Historical Report Quick links

20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011

CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2011

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2009, 2010, 2011.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Navigant Consulting
08
96.2%
A.T. Kearney
01
92.3%
Deloitte
02
88.5%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
02
84.6%
McKinsey and Co
01
80.8%
Booz Allen Hamilton
No
76.9%
Bain & Company
01
73.1%
Capgemini
New
69.2%
Prudential
03
65.4%
PwC
03
61.5%
Accenture
06
57.7%
Oliver Wyman
02
53.8%
IBM
03
50.0%
Jones Lang LaSalle
New
46.2%
LEK Consulting
02
42.3%
ZS Associates
New
38.5%
Strategy&
New
34.6%
Mercer
New
30.8%
Alvarez & Marsal
02
26.9%
Charles River Associates
New
23.1%
Infosys
New
19.2%
IMS Consulting Group
07
15.4%
Huron Consulting Group
New
11.5%
FTI Consulting
New
7.7%
NERA Economic Consulting
07
3.8%
Capco
New
0.0%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
ZS Associates (38.7%)
New
96.2%
Bain & Company (23.2%)
14
92.3%
Mercer (22.0%)
02
88.5%
Analysis Group (18.3%)
New
84.6%
IBM (16.1%)
03
80.8%
Towers Watson (15.7%)
New
76.9%
Deloitte (14.0%)
02
73.1%
LEK Consulting (13.7%)
05
69.2%
Jones Lang LaSalle (13.7%)
07
65.4%
A.T. Kearney (9.2%)
05
61.5%
PwC (8.9%)
05
57.7%
Booz Allen Hamilton (7.8%)
05
53.8%
McKinsey and Co (4.2%)
04
50.0%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (3.5%)
04
46.2%
Accenture (2.2%)
03
42.3%
Cornerstone Research (2.0%)
New
38.5%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2.0%)
03
34.6%
Mizuho (2.0%)
New
30.8%
Capco (2.0%)
New
26.9%
Navigant Consulting (1.6%)
07
23.1%
Alvarez & Marsal (1.4%)
06
19.2%
FTI Consulting (1.2%)
New
15.4%
Capgemini (1.2%)
New
11.5%
Strategy& (1.2%)
New
7.7%
Prudential (0.9%)
New
3.8%
Oliver Wyman (0.6%)
22
0.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
NERA Economic Consulting (62.5%)
No
96.2%
FTI Consulting (23.6%)
New
92.3%
Jones Lang LaSalle (23.6%)
New
88.5%
IBM (22.3%)
02
84.6%
Deloitte (21.5%)
01
80.8%
Booz Allen Hamilton (19.3%)
08
76.9%
Alvarez & Marsal (18.7%)
04
73.1%
Strategy& (16.1%)
New
69.2%
Prudential (14.0%)
02
65.4%
Bain & Company (13.3%)
07
61.5%
PwC (7.1%)
06
57.7%
Accenture (5.7%)
06
53.8%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (4.5%)
05
50.0%
Cornerstone Research (2.5%)
New
46.2%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2.5%)
02
42.3%
Infosys (2.5%)
New
38.5%
Charles River Associates (2.5%)
New
34.6%
McKinsey and Co (2.4%)
11
30.8%
Navigant Consulting (2.1%)
03
26.9%
Capco (2.1%)
New
23.1%
Capgemini (1.8%)
New
19.2%
ZS Associates (1.5%)
New
15.4%
LEK Consulting (1.5%)
11
11.5%
Mercer (1.5%)
15
7.7%
A.T. Kearney (1.2%)
10
3.8%
Oliver Wyman (1.0%)
18
0.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Booz Allen Hamilton (9.1%)
10
96.2%
Accenture (2.7%)
14
92.3%
PwC (1.7%)
14
88.5%
Cornerstone Research (0.1%)
New
84.6%
NERA Economic Consulting (0.1%)
03
80.8%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (0.1%)
03
76.9%
Infosys (0.1%)
New
73.1%
Charles River Associates (0.1%)
New
69.2%
Navigant Consulting (0.1%)
04
65.4%
Alvarez & Marsal (0.1%)
06
61.5%
Capco (0.1%)
New
57.7%
Capgemini (0.1%)
New
53.8%
Strategy& (0.1%)
New
50.0%
ZS Associates (0.1%)
New
46.2%
LEK Consulting (0.1%)
08
42.3%
Mercer (0.1%)
13
38.5%
Prudential (0.1%)
11
34.6%
FTI Consulting (0.1%)
New
30.8%
Jones Lang LaSalle (0.1%)
New
26.9%
A.T. Kearney (0.1%)
08
23.1%
Oliver Wyman (0.0%)
19
19.2%
IBM (0.0%)
12
15.4%
Bain & Company (0.0%)
09
11.5%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (0.0%)
09
7.7%
McKinsey and Co (0.0%)
24
3.8%
Deloitte (0.0%)
08
0.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Historical Report Quick links

20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014201320122011

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.

Free Management Consulting Career Resources

Why Consulting
Consulting Case Interview Questions
Management Consulting Salary
Consulting Resume Template
Operations Consulting