Valuation multiples across different industries - Similar scenarios for different industries?

When calculating multiples for comparable company analysis, which multiples are used specifically for certain industries and which are specifically not used for certain industries? I know that EBITDA isn't used for financial institutions because a large portion of their revenues comes from interest. Are there any similar scenarios for different industries? Thanks

57 Comments
 

Second what analystforhire mentioned above. The most typical metrics involve Enterprise Value to compare across industries. There are things like EV/Total Subscribers for a telecom company or EV/3P Reserves for oil&gas companies. Other than EV, there are almost always a few very niche numbers that are really only observed on an industry-by-industry basis. For example, in the regulated utility space you could look at $/mW or in the metals & mining space you could observe price per ___ (e.g. "ton of steel").

Also, if you were looking specifically into something like commercial banks... you mentioned that they don't trade off of EBITDA, which is generally true. I would venture a guess that you'd want to look at something like Price/Tangible Book Value in this environment.

"You've got to belong to it."
 
Best Response

Not just valuation multiples vary across industry, but also certain operating metrics matter more in certain industries than others.

For example, inventory turns is quite important in retail, MLR (medical loss ratio) is really important in health insurance.

Also, you should still use the other traditional multiples. For example, you could find that EV/EBITDA is the same, but that EV/# total beds is lower (so the business is making less EBITDA per bed, i.e. less efficient than competitors). So if you were a value-add shop or a strategic with better operating efficiency, you could say "hey, I'm going to buy that business, improve operations, and capture that additional value". Sometimes the difference in efficiency can be explained but sometimes it cannot (ideally, you have an explanation for it and a fix).

 

For mining,

EV/Proven + Probable, EV/Proven + Probable + M&I and then EV/PP + M&I + inferred - companies with larger amounts of reserves are in general going to trade at higher multiples than those with resources since they're going to be trading higher.

Cost per oz - self explanatory

Market cap/NAV - you'll see this a lot in the royalty space. Companies with larger portfolios of royalties will trade at a higher premium to the NAV of the royalty streams.

 
Aspirantmorningstar.com,

Just pick a representative company from the industry and click the Valuation tab - you'll see a comparison of industry and market multiples

Thanks. SB if I could.

 

mrb87 - sorry, should of phrased this question better. In my current job i'm focused on a specific industry and wanted to know what multiples would best reflect the underlying economics on a company.. going to change the title

 

Industries with a lot of CapEx hence DA and varying capital structures will tend to use EV/EBITDA to get an apples to apples comparison. Other industries with similar capital structures and relatively little CapEx i.e. banks will go with P/E multiples

 

Actually banks aren't getting valued on either these days. They are getting valued on if the market thinks they will be around next month or not since nobody knows what their real book value is or what their real earnings power is.

 

Bump. I'd like to add: Why would you ever subtract CapX from EBITDA, and why are we concerned with playing around with Capx in regards to EBITDA in the first place - how does that make a better multiple?

 

CapEx doesn't hit the income statement - it shows up as depreciation through time.

But - you need to make capital expenditures to keep the business going / keep it profitable.

Also, some companies choose to lease equipment, which is not capitalized, and that shows up on the income statement. Generally this is only smaller, private companies though.

 

You will use EBITDAR in companies that have sale and lease backs or large capital leases. In these companies, the R is really just a type of interest, its the way they have capitalized the company. So, you remove the R when its a capital structure issue not an operating issue.

EBITDA-Capex, as has been said is a cashflow multiple. This is important in companies like industrial companies where capex is very important as an earnings driver. That is, one company may be spending a ton of money on capex and thus earning a lot of money, another may be spending no capex dollars and earning less (but be better on a cashflow basis). D&A is supposed to be a proxy for maintenance capex, not for growth capex.

--There are stupid questions, so think first.
 

P/CY06E EPS for commercial aero is running at around 18.4x vs. 15.7x for the defense space and 15.3x for the S&P. FV/CY06E EBITDA for commercial aero is running at around 10.3x vs. 8.7x for defense. Large aero acquisition multiples are at 9-15x FV/EBITDA, while defense edge them out at 10-16x.

Because of the long product cycle we also look at orders and build rates in anything involving planes/ships. Finally, remember there's the all-important government factor. For that we consider the projected defense budget and the expected size of various projects/platforms that are specific to each company. No small feat.

(You know how recruiters are always telling you how much you'll learn in this business? Well, this is the kind of shit you learn in this business.)

 
Mis IndRelax. Don't pretend to know anything you don't know. Don't be afraid of not knowing. Be friendly and teachable.
agreed...they'd much rather you admit you don't know and ask for help(in the future), than have you take a whack at it and have you screw something up
 

agreed, the danger is that either i) they're genuinely impressed and start to get deeper into a discussion around concepts/ valuation nuances or ii) they smell a rat and decide to test you. Outcome of both is that you'll quickly get out of your depth and lose any points you'd gained. Showing you've done research as you're interested in a particular area is a good thing, but a general knowledge is more impressive.

 

UMich, don't let this small incident discourage you. Now you're one experience richer. Build on this experience! It's not the end of the world!

One of my favorite banks has basically advised me not to bother applying for a full-time position as I didn't click with an interviewer when I interviewed for an internship position earlier this year. Yeah, I'm pretty down as this is ridiculous...

But you know what? Another bank thinks I'm good :-)

Moral: Never stop trying!

 

Iusto earum sed incidunt est id. Libero eos occaecati sit blanditiis accusantium architecto. Quaerat blanditiis alias et saepe repellat. Quod molestiae accusantium voluptatem ipsum reiciendis consequatur.

Explicabo soluta magni laboriosam inventore. Magni ut odio consequatur dolorem eos. Dolore sed fuga sint. Exercitationem consequatur autem sunt voluptas.

Consectetur ut minus eius repudiandae quidem sequi ut. Iusto optio cumque totam ratione amet quia quasi.

Qui adipisci dolorem nisi nulla tenetur. Qui expedita nam cupiditate assumenda. Fuga nobis asperiores quo. Quas mollitia ea nihil maiores non.

---------------- Account Inactive
 

Et laudantium dolorem autem numquam. Exercitationem sunt rerum enim dolores dolore omnis. Reiciendis blanditiis quia distinctio nobis quia totam.

Commodi accusantium iste at. Magnam molestiae at iure delectus fugiat. Occaecati ut dolor cumque esse et vero est. Qui voluptas similique non veniam.

Est et id molestias corrupti rerum. Voluptas maxime et saepe pariatur reiciendis. Facilis aut consequatur sit ea ut odit aut ducimus.

Dolore sequi esse vel facere temporibus. Sint deserunt iste et ea unde. Debitis ea ex pariatur doloremque. Quia error voluptates alias cupiditate facere et. Iusto necessitatibus distinctio porro cum.

 

Perspiciatis aut quos commodi ad laborum rerum earum. Eligendi adipisci molestiae voluptatem repellat quam expedita quasi. Perferendis pariatur voluptatibus vel dolor est ut. Placeat doloremque voluptatem eos sit.

Vel quia esse expedita non qui id labore. Ipsam ex quisquam sint impedit doloribus ipsam animi nulla.

Sed sunt similique voluptates velit sequi ut nihil. Modi rerum inventore exercitationem autem aut ex nisi enim. Eos voluptatem accusamus quia deleniti veritatis repellendus. Aspernatur blanditiis deserunt voluptas natus illum. Veniam aperiam debitis dolorem in vel recusandae. Asperiores reiciendis et qui laboriosam iure eveniet. Soluta harum et sapiente.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (77) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (71) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”