CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2023

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2021, 2022, 2023.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
PricewaterhouseCoopers
04
98.6%
A.T. Kearney
No
97.1%
LEK Consulting
No
95.7%
Boston Consulting Group
03
94.2%
Deloitte
01
92.8%
Protiviti
05
91.3%
Oliver Wyman
03
89.9%
McKinsey and Co
02
88.4%
Guidehouse
02
87.0%
PwC
01
85.5%
AlixPartners
16
84.1%
Willis Towers Watson
01
82.6%
Strategy&
05
81.2%
Bain & Company
02
79.7%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal
18
78.3%
Accenture
02
76.8%
Alvarez & Marsal
02
75.4%
West Monroe Partners
03
73.9%
Ankura
32
72.5%
ZS Associates
01
71.0%
Deloitte
07
69.6%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants
28
68.1%
Teneo
22
66.7%
FTI Consulting
06
65.2%
Mercer
No
63.8%
Parthenon Group-EY
03
62.3%
Charles River Associates
07
60.9%
OC&C Strategy Consultants
07
59.4%
McKinsey
03
58.0%
Arthur D. Little
02
56.5%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Clarkston Consulting (69.5%)
No
98.7%
Frost and Sullivan (63.4%)
No
97.5%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (43.4%)
No
96.2%
NERA Economic Consulting (40.6%)
No
94.9%
Tyton Partners (36.1%)
03
93.7%
Bates White Economic Consulting (36.1%)
03
92.4%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (31.7%)
13
91.1%
Accordion Partners (31.7%)
53
89.9%
Wood Mackenzie (31.0%)
02
88.6%
Arthur D. Little (27.1%)
04
87.3%
Slalom (26.4%)
05
86.1%
Willis Towers Watson (26.1%)
No
84.8%
Charles River Associates (25.5%)
08
83.5%
West Monroe Partners (24.2%)
10
82.3%
The Brattle Group (24.1%)
04
81.0%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (24.1%)
02
79.7%
Analysis Group (23.5%)
07
78.5%
Stax Inc (23.4%)
20
77.2%
Gartner group (21.7%)
02
75.9%
Meketa Investment Group (21.7%)
07
74.7%
Guidehouse (20.7%)
08
73.4%
Parthenon Group-EY (20.0%)
01
72.2%
IBM (19.7%)
03
70.9%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (19.7%)
28
69.6%
Capco (19.7%)
14
68.4%
MasterCard Advisors (19.5%)
13
67.1%
FTI Consulting (18.8%)
06
65.8%
PwC (18.7%)
05
64.6%
Strategy& (18.0%)
01
63.3%
Booz Allen Hamilton (17.8%)
11
62.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
First Derivatives (68.2%)
No
98.7%
Mars & Co (41.9%)
11
97.5%
Huron Consulting Group (37.3%)
08
96.2%
Putnam Associates (31.5%)
16
94.9%
BDO Consulting (27.3%)
03
93.7%
PA Consulting Group (26.2%)
57
92.4%
Guidehouse (24.4%)
02
91.1%
Mercer (23.3%)
11
89.9%
A.T. Kearney (21.0%)
03
88.6%
Altman Solon (20.9%)
06
87.3%
Infosys (19.0%)
01
86.1%
Teneo (18.2%)
04
84.8%
Simon Kucher Partners (15.7%)
08
83.5%
KPMG (15.0%)
No
82.3%
Accenture (14.2%)
No
81.0%
ZS Associates (13.4%)
12
79.7%
PwC (13.0%)
09
78.5%
AlixPartners (12.4%)
13
77.2%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (12.3%)
65
75.9%
Protiviti (11.6%)
59
74.7%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (10.9%)
06
73.4%
McKinsey and Co (10.9%)
02
72.2%
FTI Consulting (10.6%)
01
70.9%
Parthenon Group-EY (10.0%)
01
69.6%
Deloitte (9.8%)
10
68.4%
West Monroe Partners (9.7%)
14
67.1%
Berkeley Research Group (9.1%)
15
65.8%
LEK Consulting (8.3%)
08
64.6%
Boston Consulting Group (7.9%)
12
63.3%
Bain & Company (7.9%)
03
62.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
The Brattle Group (22.4%)
No
98.7%
Willis Towers Watson (12.6%)
03
97.5%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (11.3%)
01
96.2%
Altman Solon (10.1%)
34
94.9%
Guidehouse (8.1%)
02
93.7%
Capgemini (7.8%)
17
92.4%
Simon Kucher Partners (7.7%)
63
91.1%
Accenture (6.1%)
02
89.9%
Strategy& (4.1%)
01
88.6%
Bain & Company (2.2%)
05
87.3%
McKinsey and Co (2.0%)
02
86.1%
Deloitte (1.7%)
No
84.8%
Boston Consulting Group (1.5%)
No
83.5%
FTI Consulting (1.2%)
No
82.3%
PwC (0.7%)
01
81.0%
BVA Group (0.3%)
02
79.7%
Riveron Consulting (0.3%)
14
78.5%
Frost and Sullivan (0.3%)
04
77.2%
Stax Inc (0.3%)
22
75.9%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (0.3%)
04
74.7%
Keystone Strategy (0.3%)
04
73.4%
CBIZ (0.3%)
06
72.2%
Mars & Co (0.3%)
21
70.9%
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause (0.3%)
New
69.6%
CIL Management Consultants (0.3%)
01
68.4%
FactSet Research Systems (0.3%)
06
67.1%
MNP LLP (0.2%)
03
65.8%
Clarkston Consulting (0.2%)
03
64.6%
Tyton Partners (0.2%)
04
63.3%
Insight Sourcing Group (0.2%)
New
62.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.