CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2018
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2016, 2017, 2018.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
PricewaterhouseCoopers
03
98.7%
Simon Kucher Partners
09
97.4%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
01
96.1%
Capco
03
94.7%
McKinsey and Co
01
93.4%
Bain & Company
03
92.1%
Accenture
No
90.8%
Parthenon Group-EY
04
89.5%
PwC
05
88.2%
Mercer
02
86.8%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
04
85.5%
Gartner group
New
84.2%
Putnam Associates
32
82.9%
ZS Associates
05
81.6%
Deloitte
05
80.3%
Navigant Consulting
22
78.9%
LEK Consulting
01
77.6%
FTI Consulting
02
76.3%
Mars & Co
11
75.0%
Cornerstone Research
No
73.7%
Charles River Associates
06
72.4%
Strategy&
09
71.1%
Oliver Wyman
05
69.7%
Protiviti
15
68.4%
Berkeley Research Group
04
67.1%
Booz Allen Hamilton
04
65.8%
A.T. Kearney
22
64.5%
IBM
11
63.2%
Altman Vilandrie & Company
08
61.8%
EisnerAmper LLP
New
60.5%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
public Resource Management Group (62.9%)
01
98.8%
Kaiser Associates (59.2%)
New
97.7%
Altman Vilandrie & Company (45.7%)
01
96.5%
Cliffwater LLC (42.9%)
01
95.3%
Cornerstone Research (34.7%)
03
94.2%
Capco (32.8%)
08
93.0%
Analysis Group (32.7%)
02
91.9%
NERA Economic Consulting (32.1%)
02
90.7%
A.T. Kearney (31.5%)
03
89.5%
Willis Towers Watson (31.1%)
19
88.4%
Deloitte (30.6%)
New
87.2%
LEK Consulting (29.2%)
04
86.0%
CohnReznick LLP (26.8%)
02
84.9%
Parthenon Group-EY (24.0%)
06
83.7%
Gartner group (23.8%)
New
82.6%
Navigant Consulting (23.6%)
03
81.4%
Health Advances LLC (22.9%)
New
80.2%
Manhattan Associates (22.9%)
01
79.1%
Riveron (21.4%)
27
77.9%
West Monroe Partners (21.4%)
New
76.7%
Protiviti (21.4%)
16
75.6%
IMS Consulting Group (19.6%)
08
74.4%
The Brattle Group (19.1%)
No
73.3%
Ernst & Young (19.1%)
07
72.1%
Bain & Company (19.0%)
03
70.9%
McKinsey and Co (17.7%)
16
69.8%
Berkeley Research Group (17.5%)
38
68.6%
Huron Consulting Group (16.1%)
07
67.4%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (16.0%)
11
66.3%
AlixPartners (15.9%)
34
65.1%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Liberty Advisor Group (68.8%)
New
98.8%
MFR Consultants Inc (68.8%)
New
97.7%
UnitedHealth Group (51.6%)
New
96.5%
Gartner group (45.9%)
New
95.3%
First Derivatives (42.6%)
New
94.2%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (39.6%)
03
93.0%
PA Consulting Group (37.5%)
47
91.9%
Marshall and Stevens (35.5%)
28
90.7%
Capco (26.8%)
05
89.5%
Meketa Investment Group (22.6%)
New
88.4%
Milliman Inc (22.6%)
05
87.2%
The Parthenon Group (22.6%)
10
86.0%
Trinity Partners (22.6%)
New
84.9%
FTI Consulting (21.4%)
09
83.7%
EisnerAmper LLP (21.3%)
New
82.6%
Teneo (18.8%)
08
81.4%
Compass Lexecon (18.8%)
36
80.2%
Ernst & Young (18.8%)
16
79.1%
ICF International (16.1%)
28
77.9%
Capgemini (14.2%)
No
76.7%
FactSet Research Systems (14.2%)
39
75.6%
ZS Associates (14.1%)
03
74.4%
Willis Towers Watson (13.6%)
No
73.3%
NERA Economic Consulting (13.3%)
38
72.1%
Bates White Economic Consulting (12.5%)
19
70.9%
Alvarez & Marsal (12.5%)
14
69.8%
PwC (12.5%)
10
68.6%
Navigant Consulting (12.0%)
37
67.4%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (11.8%)
01
66.3%
Parthenon Group-EY (11.3%)
17
65.1%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Phillip Townsend Associates Inc (60.7%)
No
98.8%
OCC Strategy Consultants (40.7%)
No
97.7%
Renaissance Strategic Advisors (33.9%)
New
96.5%
Arthur D. Little (9.4%)
New
95.3%
Capco (8.9%)
02
94.2%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (8.5%)
46
93.0%
Simon Kucher Partners (8.0%)
04
91.9%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (7.3%)
06
90.7%
Booz Allen Hamilton (7.3%)
05
89.5%
Accenture (5.7%)
No
88.4%
Willis Towers Watson (4.5%)
06
87.2%
A.T. Kearney (4.2%)
06
86.0%
Capgemini (3.6%)
04
84.9%
McKinsey and Co (3.2%)
01
83.7%
FTI Consulting (3.1%)
07
82.6%
Deloitte (2.7%)
04
81.4%
Mercer (2.7%)
06
80.2%
PwC (2.1%)
50
79.1%
Oliver Wyman (1.8%)
47
77.9%
Strategy& (1.1%)
43
76.7%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (0.9%)
06
75.6%
Meketa Investment Group (0.7%)
New
74.4%
McGladrey LLP (0.7%)
16
73.3%
First Derivatives (0.7%)
New
72.1%
Milliman Inc (0.7%)
07
70.9%
Kaufman Hall and Associates (0.7%)
New
69.8%
The Parthenon Group (0.7%)
09
68.6%
Mu Sigma (0.7%)
08
67.4%
MasterCard Advisors (0.7%)
New
66.3%
Trinity Partners (0.7%)
New
65.1%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?