CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2020
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2018, 2019, 2020.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
PricewaterhouseCoopers
01
98.9%
Parthenon Group-EY
01
97.7%
Simon Kucher Partners
02
96.6%
Korn Ferry
34
95.4%
Accenture
02
94.3%
Bain & Company
02
93.1%
Mercer
16
92.0%
Putnam Associates
13
90.8%
Navigant Consulting
04
89.7%
Boston Consulting Group
04
88.5%
Capgemini
01
87.4%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
04
86.2%
PwC
05
85.1%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC
New
83.9%
Charles River Associates
No
82.8%
McKinsey and Co
05
81.6%
LEK Consulting
07
80.5%
ZS Associates
05
79.3%
Gartner group
10
78.2%
Strategy&
01
77.0%
Deloitte
07
75.9%
Berkeley Research Group
02
74.7%
Altman Vilandrie & Company
01
73.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton
07
72.4%
Oliver Wyman
No
71.3%
Capco
08
70.1%
Mars & Co
15
69.0%
Protiviti
04
67.8%
Cornerstone Research
02
66.7%
FTI Consulting
09
65.5%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
The Advisory Board Company (69.3%)
New
99.0%
Cartesian (52.0%)
01
98.1%
Kaiser Associates (51.0%)
01
97.1%
Slalom (43.2%)
03
96.1%
Infosys (43.2%)
New
95.1%
KPMG (41.6%)
02
94.2%
Willis Towers Watson (41.3%)
01
93.2%
Capco (37.6%)
01
92.2%
Analysis Group (36.7%)
04
91.3%
Stax (36.0%)
02
90.3%
Guidehouse (35.1%)
New
89.3%
Charles River Associates (32.8%)
07
88.3%
Altman Vilandrie & Company (32.4%)
08
87.4%
Korn Ferry (31.6%)
04
86.4%
NERA Economic Consulting (30.8%)
04
85.4%
A.T. Kearney (27.9%)
No
84.5%
ECG Management Consultants (27.0%)
04
83.5%
PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (27.0%)
03
82.5%
Gartner group (26.0%)
02
81.6%
West Monroe Partners (25.8%)
02
80.6%
The Brattle Group (24.0%)
09
79.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton (23.7%)
15
78.6%
IMS Consulting Group (23.2%)
03
77.7%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (23.2%)
01
76.7%
Health Advances LLC (23.2%)
03
75.7%
Wood Mackenzie (22.6%)
23
74.8%
McKinsey and Co (22.3%)
02
73.8%
Protiviti (21.5%)
04
72.8%
LEK Consulting (21.4%)
11
71.8%
Huron Consulting Group (21.2%)
02
70.9%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Liberty Advisor Group (81.4%)
No
99.0%
ICF International (62.9%)
New
98.1%
MFR Consultants Inc (62.9%)
01
97.1%
FGMK, LLC (62.9%)
New
96.1%
UnitedHealth Group (57.2%)
01
95.1%
First Derivatives (52.4%)
No
94.2%
Gartner group (50.9%)
04
93.2%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (42.9%)
03
92.2%
CohnReznick LLP (42.9%)
02
91.3%
PA Consulting Group (41.4%)
03
90.3%
Marshall and Stevens (26.8%)
03
89.3%
Bates White Economic Consulting (26.8%)
12
88.3%
EisnerAmper LLP (21.4%)
01
87.4%
West Monroe Partners (20.7%)
04
86.4%
Alvarez & Marsal (20.4%)
05
85.4%
Simon Kucher Partners (19.2%)
37
84.5%
The Hackett Group (19.1%)
16
83.5%
The Parthenon Group (19.1%)
06
82.5%
Capco (18.9%)
10
81.6%
FactSet Research Systems (17.9%)
14
80.6%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (16.9%)
14
79.6%
BVA Group (16.3%)
03
78.6%
Trinity Partners (16.3%)
New
77.7%
Chatham Financial (16.3%)
01
76.7%
Capgemini (15.9%)
06
75.7%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (15.9%)
11
74.8%
Willis Towers Watson (15.3%)
03
73.8%
Boston Consulting Group (15.1%)
12
72.8%
Navigant Consulting (15.0%)
07
71.8%
Compass Lexecon (14.3%)
03
70.9%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Renaissance Strategic Advisors (20.1%)
02
99.0%
Riveron Consulting (12.7%)
49
98.1%
Gartner group (12.6%)
76
97.1%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (12.2%)
No
96.1%
Arthur D. Little (7.8%)
01
95.1%
Accenture (6.0%)
04
94.2%
Cornerstone Research (5.2%)
05
93.2%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (5.1%)
03
92.2%
Capco (4.7%)
01
91.3%
Alvarez & Marsal (4.5%)
03
90.3%
Booz Allen Hamilton (4.3%)
06
89.3%
PwC (3.7%)
02
88.3%
Charles River Associates (3.0%)
02
87.4%
McKinsey and Co (3.0%)
03
86.4%
IBM (2.5%)
09
85.4%
Strategy& (2.2%)
06
84.5%
Oliver Wyman (1.8%)
04
83.5%
A.T. Kearney (1.6%)
02
82.5%
Deloitte (1.5%)
01
81.6%
ZS Associates (1.3%)
77
80.6%
Bain & Company (0.8%)
04
79.6%
Boston Consulting Group (0.6%)
01
78.6%
IMS Consulting Group (0.3%)
57
77.7%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (0.3%)
02
76.7%
Kaufman Hall and Associates (0.3%)
02
75.7%
Mu Sigma (0.3%)
18
74.8%
Operis (0.3%)
New
73.8%
Slalom (0.3%)
17
72.8%
CohnReznick LLP (0.3%)
37
71.8%
Infosys (0.3%)
New
70.9%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?