CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2019
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2017, 2018, 2019.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Simon Kucher Partners
No
98.8%
Parthenon Group-EY
No
97.6%
Bain & Company
03
96.5%
PwC
03
95.3%
Navigant Consulting
10
94.1%
Boston Consulting Group
03
92.9%
Accenture
01
91.8%
Gartner group
03
90.6%
LEK Consulting
07
89.4%
McKinsey and Co
05
88.2%
Capgemini
21
87.1%
ZS Associates
02
85.9%
Charles River Associates
09
84.7%
Deloitte
01
83.5%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
05
82.4%
Booz Allen Hamilton
09
81.2%
Capco
13
80.0%
Strategy&
02
78.8%
Berkeley Research Group
05
77.6%
Putnam Associates
08
76.5%
Altman Vilandrie & Company
07
75.3%
Mercer
13
74.1%
Protiviti
No
72.9%
Oliver Wyman
03
71.8%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants
05
70.6%
Cornerstone Research
07
69.4%
Analysis Group
13
68.2%
Willis Towers Watson
14
67.1%
Huron Consulting Group
05
65.9%
EisnerAmper LLP
01
64.7%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Cartesian (69.3%)
New
98.9%
Kaiser Associates (68.5%)
No
97.8%
public Resource Management Group (63.2%)
02
96.7%
Altman Vilandrie & Company (38.9%)
01
95.6%
Slalom (36.0%)
New
94.5%
Stax (36.0%)
New
93.4%
KPMG (36.0%)
New
92.3%
Willis Towers Watson (36.0%)
02
91.2%
Capco (35.4%)
03
90.1%
Korn Ferry (35.1%)
New
89.0%
NERA Economic Consulting (32.7%)
03
87.9%
The Brattle Group (31.6%)
09
86.8%
Analysis Group (31.1%)
06
85.7%
Willamette Management Associates (30.9%)
New
84.6%
A.T. Kearney (30.7%)
06
83.5%
Gartner group (29.7%)
03
82.4%
LEK Consulting (29.0%)
06
81.3%
Charles River Associates (28.6%)
17
80.2%
Cornerstone Research (28.6%)
14
79.1%
ECG Management Consultants (27.0%)
New
78.0%
West Monroe Partners (24.5%)
02
76.9%
CohnReznick LLP (24.0%)
10
75.8%
Protiviti (23.5%)
05
74.7%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (23.2%)
New
73.6%
IMS Consulting Group (19.8%)
05
72.5%
Bain & Company (19.5%)
04
71.4%
Health Advances LLC (19.3%)
12
70.3%
McKinsey and Co (19.2%)
05
69.2%
FTI Consulting (19.0%)
02
68.1%
Huron Consulting Group (18.1%)
04
67.0%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Liberty Advisor Group (76.5%)
No
98.9%
MFR Consultants Inc (62.5%)
No
97.8%
Gartner group (58.0%)
01
96.7%
UnitedHealth Group (51.5%)
01
95.6%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (42.5%)
New
94.5%
First Derivatives (35.4%)
01
93.4%
PA Consulting Group (31.7%)
No
92.3%
Marshall and Stevens (26.5%)
No
91.2%
Capco (25.3%)
No
90.1%
West Monroe Partners (24.3%)
60
89.0%
CohnReznick LLP (23.6%)
55
87.9%
EisnerAmper LLP (21.2%)
02
86.8%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (20.5%)
07
85.7%
Meketa Investment Group (18.7%)
02
84.6%
Teneo (18.7%)
No
83.5%
Slalom (18.7%)
New
82.4%
Capgemini (18.0%)
01
81.3%
Alvarez & Marsal (17.5%)
06
80.2%
FTI Consulting (16.6%)
06
79.1%
Crowe Horwath (16.3%)
53
78.0%
Chatham Financial (16.0%)
New
76.9%
Bates White Economic Consulting (16.0%)
01
75.8%
BVA Group (16.0%)
New
74.7%
Parthenon Group-EY (14.4%)
02
73.6%
Compass Lexecon (14.0%)
09
72.5%
Willis Towers Watson (13.3%)
05
71.4%
Charles River Associates (12.9%)
09
70.3%
PwC (12.6%)
03
69.2%
FactSet Research Systems (12.5%)
10
68.1%
The Hackett Group (12.5%)
37
67.0%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Phillip Townsend Associates Inc (60.6%)
No
98.9%
OCC Strategy Consultants (33.8%)
No
97.8%
Renaissance Strategic Advisors (20.3%)
No
96.7%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (12.2%)
02
95.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton (9.8%)
03
94.5%
Arthur D. Little (8.6%)
02
93.4%
Alvarez & Marsal (5.4%)
69
92.3%
Capco (5.1%)
03
91.2%
Simon Kucher Partners (4.9%)
02
90.1%
Accenture (4.9%)
No
89.0%
Cornerstone Research (4.4%)
64
87.9%
PwC (3.4%)
04
86.8%
Willis Towers Watson (3.3%)
02
85.7%
Charles River Associates (3.2%)
05
84.6%
A.T. Kearney (2.9%)
03
83.5%
McKinsey and Co (2.6%)
02
82.4%
FTI Consulting (2.4%)
02
81.3%
Mercer (2.0%)
01
80.2%
Deloitte (1.7%)
01
79.1%
Oliver Wyman (1.6%)
01
78.0%
Strategy& (1.4%)
01
76.9%
Boston Consulting Group (1.3%)
01
75.8%
IBM (1.2%)
57
74.7%
Bain & Company (0.8%)
57
73.6%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (0.6%)
New
72.5%
Kaufman Hall and Associates (0.6%)
01
71.4%
HealthScape Advisors (0.6%)
New
70.3%
Wavestone (0.6%)
New
69.2%
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause (0.6%)
New
68.1%
public Resource Management Group (0.6%)
04
67.0%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?