever want to do banking. They are way too smart for that.
Washu down 1. Since when was it better than Vandy?
Gtown up 1, Wahsu down 1, Caltech shouldn't even be on the list, NESCAC down 1 maybe, Wharton up 1
yes man, totally agree. Wharton should honestly be tier 1 since this is a finance forum, insane placement by simply looking at a career report, and best pre-professional atmosphere.
I disagree in terms of ease of placement. I go to Wharton and recruiting is already insanely competitive going against all of the Wharton kids, but you also have to understand that there are CAS, SEAS, Dual Degree (Huntsman, Vagelos, M&T) kids also recruiting, along with students that have insanely strong nepo/connections or diversity (so, so many women at Wharton gun for IB). All of this makes it difficult to compete for the top BBs, any EB, or buyside job. I’m not saying that you can’t get a IB job from Wharton (lol) but I’m saying that I have to do SO much more compared to a kid from another target school with less comp.
UIUC Gies should be on this list. Sneaky underrated and a top target for Chicago IB.
Cmon now.
The overall school isn’t too interested in IB, but kids who do want IB can place well very easily in Chicago. UIUC also has very strong brand name.
I might be biased but NYU Stern should be top in terms of ease of placement lol half those guys go into banking or PE
Im a current sophomore at Stern and can attest to the exact opposite. The school is genuinely a hardo hellhole and fucks your gpa with the stern curve so you cant even transfer. Every club is so competitive and toxic, you literally have to grind techs freshman year to even have a chance. Dont even let me get started on how alumni don’t respond to emails and how hard recruiting as non diverse from stern is.
z
Bro the stern curve is literally 30% A/A- which is 3.7+, plus more than half your classes aren't stern curved bc of gen eds and electives, if your gpa isn't good enough for transferring either you fucked up and should've taken easier electives or you're below top 30% of your class, at which point you're probably not qualified to get into banking lmao (since only like 10% of people make it). Removing the stern curve and letting half the fucking school have a 3.8+ won't solve jack shit because banks aren't suddenly gonna open up more seats.
There's way more seats than club members, and clubs regularly cut tons of people in their programs, so the people who are in when recruiting comes around are naturally among the top candidates without considering club connections. And yeah the response rate sucks but that's only because everyone at stern is concentrated on gunning for the same few roles and firms, if you look literally anywhere other than top BB/EB the alumni are pretty good.
I'm in your class and went through the same recruiting cycle as you, almost everyone I know who wanted banking got it. You can chalk some of it as luck, but the Stern curve is literally a direct comparison of you against the rest of the class, and if it gives you a shit outcome then really what does that say about you as a candidate.
to be honest, Cornell is definitely in Tier 4 since per capita placement is in the same ball-park as northwestern and Brown just by looking at the percentage from PeakFrameWork. The school also has arguably a more expansive and stronger network across the street. It does have a larger undergrad size, but everyone knows that it is more of a tech-inclined school. More people at Cornell pursue STEM than at any of the other schools on this list, aside from Stanford, Princeton, and MIT, arguably. I am a non-diversity Asian male at Cornell, and what I see is that similar profiles all landed in great BB/EB, even PE/HF as long for top non-diversity males, and in the worst case landed with a MM. If we want to take into account positions like SNT, Cornell is top target given its strong STEM program and network.
Dartmouth and Chicago should be moved a tier down. Even-though the two schools are relatively small in student size, they have so many students pursuing business linked majors like Economics while volume on the Wall Street is not comparable to that of Wharton and Columbia. Simply put, Dartmouth is not above Wharton, and Chicago is not in the same league as both Columbia and Wharton. These seem conflicting. This is what I would recommend:
Tier 1 - Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Wharton
Tier 2 - MIT (lack network but high prestige and zero competition for ib), Stanford (lack of network in East Coast, tier 1 for west coast)
Tier 3 - Penn CAS, UChicago, Dartmouth, Duke
Tier 4 - Cornell, Brown, Northwestern
(Agree with the rest of the list)
U missed Stanford
Wharton up 1 and cornell up 1
NYU isn't truly hardo or bust, be for real.
Hardo or bust should be reserved for state schools / non-targets.
tier 1: hysw tier 2: penn cas columbia mit tier 3: uchicago (deflation + chicago offices) northwestern a/w (inflation + high per capita$
you miss p in tier 1
Brown?
mb p is tier 1 if not high tier 2… i saw someone say online that evercore doesnt actively hire from pton dont know the validity
brown might be tier 2/3 j bc i think less people are going there for ib. worst i see is tier 4 j bc recruiting prolly isnt as strong there
what do you think about cornell. evecore takes 7-8 students from cornell each year. i get the large undergrad size mean, but my experience is that finance is the number 2 thing, much higher proportion of students here pursue STEM. it also seems to have similar per-capita placement as brown and northwestern according to peakframework (cornell:1.15%, brown: 0.86%, northwestern: 1.04%).
its simply because cornell has much more interest in finance than brown and northwestern, but places virtually the same with more competition than the other two
there is arguably no source saying that Cornell places virtually the same with the other two. As a matter of fact, it places two times more in volume per basically all available sources, peakframework, linkedin, college transition. As a student who attend Cornell, I can affirm you that the proportion of students entering finance is lower than that entering tech than Brown and Northwestern most definitely.
Method of checking your source: Linkedin -> School (Cornell, Northwestern, Brown) -> Search "Incoming 2025 investment banking summer analyst" -> Let me know the numbers.
Lol dude i went to neither brown nor northwestern but pretty much everyone considers them above cornell (a glorified state school with a >30% acceptance rate in RD rounds for certain colleges). Its pretty funny to see you defend cornell so vehemently and even make full blown posts about 'cornells misconceptions'. No hate tho
What are you noodling on about... Northwestern doesn’t even win the cross admit battle against Cornell despite Northwestern offering more aid on average. A younger cousin of mine literally just chose Cornell over Northwestern even though it was $20k more a year.
People are so fucking weird with the Cornell hate.
Both brown and northwestern have been higher ranked than cornell for the last 20 years man. Both schools are more selective, more prestigious, and place far better into finance per capita (while having 100x less competition than cornell). Cornell gives out guaranteed transfers to hundreds of community college students every year, and the average SAT for the state funded schools are abysmal compared to brown / northwestern.
Lastly, if you werent obviously aware, parchment cross admit data is very flawed (it has washu over columbia, and washu = yale for example; it's all self reported BS), but since you want to use that, take a look at northwestern and brown's cross admit percentages vs cornell's against HYPSM + columbia/dartmouth/penn. Northwestern and Brown have higher cross admit percentages than Cornell against every single one of the schools that I just mentioned. The cornell cope is getting old these days lol.
del
ngl, it really sounds like you attended Northwestern because someone who goes to either Brown or Princeton will not say something stupid or insecure like this. Brown and Northwestern simply do not have same selectivity, prestige, or namesake in finance. Northwestern has the same selectively as Cornell's entire school (FYI, none of Cornell's undergrad colleges have a >30% acceptance rate in the RD round when the highest individual college acceptance rate is 17.6% for SHA, and there is no way RD number can be higher than the total number). In the meantime, Cornell's private portion basically trumps in prestige/selectivity, academics than Northwestern, and on par with most other ivy league schools. Simple linkedin search you would find that Cornell's presence in every firm at Wall Street far exceed Northwestern, Brown, and in fact many other peer schools. Like I've told you, you overestimated the amount of people at Cornell doing finance: there is much more people pursuing technology/CS, more entrepreneur (rank 5 by Pitchbook), and more billionaires (5th by Forbes).
I wish you the best in finance industry, and I hope that whenever you meet a Cornell colleague or Cornell MDs (which there are so many on the street) or doing a deal with someone from Cornell, please refer them to as fake ivy/state school grad. It seems like you have a strong opinion of this and this is your firm belief.
move wharton to tier 1, move cas up to tier 2, move w/a to tier 3 because per capita placement esp for eb
Shit list. How many kids were sent from Tier 1 to Natixis? Ya that’s what I thought.
Just commenting here even if unrelated.
Does anyone know why I am not able to star my own discussion anymore? I’m new to WSO, have started a discussion but now an error pops out when I try to do it.
What am I missing?
I’d bump Georgetown and Michigan up a tier and drop Amherst down. I think both are stronger as schools and for recruiting purposes than Amherst.
You have no idea what you are talking about, but many don't when it comes to LACs (this is not a shot at you; there is an information gap concerning this topic). Regarding schools, Amherst/Williams > Georgetown/Michigan every day of the week for academics and "prestige." Academically, they align with the Ivy+ for undergrad education and Med/Law/MBA/PhD placement. Again, not from a name-brand perspective but from an educational one.
For recruiting, once you enter the real world and escape the echo chamber of your school/wso, you will see how top LAC alum are fanatics for their kids and will pull harder than almost anyone (especially regarding buy-side recruiting). There is a strong argument for A/W to be moved up to tier 3 for ease of placement.
Guilty as charged on not knowing anything about LAC’s. Good on them for placing their students well if they actually do. I’ve just never really had a lot of exposure to them or the whole NESCAC world. I know a lot of people who were successful from Ivy+ schools (mainly Cornell, Duke, Penn, some Columbia, and a few at HYP), and then from places like Michigan, Georgetown, and NYU. Going back to high school (I’m from the NYC area), those are the places where a lot of the academically qualified people I knew went (some also went to semi-targets like Emory, etc.), so I’ve never really had any insights there. Then again, I don’t really know as many people who went to Dartmouth or UVA, and both are obviously great for finance. At the end of the day, it comes down to your own social, and literal, geography.
As someone who chose Amherst over both Georgetown and Michigan, I sincerely hope you're wrong.
HOOK EM MOTHERFUCKAS 🤘
I chose USC over UMich. Was that a mistake?
both are similar umich def is a target but comp for pe/ib is egregious in itself
Michigan places better into NYC though, in my experience. It has an extremely strong network, and geographically, is closer.
Natus dolorum provident a sed. Pariatur et impedit commodi accusamus. Pariatur vero nulla omnis modi suscipit est. Optio reiciendis aliquid magni nihil non nam corrupti. Accusantium recusandae qui adipisci rem sit enim autem.
Nisi esse impedit ut corrupti aperiam maxime. Ullam quas nihil voluptas ullam corporis officiis asperiores. Corrupti maxime quo repellat iure consectetur error. Sunt esse rem qui quidem. Deleniti quo numquam nam veritatis necessitatibus. Harum ipsa non consequatur dignissimos et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Nisi et est fugit tempora repudiandae nihil sit. Occaecati quo perspiciatis eveniet. Velit nihil necessitatibus ab tenetur repellendus. Ducimus aut id et numquam aut exercitationem. Vel dolore quam amet omnis voluptatem est optio cumque.
Ut et molestiae enim. Aperiam voluptas eum sunt porro voluptatem aliquam deserunt.
Quia tempora qui optio voluptatem doloribus corrupti et architecto. Reiciendis possimus sunt et illum. Voluptas quia omnis saepe quos. Et quod soluta perferendis et.