CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2016

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2014, 2015, 2016.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
A.T. Kearney
02
98.6%
PricewaterhouseCoopers
06
97.1%
McKinsey and Co
01
95.7%
Accenture
08
94.2%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
02
92.8%
Mercer
05
91.3%
Capco
15
89.9%
FTI Consulting
18
88.4%
Bain & Company
04
87.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton
No
85.5%
Deloitte
No
84.1%
The Parthenon Group
05
82.6%
IBM
05
81.2%
Compass Lexecon
18
79.7%
PwC
13
78.3%
Prudential
10
76.8%
Advisory Board Company
21
75.4%
Simon Kucher Partners
02
73.9%
Alvarez & Marsal
10
72.5%
LEK Consulting
04
71.0%
Marshall and Stevens
18
69.6%
BDO Consulting
22
68.1%
Cliffwater LLC
New
66.7%
Campbell Alliance
16
65.2%
Triage Consulting Group
11
63.8%
Cornerstone Research
01
62.3%
ZS Associates
21
60.9%
AlixPartners
05
59.4%
Willis Towers Watson
New
58.0%
Protiviti
19
56.5%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Marshall and Stevens (63.6%)
No
98.6%
Campbell Alliance (53.0%)
No
97.1%
Advisory Board Company (45.4%)
No
95.7%
Cliffwater LLC (43.6%)
New
94.3%
Stax (36.3%)
New
92.9%
Prudential (36.3%)
06
91.4%
Navigant Consulting (35.9%)
08
90.0%
Analysis Group (34.2%)
08
88.6%
Cornerstone Research (32.6%)
03
87.1%
Simon Kucher Partners (32.4%)
14
85.7%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (27.2%)
No
84.3%
IBM (24.9%)
04
82.9%
Protiviti (24.5%)
06
81.4%
Marakon (23.6%)
New
80.0%
OCC Strategy Consultants (23.6%)
17
78.6%
A.T. Kearney (22.7%)
04
77.1%
NERA Economic Consulting (22.7%)
08
75.7%
The Parthenon Group (22.7%)
03
74.3%
ZS Associates (22.4%)
09
72.9%
Berkeley Research Group (21.8%)
11
71.4%
AlixPartners (21.8%)
05
70.0%
Capco (21.6%)
09
68.6%
Huron Consulting Group (21.3%)
05
67.1%
Deloitte (20.4%)
02
65.7%
Ericsson (19.7%)
08
64.3%
PwC (18.6%)
01
62.9%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (18.2%)
23
61.4%
Keystone Strategy (16.8%)
05
60.0%
Charles River Associates (16.8%)
05
58.6%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (15.9%)
10
57.1%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Falconi (41.9%)
06
98.6%
Riveron (29.9%)
03
97.1%
Advisory Board Company (29.9%)
03
95.7%
The Parthenon Group (29.2%)
06
94.3%
Protiviti (23.8%)
11
92.9%
Milliman Inc (21.9%)
36
91.4%
BDO Consulting (18.2%)
03
90.0%
McGladrey LLP (18.2%)
04
88.6%
Bain & Company (17.7%)
11
87.1%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (17.4%)
61
85.7%
Capco (17.1%)
07
84.3%
Strategy& (16.9%)
09
82.9%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (16.3%)
06
81.4%
Compass Lexecon (16.1%)
No
80.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton (16.0%)
06
78.6%
Mercer (15.7%)
09
77.1%
Willis Towers Watson (15.6%)
37
75.7%
Huron Consulting Group (14.1%)
01
74.3%
Parthenon Group-EY (13.7%)
17
72.9%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (13.7%)
12
71.4%
Infosys (13.7%)
06
70.0%
FTI Consulting (13.4%)
14
68.6%
Alvarez & Marsal (12.4%)
10
67.1%
Sapient Global Markets (10.9%)
01
65.7%
PwC (10.1%)
07
64.3%
ZS Associates (10.0%)
02
62.9%
LEK Consulting (9.5%)
13
61.4%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (8.4%)
13
60.0%
Accenture (7.7%)
09
58.6%
McKinsey and Co (7.5%)
No
57.1%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Capgemini (6.5%)
07
98.6%
Simon Kucher Partners (6.3%)
56
97.1%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (5.4%)
04
95.7%
Capco (4.2%)
67
94.3%
Deloitte (3.9%)
01
92.9%
IBM (3.6%)
04
91.4%
Booz Allen Hamilton (3.5%)
03
90.0%
Accenture (2.4%)
06
88.6%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (2.0%)
No
87.1%
McKinsey and Co (1.1%)
05
85.7%
Bain & Company (0.7%)
04
84.3%
PwC (0.5%)
01
82.9%
Milliman Inc (0.1%)
04
81.4%
Marakon (0.1%)
New
80.0%
Carlisle and Gallagher Consulting Group (0.1%)
04
78.6%
Novumed LLC (0.1%)
07
77.1%
OCC Strategy Consultants (0.1%)
26
75.7%
Mu Sigma (0.1%)
18
74.3%
Falconi (0.1%)
18
72.9%
Marshall and Stevens (0.1%)
04
71.4%
ICF International (0.1%)
New
70.0%
Wilshire Associates (0.1%)
03
68.6%
PA Consulting Group (0.1%)
New
67.1%
CohnReznick LLP (0.1%)
New
65.7%
Cliffwater LLC (0.1%)
New
64.3%
Captech Consulting (0.1%)
New
62.9%
Ericsson (0.1%)
03
61.4%
IHS (0.1%)
12
60.0%
BDO Consulting (0.1%)
27
58.6%
HealthScape Advisors (0.1%)
10
57.1%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.