Which industry group is the most interesting?
I'm currently working in Tech M&A (with a focus on software companies) and thus far it has proven incredibly boring. As if the typical drudgery of banking wasnt enough, I havent managed to get my head round all the technical jargon that gets thrown around in my group (I still have no fucking clue what "optimised systems integration" really means). As you can imagine the hours I spend googling just to work out what a company actually does adds all the more frustration to my job.
So I was just wondering which industry group would you say is the most enjoyable/offers the most interesting work?
I actually enjoy tech M&A..and i focus on IDM so far. But I came from an engineering background so I was very used to it.
But it really depends on what you like, consumers/retail shouldn't have that much of the technical jargon if it's something you are concerned about
Which industry are you interested in? Go for that. There isn't one that is universally enjoyable - it's a personal preference. If you don't have any industry preferences, try going for a multi-industry product group like M&A, LevFin, etc.
I like project financing, so for me infra was a logical choice.
Consumer-Retail
why do you say Consumer-Retail?
Man... this is like asking "What's the best color?"
There should be some way to assess groups, like Energy & Financials get the most dealflow, and subsequently have to do the most work. All I want to know is which group wont leave me feeling like throwing myself off a tall building?
I always thought Defense & Aerospace M&A sounded pretty badass.
What about industrials? The business operations seem fairly intuitive and it has the added benefit of diversity by virtue of the inherent sub-groups (automotive, manufacturing etc).
try working in healthcare... that'll teach you to complain about jargons when u're figuring out what kind of lymphoma he company is trying to cure or what form of protein it's trying to formulate... i never took a single biology class in my life. Just be patient and read, talk to people and try to pick it up fast. No 2 ways about it... i don't think switching to another group will help that much, prob needa change the attitude. U're in a dream group many ppl on this forum want...
consumer retail!
Ha, no kidding ZIRH. Try writing a CIM for a medical technology company that develops and manufactures cerebral ultrasound devices... That'll make software M&A seem like a walk in the park.
I actually work in a software group and have worked on a variety of software deals (financings and M&A) and I really enjoy it. I think it's going to be highly dependent on where your interests lie.
Defense and Aerospace does sound badass. Surely deal flow must be high?
Eh. It's interesting, but deal flow, as with every group on the Street, is highly dependent on the group. If it's a good A&D group, then deal flow will be plentiful; if the A&D group sucks, then you'll be pitching 24-7.
Commercial aero is the interesting part of A&D (to me at least), but there's not a whole lot going on. Most will fall into defense services, which is essentially government IT. Not always terribly exciting/interesting.
I recently spoke with an A&D banker who worked with the company that developed the technology that helped to capture Osama Bin Laden. Pretty fucking badass if you ask me.
Agreed, A&D SOUNDS cool but a lot of it is more like who can provide the cheapest chemical toilets for troops in Afghanistan than making smart bombs and Predator drones. A lot of the coolest things I've ever looked at in relation to defense actually are banked by tech groups because they make the circuitry and other tech to enable . I also find the rhythm of the business, as driven by contracting cycles etc, to be super dull compared to a lot of other industries.
Media for moi.
tech is a very interesting industry, but you are just not qualified to analyze it. people with a background in their group's product area (i.e. EECS for tech) really understand the products they are researching in their respective groups, and they tend to like tir roles a lot more from what i've seen
Consumer-retail is the way to go
why consumer-retail may I ask?
Gaming/Casino
companies/products you interact with in your daily life - exactly the opposite of a tech or hc group that deals with microprocessor technology or heart valves
C&R is the easiest group to work in. Whenever you hear about bankers doing some extra shit on the side, like producing a rap album or starting a charity for kids, it's always the C&R guys.
You also need to consider which group will give you the product experience you want. There are some industry groups that mostly do equity, and others do a mix of stuff. At my bank, healthcare seems to concentrate on equity. So no matter how much I like it, my overall experience would be pretty limited. Whereas telecom at my bank does almost everything the experience there is more rounded.
Every industry group has its ups/downs
In terms of subject matter, TMT is probably the coolest
Healthcare is great if you like doing research haha
FIG will give you the best modelling skills
TMT might be interesting in the U.S. but in Europe it is pretty boring (I have worked there). The reason is that TMT is 70% Telecoms in Europe, because there is few tech companies. Telecoms are not that exciting, it is a very dull and slow-growth business. Also telecoms are headed for a long decline given Skype & co. Media is another declining business, because you have all these newspaper companies, which just suck. Technology can be pretty cool, but who believes that these companies are worth a dime in the first place. Most of them are pretty ridiculous internet start ups. Of course you are not allowed to say that you are IPOing the next pets.com.
clean tech
C&R is the easiest, but it is pretty boring in my opinion. I like O&G, but of course I'm a bit biased. Also, Consumer sucks because there is always a seemingly infinite list of companies you could be pitching even if you are executing quite a bit. Most of the people I know in Consumer are both miserable and bored, though I will say it would be pretty sweet to work on an M&A deal for some foreign beverage companies... that would be one transaction I would like to be a part of...
Kenny is spot-on with above... A&D growth mirrors the government defense budget. It's cool when you're talking about cruise missiles and F22's but it operates more so like your average industrials company.
Which industry is the most interesting / has the best future prospects? Real Assets (Infrastructure, Energy, RE) vs Technology? (Originally Posted: 02/27/2016)
Hi All,
I am currently in M&A at a top BB. I just want all your takes in terms of the best industry to get into right now, assuming I'm around 23 and in the beginning of my career. This is for choosing which buyside opportunities to look at.
The reason I am asking is because the two investing areas that have piqued my interest are very different, and it is very difficult to move from one to another. The first is real assets (natural resources, utilities, schools/hospitals, commercial, residential and industrial real estate, etc). Will be looking at RE and infrastructure funds for this. The second is high tech, big data, SaaS, shared economy, etc. Very interested in VC and the startup scene. On one end I am a very nuts-and-bolts guy, and I like being able to go touch my investment. On the other I like the lofty startup scene and chasing unicorn valuations, as many 20somethings do. It seems like everyone and their mom is into TMT these days...I'm worried that this will create an overcompetitive and oversubscribed environment for professionals in TMT-related investing.
I've spoken with professionals around me and everyone except people in real assets are saying tech is obviously cooler and will be more exciting in the future. Appreciate if some seasoned guys can give me their two cents. I know most of you guys are college freshman, but hey maybe your input is useful too. You can learn something from anyone these days.
So what do you guys think is more interesting? Which do you guys think will have the best opportunities in the next 10 years or so? Big questions, I know...but any response will do.
Bump?
You should know that infra and RE aren't really in the same buckets as other types of PE. Infra funds tend to look for more stable but lower yielding investments, so the risk profile is different. For that reason there is a bit of a stigma against it, but if you like it, screw what others think. RE can vary all over the board in terms of risk appetite and cost of capital, but most RE funds look for guys with RE experience (similar to how energy PE looks for guys with energy experience - they're just relatively specialized industries. That being said, I don't know any guys who work for RE funds who didn't do RE before, but I can think of a few who are in energy PE now that didn't do energy banking. Anecdotal evidence so YMMV). Also regarding tech, unicorns right now are getting their valuations destroyed (as it will happen when cycles turn).
Probably a bigger question outside of "which industry?" is "which job type?" Are you a people person who enjoys taking tons of initiative and building a network? Then VC/Growth Equity might be for you because the job is very sourcing driven. Are you more analytical and thrive in places where your role and responsibilities are more clearly defined? Then traditional buyout PE might be better.
That's a very good way to look at things. Yes, I am aware that there is some sort of stigma associated with REPE. But I didn't know there was that same stigma against Infra/power/energy?
The reason I'm here asking this ridiculously open ended question is quite frankly, I am both of those types. Now I just need information on what the market will look like for these two jobs (professionally). All else being equal, I want to be in an area where there is relatively sustained upside in market demand in the future, good compensation, and global opportunity (I may want to hop around the globe a bit).
It's tough at this juncture because I guess I want to keep all my options open, but once you go down the infra/re path I guess it'd be tough to crawl out without B-school. Infra mainly attracts me not on the basis of the asset class (although I do find it interesting) but in the sense that I can feel like I am actually building something, and everyday people will rely on the things invest in for everyday life as we know it.
There's good deal more certainty that you will always need infrastructure and real assets. Tech has a great deal more variance
Interesting...thanks. Anyone in either field (growth equity or Infra/RE PE) able to chip in?
Infrastructure/real assets has grown tremendously and will continue to do so- though I blame part of that recently on low yields. Institutional investors want cash yield and are buying infrastructure assets directly, creating competition and high valuations.
Long term - there's a growing need for major improvements/innovations in infrastructure. The question is how this need will be met - and that's the side of the table I'd want to be on. Regardless, funds who are good and participate in the space will grow and do well I believe. Just make sure your interested in it, because once you've gotten into that space it can be tough to move out of it.
Most interesting coverage groups (Originally Posted: 08/10/2010)
Not people-related, not firm-specific...just in terms of companies covered and industry dynamics, what do you think is the most interesting coverage group to work in today and why?
TMT
FIG.
not fig
As i know, FIG experience is not transferable to other groups... Any real FIG bankers care to elaborate?
it has something to do with the way you evaluate the banks assets (or liabilities)
only thing more specialized than fig within finance is probably memorizing bloomberg shortcut strokes
Technology Media Telecommunications! Emphasis on MEDIA.
FIG is most interesting in that it is most different. You care about different metrics covering FIG companies. Even within FIG, banks are very different from asset managers, which are very different from insurance companies, and so forth.
I work at a Life Insurer as an actuarial... how do you evaluate an insurance company, Embedded Value? i think it is impossible for a banker to calculate that , they lack the brain power hahaha just kidding, but seriously, it is impossible for them, assuming they know how, they lack the flows which are not public information..
TMT and Healthcare. Specifically, tech and biotech (respectively).
Always enjoyed vanilla industrials, primarily heavy manufacturing; a world without widgets is a sad world.
tech
Aerospace?
Not too fond of Industrials but damn, Aerospace and Defense is a great sector to work in. Fortunately for some of us here, associates and analysts can unofficially silo themselves into these sub-verticals right off the bat.
BMP (Brothels and Massage Parlors) is considered best at my bank. Group Head just can not stop smiling.
hahhah nice
This is an interesting question and, in my opinion, driven by 2 factors: 1. Where is activity in the economy occurring? 2. What does your particular bank do well and not so well?
Colds Areas: a. Commercial Real Estate b. Lodging/Gaming c. PE Sponsors ("Dry powder") d. TMT (yes, I disagree with Big Bucks and SF and happy to elaborate) e. Sales and Trading (Volcker rule anybody? Try finding a big prop desk these days)
Kevin, please elaborate on why you feel TMT is cold, or media & telecom in particular.
He's an idiot. No other industry has supported so many boutiques as tech has (Donald Lufkin Jenrette, Thomas Weissel, etc.) not to mention legendary groups GS TMT. Kid obviously works in bankruptcy or restructuring. Also its Oil > Energy.
Enim culpa impedit tempora velit sequi est animi quisquam. Consequatur aut architecto occaecati velit. Delectus veritatis voluptatum laudantium praesentium rerum placeat est minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Velit veniam pariatur nihil at. Omnis pariatur et mollitia. Vitae et quisquam et quis ipsum sapiente eum. Vero nemo tempora voluptatem recusandae. Impedit culpa sint debitis sapiente omnis dolorem rerum. Et reprehenderit id aut distinctio facilis quod et. Cumque ipsam aspernatur corrupti animi quaerat necessitatibus voluptatem.
Commodi assumenda nihil omnis aut occaecati sunt deserunt. Enim quasi iste sunt est.
Maxime et qui omnis voluptatum eum necessitatibus. Est magnam quam in enim non. Iure dicta commodi nisi accusantium repudiandae sed assumenda. Sed ea et repellendus omnis doloremque quidem. Sed ut et quidem eos iusto. Est sequi et quia laboriosam laudantium placeat accusamus soluta.
Sit alias quis voluptate voluptas. Qui rerum laboriosam aut non. Ut qui voluptas culpa aliquam. Voluptatem amet dolores ut possimus et. Qui atque ratione saepe. Nam iusto aliquam voluptas dolor optio quam minima.
Consequuntur sed nesciunt consequatur quidem. Vel asperiores recusandae molestiae sed. Ut eligendi vel inventore eius. Incidunt expedita cum vero dolorem perferendis rerum aliquid.
Animi et et quasi nam impedit. Aut fugiat consequatur impedit consequuntur sint. Veritatis qui molestiae culpa vel dicta et rem porro. Veritatis enim expedita eos sit corrupti aut iusto. Commodi provident qui mollitia sint nobis sed rerum. Ut unde earum ullam sit.