CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2021

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2019, 2020, 2021.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Willis Towers Watson
29
98.7%
LEK Consulting
14
97.4%
Boston Consulting Group
07
96.1%
Parthenon Group-EY
03
94.7%
Korn Ferry
02
93.4%
PwC
02
92.1%
Strategy&
12
90.8%
Charles River Associates
06
89.5%
Protiviti
18
88.2%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
02
86.8%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC
02
85.5%
Accenture
07
84.2%
IBM
19
82.9%
Guidehouse
26
81.6%
Bain & Company
09
80.3%
Oliver Wyman
08
78.9%
Deloitte
03
77.6%
ZS Associates
01
76.3%
McKinsey and Co
04
75.0%
FTI Consulting
09
73.7%
Berkeley Research Group
No
72.4%
A.T. Kearney
19
71.1%
Mercer
16
69.7%
Huron Consulting Group
07
68.4%
Capco
No
67.1%
Alvarez & Marsal
10
65.8%
Booz Allen Hamilton
04
64.5%
McKinsey
18
63.2%
Capgemini
18
61.8%
Analysis Group
04
60.5%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Clarkston Consulting (77.2%)
New
98.9%
Frost and Sullivan (63.6%)
New
97.8%
Cartesian (52.2%)
02
96.7%
Wood Mackenzie (39.8%)
19
95.6%
NERA Economic Consulting (38.9%)
08
94.5%
Analysis Group (38.5%)
01
93.4%
Korn Ferry (38.0%)
05
92.3%
Kaiser Associates (38.0%)
06
91.2%
Charles River Associates (37.7%)
01
90.1%
Willis Towers Watson (36.3%)
05
89.0%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (36.3%)
New
87.9%
Tyton Partners (36.3%)
New
86.8%
Bates White Economic Consulting (36.3%)
71
85.7%
Slalom (31.8%)
11
84.6%
Capco (31.5%)
09
83.5%
KPMG (31.1%)
08
82.4%
Gartner group (28.8%)
No
81.3%
Guidehouse (27.3%)
09
80.2%
ECG Management Consultants (27.2%)
03
79.1%
Crowe Horwath (27.2%)
29
78.0%
Protiviti (24.7%)
04
76.9%
Stax (24.2%)
08
75.8%
West Monroe Partners (23.9%)
05
74.7%
Infosys (21.8%)
20
73.6%
Huron Consulting Group (21.2%)
02
72.5%
Putnam Associates (21.2%)
25
71.4%
A.T. Kearney (20.3%)
12
70.3%
McKinsey (19.9%)
06
69.2%
Willamette Management Associates (19.8%)
01
68.1%
The Brattle Group (19.8%)
11
67.0%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Liberty Advisor Group (68.5%)
No
98.9%
First Derivatives (51.8%)
04
97.8%
CohnReznick LLP (42.2%)
06
96.7%
Sapient Global Markets (35.2%)
New
95.6%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (35.2%)
New
94.5%
Altman Solon (35.2%)
New
93.4%
Crowe Horwath (26.4%)
25
92.3%
Gartner group (22.8%)
01
91.2%
UnitedHealth Group (22.2%)
04
90.1%
Guidehouse (21.6%)
75
89.0%
West Monroe Partners (20.4%)
03
87.9%
Simon Kucher Partners (18.7%)
04
86.8%
Albourne Partners (18.5%)
New
85.7%
Bates White Economic Consulting (18.5%)
02
84.6%
Arthur D. Little (18.5%)
27
83.5%
IBM (17.3%)
28
82.4%
Alvarez & Marsal (16.8%)
02
81.3%
Parthenon Group-EY (16.1%)
13
80.2%
Boston Consulting Group (16.0%)
07
79.1%
Chatham Financial (15.9%)
02
78.0%
Mars & Co (15.9%)
22
76.9%
Accenture (14.7%)
08
75.8%
Charles River Associates (14.6%)
17
74.7%
Teneo (14.1%)
51
73.6%
Capgemini (13.2%)
02
72.5%
McKinsey and Co (12.9%)
07
71.4%
Willis Towers Watson (12.4%)
02
70.3%
PwC (12.1%)
01
69.2%
Capco (12.0%)
11
68.1%
FTI Consulting (11.2%)
04
67.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
The Brattle Group (18.3%)
61
98.9%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (16.9%)
New
97.8%
Gartner group (11.2%)
01
96.7%
Guidehouse (10.6%)
59
95.6%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (9.6%)
02
94.5%
Riveron (6.8%)
01
93.4%
Accenture (6.5%)
02
92.3%
Cornerstone Research (5.9%)
02
91.2%
IBM (5.6%)
05
90.1%
Booz Allen Hamilton (5.2%)
No
89.0%
Alvarez & Marsal (4.5%)
02
87.9%
Strategy& (4.1%)
03
86.8%
McKinsey and Co (2.4%)
No
85.7%
A.T. Kearney (1.8%)
03
84.6%
ZS Associates (1.5%)
04
83.5%
PwC (1.5%)
05
82.4%
Bain & Company (1.2%)
03
81.3%
Boston Consulting Group (0.7%)
03
80.2%
Deloitte (0.7%)
01
79.1%
UnitedHealth Group (0.3%)
40
78.0%
CohnReznick LLP (0.3%)
07
76.9%
Empire Valuation Consultants (0.3%)
09
75.8%
HealthScape Advisors (0.3%)
09
74.7%
MNP LLP (0.3%)
New
73.6%
Operis (0.3%)
01
72.5%
Frost and Sullivan (0.3%)
New
71.4%
Ryan llc (0.3%)
New
70.3%
STEER Partners (0.3%)
21
69.2%
Liberty Advisor Group (0.2%)
37
68.1%
Sapient Global Markets (0.2%)
New
67.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.