Q&A: I am a Hedge Fund recruiter
I work with equity L/s arms of the multi-managers and single managers. A little about me: I don't come from typical financial services major nor have I ever wanted to be an IP myself. All the same, I love my job and don't wouldn't trade it or my firm for the world. Happy to answer some questions as best I can.
Do you have any experience with global macro HF recruiting (interest rates in particular)? If so, please describe...
The global macro hedge fund space is in a funky spot in terms of onboarding right now. I think it's in part to do quant easing - PM's are hesitant to carve out cap for new talent because 1. returns may or may not take a hit due to QE and 2. they don't want to vet an analyst in this environment.
I should have mentioned that I focus mostly on equity L/s funds and the L/s equity arms of multi strats. But funds like Brevan Howard and Garda have largely been shrinking their investment teams and their reasoning is consolidating "cap in a turbulent market". The real story ends up being that the PM / whole team posted poor returns in rates and said shops knee jerk their way out of the product until they think rates is stable again. They tend to bring in comparable talent and be second movers when rates calm down.
that's interesting. as an interest rates trader myself, i would argue that the current environment creates a different kind of trading opportunity within interest rates vs what has existed in the past...i understand that large established players in the market can get very confident in a strategy when it works (i've known a number of people that this describes)...and then the regime changes and the strategy stops working...this can cause immense frustration (and losses). I would hope that a hedge fund focused on absolute returns would be flexible enough to seek out new talent and ideas when this happens. I would raise my hand and say "i have an idea, and i think i'm potentially new talent...lets talk about it" but i'm not sure how to go about initiating that conversation, as i don't have the personal network to facilitate the introductions.
The story of the most incompetent person you had come across in your recruiting process.
I have a go to that doubles as the narrative behind why I focus on fundamental, investment oriented shops rather than quant and trading oriented.
I have not once but twice had a quant high frequency strat show up to a late stage interview with one of Citadel's quant equity businesses in jeans and a hoodie. I reamed him for it the first time but he blew me off and went BACK to interview after they had asked him to return when he was "feeling better" again in sleep wear. Freaking quants, man.
He's unemployed now.
This doesn't sound real lol.
Can I have his number? If the way someone dresses is your way of determining competence, good for you. I find it rather superficial. If someone is that good, as long as he wears underpants, I'm fine.
Thanks for doing this. A few questions, which have admittedly been answered before on here but thus the answers to which may be outdated; additional perspectives are always good anyway:
1b. Is analyst ranking as important as deal experience? My view would be that ranking is important mostly for initial screens by HHs but deal experience matters more in interviews; please correct me if I'm wrong.
Thanks again!
I may catch some flak for this but here's my honest advise / opinion.
1b. For a 1-3 year analyst ranking tends to carry some weight but if you've got sick deal experience (like underwriting for Facebook) then it may stack up even better. Each shop prioritizes experience differently and to be honest it's not as black and white as some of my colleagues asset it is. My gut wants to say ranking but I've seen lower ranked, bottom bucket analysts land at KKR after giving wonderfully detailed but comprehensive descriptions of their value added on recent deals. Emphasis on recent - you're only as good as your last trade.
Hope this helps! My account is new but if you want more color PM me and I'll get back to you in 2 dyas when the timer is lifted from my PM's
Thanks for taking questions, I'm sure I'm not alone in wanting to hear what recruiting is like for the buy-side coming from the sell-side.
Any sectors in particular that you work with most or mostly generalist stuff? Sounds like you have done Quant placement, any Fundamental? If so, how often is it purely Fundamental vs. "Quantamental"?
And I'm paraphrasing an existing thread here, but what is the current sentiment like as it pertains to hiring/expanding?
The current hiring market for fundamental, equity L/s HF's is somewhere between tepid and depressed. It's not a great time to have my focus. I began my career in quant as I work with a shop that built their career on quant but we have a fundamental practice that's been very successful int he past.
I'd say my forte is TMT, particularly tech. I've also had success in Healthcare and Industrials. I want consumer to make a come back as that's been quiet as of late and I've not had the chance to liquidate so many of my candidates that would take conversations.
Quantimental is a booming space but if a shop is has not "come out" as building out their quantimental effort yet then I, and I say I as I do a lot of our client side BD for my team, typically have to approach them and really grill them as to why they haven't tried it yet.
Tl;dr the sentiment is it's not a health market for entering HF's at the moment which is exactly why you should be looking. Good to open the dialogue with name brand shops and strong recruiters that will work with you opportunistically NOW rather than rush and slung like a product when the upswing hits.
This is great stuff! Thanks for the helpful insight, it is invaluable when wading through the process.
Which recruiting firms are best to work with for mid-level and senior professionals? Any to avoid, to be careful working with?
Hard to say given that firms are typically known for being good in products / sides of the cap structure rather than seniority. If you PM me I'd be happy to point you in the right direction with some more color on you but I'd hesitate to make that call on just seniority alone. In general I will say to stay away from the bulge bracket firms that do things other than financial services as they're cyclically focused and tend to trade not treat their candidates. My firm is an upper middle market firm that places emphasis on maintaining relationships. Definitely try to work with shops that follow that model.
Have you ever seen instances when a recruiter reported to a PM that one of his analysts is looking around to gain the PM's favor? Any other sketchy recruiter practices you've seen during your career?
No because at the end of the day you're burning more bridges than you build. The PM doesn't pay the recruiter so it'd be pretty stupid of the recruiter to try to get in the PM's pocket that way. Sketchy practices include: front running resumes and compensation before the candidate clears them to share, calling someone's desk feigning to be a client just to learn about performance or whoever works there, fibbing performance #'s just to get an interview, etc..Everything comes out in the wash though. Seasoned recruiters don't tend to do any of this as it's a huge risk for a short term reward.
How would you characterize the fundamental single manager funds out there that are in greatest demand by candidates these days?
Yes. Like 85% of people I speak with want single managers first choice and some are dead seat on that or nothing else
How is Equity Research viewed compared to IB for L/S Equity funds? What about MM vs. BB ER experience? Is it true that the analyst you work under matters more than the firm you work for?
What is the typical path to becoming a recruiter? Do former finance professionals move over to the recruiting side? How does comp stack up for the average recruiter?
Great question. Equity research is a stable bet post grad because you're likely to get a sector to cover earlier than and in IB. The reasoning for that I think is that IB management likes to give longer leashes to the bankers to source where as the researchers covering public clients are being sourced for business. So in an equity research seat you definitely specialize early on but aren't exposed to that breath of financial analysis that you do in IB which closes doors to the private equity and VC realms early on.
I don't think there's a real path but if we're talking post grad then probably any degree in communications, business, maybe eco or public affairs and speaking a second language is an enormous boon. Increases your TAM and makes you more relatable which is important to the job I feel.
I work with former bankers, institutional sales and tech analyst guys as well as entrepreneurs in market research and prop traders. It's an eclectic community and you can ease into it out of school or move laterally into it if you've got a great read on a few related communities - be it investment sectors or geographical or something.
What do u mean by TAM?
Have you seen an increase in traditional (value, macro, etc.) hedge funds hiring quants? If so, what roles have you seen quants be hired into?
Well I started my career in quant but it was recruiting with the large multi managers. There's certainly a need at a fee global multi managers for top tier quant talent but to be fair the same can be said at top tier IB's. Machine learning is a big to do there so if you're looking for an edge to a first conversation I would tailor your resume to highly any experience in that or like deep learning.
Are you hiring?
What every recruiter wants to know
Thanks for doing an AMA!
School is a player if you've never had a job before but being a transfer doesn't really matter. So long as you can get an initial conversation you're past whatever block there may have been. But I personally don't see any difference. Speaking two or more languages is a great edge to have. History and English degrees are not as sexy as some bring stem or commercial but again same point as before.
Thanks for doing this AMA. All else equal, do you think fundamental shops (particularly value oriented, although that's a broad category) tend to prefer a more junior candidate (say 2-5 years sell-side equity research experience) have all of their experience in one sector or have experience in a couple different sectors? I assume it comes down to whether the firm takes a generalist or sector specific approach with its analyst team. But would a generalist shop say no to a potentially good candidate if that person only had experience in one sector? Just wondering if one is more advantageous than the other.
Also, how important, or not important, is it for the fundamental shops you work with to get a candidate with a top MBA versus no MBA but, for example, have prior buyside, or at least relevant, experience in the sector(s) they're looking for as well as a CFA?
Specializing early is a big recruiting trend. It's better I think now and probably moving on its better to specialize early as we're trending towards sub sector coverage as a priority. It's hard to pitch a generalist as a specialist but it's easier to pitch the specialist as more of a generalist if they can pick up a few plug and play strats in related sectors.
Thanks again. While it sounds like it may be better to err towards specializing in one sector, do you think there are sectors that are too small (as a % of the total market) to specialize in or too unique to be able to then "plug and play" strats in other sectors as you mention?
Can you think of instances where you placed people from outside of finance in HF?
How about specifically 1) bigLaw corporate/m&a/securities associates 2) programmers from the big tech companies?
Assuming you mean as a front office job? Marketing / sales can come from the corporate world. There are people at Tencent that have come and left from funds. Programmers can pretty easily through industries tbh
Definitely interested in the process for finding institutional sales / wholesalers / relationship management roles. Do these even exist at hedgies or is it more a marketing or PR function?
Thanks for doing this. Interested to hear how your HF clients tend to view Asset Management/long-only experience? I imagine the CFA is less meaningful to HFs, but given the similarity in job function (if strategies are similar), do long-only junior candidates get much traction in the hedge fund space? Does staying too long in long-only label you a sleepy mutual fund investor? Any insight would be greatly appreciated
I mean CREFs and Epochs are not sexy early on because of kind of how far it is from the hedge fund model. But there's nothing stopping any IP from developing sound L/s strats along side of what's on paper. Really makes you stand out if you manage to. So really when any candidate has back pocket relevant experience then I'm able to spin that into a conversation.
But in general it's a square peg square hole lens for hiring managers. Not saying people always know what they want but if you're not an obvious pitch on paper then it's up to the candidate and recruiter to pitch to the hiring manager rather than the hiring manager open the kimono.
Thank you for the AMA. Typical idea on the street goes that in order to go into HF or PE one must do their time of at least 2 years in IB and then start. However, have you ever seen canidates from different backgrounds such as corporate finance, or consulting and have been sucessfull in landing the job? If yes, what woud you say had helped them land the job? Thank you
It's not common but middle market funds bring on portfolio analyst from corporate finance sometimes. Depending on what you consult on its possible but I haven't personally done a deal like that.
Follow on question to this: what types of consulting have you seen make the switch? There's a lot of talk on this forum of MBB strat consultants moving around, but outside that segment there's a constellation of others (transformation shops, deep ops/process reengineering, etc) that don't get as much press. Any general/specific bits of information are useful.
In your experience, is it more significantly more difficult for someone to break into a fundamental HF from lower middle market PE vs. upper middle market PE (assuming that in both cases the person had done BB IB) beforehand? For the purposes of this question, we'll define lower middle market as a fund that is investing out of a $300-600mm fund and upper middle market as a fund investing out of a $1bn-4bn fund.
In general it's just easier to get conversation if you have a brand name shop and school post grad but returns and sector knowledge are more important than what's on the cv. If you've got substance and a lot of evidence of value added then you should be able to have the recruiter layer on when they pitch you as a candidate.
If I am in Fixed Income PMG what types of hedge funds should I look to get into down the line? What types of credentials (other than CFA) should I get?
Own a few sectors. If you intend on staying in portfolio management then pick up python or c++ so you're reliant on a 25 year old by the time you want to hop to the shop you want to stay at for good. There aren't many important roles in the middle market within PMG so you either need to be best in class at fundamental analysis or pick up some quant skills.
Do you have a recommendation between python and C++? What resources do you recommend to learn those languages? +1 SB btw.
What are the different components you evaluate when looking at 1st year IBD analysts for positions at fundamental equity L/S HFs?
School, ranking, pay bucket, deal experience, how they comport themselves on the phone and in person. Young IP's don't have track records so you look for strong signs of growth. Also having some investment thesis of public names already is a great back pocket ace.
.
Couple questions, thanks for doing this.
1) How important is GPA? Is a 3.5 good enough to get a conversation/interview?
2) And what do you feel is the best path to HF's (i.e.. IB -> HF, IB ->PE ->MBA -> HF, etc.)
3) What are some really interesting things (other than bank/school, deal experience/group ranking) really piques your interest and the interest of L/S fund managers?
GPA's important to top tier shops looking at post grads.
There is no best path to a fund because funds all have different mandates. Either IB or equity research from my perspective. I don't do much in credit but if you don't know exactly what fund and vertical you want to cover then do IB to get more exposure to modeling and being commercial.
Being polished on the phone and in person. Having interests outside of investing. Being able to connect with someone beyond just talking about a job. Stressing the will to learn.
Thanks for the response. One small follow up on GPA, how much would it matter for directly going from IB -> HF (ideally just staying in the industry without MBA)? Especially if I'm not looking at MF's above $15 billion? (Let's say the target range is a good L/S HF between $2B and $10B AUM)
In your experience, what would be the criteria for a successful transition from credit research at a CRA to a macro HF at the analyst level?
I think it might be helpful for everyone if you described the differences between working at a single manager and multi-manager and why single managers are viewed as being so much more desirable (I'm in this camp) by people who actually work in the industry.
As a banking analyst many tend to think Citadel or Point72 are the top places to work because you don't know any better...
Sure. Single manager funds give you chance to explore more about the product and garner tangential experience where as the platforms are more plug and play oriented. It takes a high bar of confidence in your abilities to perform in that environment. More over, multi managers come with the risk of shedding teams that were up but didn't perform well enough to warrant their existence over more cap allocated to a top performing group. But to the credit of multi managers, they offer rare opportunities for people to link up with industry leading talent without needing a prior relationship.
There's a lot that can be said to differentiate the two but I think the single managers are largely in demand because people are concerning about turn over at the platforms but if you've got 10/100 teams shed from Citadel and 1/10 analysts shed from a single manager in a year is it really that much more volatile?
Its a lot more volatile. For one I think 10% turnover is low for the multimanagers (one of them has 30%+). For another most single managers don't fire analysts on the spot, you're more likely to be 'encouraged to leave' and given time to figure things out
I was referring more to the nature of the work... being an analyst focused on covering a handful of names, spending potentially months doing deep work vs. covering more names / short term trading / shallow knowledge, risk guys looking over your shoulder etc.
.
How dificult is to move from pure coinvest PE fund to L/S HF? The skill set is super relevant but it appears that perception is more important that actual skills.
Are Equity Research guys limited to only L/S funds? Thanks.
It's the sensible fit - they're not as exposed to the full breadth of modeling that IB's are. The IB track keeps more doors open in exchange for less sector knowledge off the bat. I haven't seen equity research names hop into PE personally.
how do small prop traders get into PM seats at large multi-manager firms like Millennium, Tudor, Brevan, etc... ?
insane returns / working with legends / networking
.
Can you get me a job?
That's the general idea
could you look at my resume and critique it?
i don't believe you are a HF recruiter.... you can prove it to me by getting me a job at a fund!
Sneaky
well it was worth a shot haha
Are personal account track records helpful to show? Thanks
More is always better. Performance talks
How can one from a STEM background best leverage themselves to break into hedge funds? I am obtaining my Ph.D in malaria vaccine development from 2 top tier unis and have done an internship in business development plus work part time in venture capital.
healthcare investment banking or equity research and transitioning to a hedge fund thereafter.
What are the best options coming from a MM shop doing DCM? Do you think possible breaking into smaller shops, or is it better to transfer to BB and then recruit? Also, any knowledge on recruiting for special situations/distressed shops?
As a incoming college freshman here are couple questions: Is there a preference for college major for L/S HFs? Also, for someone graduating 4 years from now, do you have any general thoughts on shifts in HF (entire industry, not just L/S) hiring preferences (will there be a greater preference for quantitative backgrounds)? Thanks a ton
This is great and thanks for doing this. There seems to be a trend among the fundamental teams at very large multi-managers toward recruiting (at least partially) directly out of undergrad (P72, Citadel, etc...). Are single manager funds/lower-profile funds also recruiting directly out of college? Do any recruiters work with clubs/individuals out of colleges?
Ekoa I am a software developer, not the quantitate developer or the quant research type. I have already messaged a decent amount of people at hedge fund such as recuriters, hr people, developer at places like Bridgewater Associates, D.E Shaw, Renaissance Technologies hoping to network and get a job but received no responses. How can I network better if you may know. Thanks.
Is this thread still alive anyone know?
Do you ever place equity guys in macro mandates? Just was wondering what kind of overlap some of the L/S arms of say moore, brevan, etc have with their liquid market macro teams
Any insights on the Asian HF job market and differences with the US? After two years of IBD in HK/SG, what would be the best course of action/best spin to land at a L/S in Asia?
I hear all the time that CFA for hedge funds isn't relevant. Is this true and why do you think that is given that the body of knowledge in the CFA program is completely relevant to an equity L/S? Note: I'm not saying that having the CFA pre-qualifies someone, I'm saying I don't understand why I hear that it is irrelevant.
Hi all, I didn't anticipate this much traction - I'll check in later this afternoon. Thanks for the interest!
could you quantify "insane returns"?
For example, assuming starting with a 100k trading account...trading a strategy that could scale to a billion $ portfolio (with the appropriate slippage / execution costs), what are the minimum numbers needed (P/L, max drawdown, risk, etc...)?
How does recruiting from overseas (London/Asia) offices to NY work? In your experiences, is it common and have you seen successful cases?
Thanks for the AMA,
I am an Analyst at a research firm and I have 4 years of global macro research.
Got a BA in Economics, made a few good directional calls, and I code Python.
Interested in going into a Global Macro fund.
What is my path here? Should I use a headhunter?
what is the % mix of people from IB / ER / long-only to the LS equity hedge funds that you cover, in general?
would you highly recommend long-onlys to move to the "fundamental" hedge funds rather than RV?
how often do you see people leaving long-onlys to relative value / LS (such as Millennium)?
what is your appetite to source people from New York to London/Hong Kong and vice versa?
Thanks for doing this. Do you have any advice for managing the flow of headhunter interest? To be specific, I frequently get emails from people telling me about how many L/S clients they have that would be interested in my background etc. While I have no desire to move right this moment, I would like to create a pipeline of backups such that I can seamlessly move into a new seat should my current PM blow up randomly.
How would you manage this situation? Talk to them or not at all? Send them your resume? I'm less inclined to do either of those things as I wouldn't want to jeopardize my current job (my shop is pretty ruthless when they find out people are even thinking about elsewhere), but I'd still like those backups to avoid being out in the cold for 6mo.
Hi, thanks for doing this AMA! Do you have any tips for IB Associates trying to transition into HF? Is there an inherent prejudice towards junior IB analysts (from both recruiter and PM standpoint), and how would you recommend overcoming that hurdle? Thanks!
Are behavioral interviews more or less important than a candidate having a solid resume and knowing their shit?
Common dos and don'ts that you take note of during behavioral interviews?
What would you recommend to people interested in getting into internal wholesaling, and then ideally external a few years following, out of college?
What is the best way for an undergrad to reach out to a HF? Call, email, email with pitch, etc. Thanks!
Quisquam voluptate et voluptas aut quod dolores corrupti. Nam corporis est exercitationem. Nihil enim voluptatem distinctio qui ut perferendis qui. Deleniti eligendi accusamus est et. Soluta natus consectetur deserunt aut perspiciatis cupiditate enim. Eum rem consectetur iure aliquid beatae qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Cupiditate sit in voluptate natus necessitatibus maiores vel. Voluptates aliquam quibusdam nulla illum. Quidem sint qui vitae placeat suscipit necessitatibus nesciunt. Sit consequatur debitis aut quae soluta. Mollitia accusamus rerum quae fugiat ad eveniet voluptates. Ad ea tempore tempora esse explicabo inventore sequi.
Sunt quia sit vero sit ex ut et aut. Quis ut exercitationem vel cupiditate aut enim repellendus. A dolorem esse sit necessitatibus.
Officiis mollitia quod sed. Iure accusamus ipsa quia quae.
Incidunt et fugiat et quam. Sit doloremque maxime corrupti rerum placeat sunt. Eligendi quo magnam occaecati et. Exercitationem minima voluptas ea expedita. Reprehenderit dicta nesciunt magnam minima dolor error est in. Nulla quam quis earum quae in.
Necessitatibus et vero sint quo. Voluptatum delectus quia et sed et corrupti. Maxime aut mollitia culpa cumque ipsam necessitatibus ipsum. Est temporibus quam et in. Aut consequatur et corrupti ullam quia vero odit reiciendis.
Rerum dignissimos sunt esse quod modi quasi. Delectus quidem quis culpa repellat. Voluptatem blanditiis dolorum libero commodi quo. Aut aut tempora atque iste dolorem fugit molestias.
Voluptate rerum numquam repellat omnis corrupti voluptatum est. Ipsum nihil quo suscipit. Voluptas quo saepe soluta esse voluptatem necessitatibus maiores nulla.
Est consequatur consequatur et hic sint. Rerum nulla animi repellendus omnis mollitia dolore. Nesciunt aut et ipsum dolorem repellendus rerum aspernatur.
Corrupti beatae nemo molestiae. Facilis esse et dolorem rerum corporis velit ut optio. Dolore vero nobis vero voluptas facere temporibus est.
Quia aut minima omnis eligendi totam veritatis quasi. Quas est qui quia quia sit modi et. Quos nesciunt fugit ut quia sed aut. Veritatis autem consequatur pariatur commodi autem odio.
Molestias et dolores eos ut sed. Tempore optio quaerat quos quaerat. Incidunt ipsum enim molestiae at cumque explicabo.
Ut ipsum id autem deleniti est. A ut velit dolores quis et. Eum maiores velit quasi voluptatum. Minus harum aperiam qui vitae.