CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2022

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2020, 2021, 2022.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
02
98.6%
Oliver Wyman
14
97.1%
A.T. Kearney
21
95.7%
Guidehouse
10
94.2%
LEK Consulting
01
92.8%
PricewaterhouseCoopers
01
91.3%
Strategy&
No
89.9%
Deloitte
01
88.4%
McKinsey and Co
12
87.0%
Protiviti
02
85.5%
PwC
07
84.1%
Willis Towers Watson
11
82.6%
Bain & Company
02
81.2%
Accenture
02
79.7%
West Monroe Partners
17
78.3%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
06
76.8%
FTI Consulting
03
75.4%
Capco
09
73.9%
Alvarez & Marsal
07
72.5%
Parthenon Group-EY
18
71.0%
ZS Associates
02
69.6%
Mercer
01
68.1%
Putnam Associates
25
66.7%
McKinsey
01
65.2%
AlixPartners
08
63.8%
Charles River Associates
09
62.3%
Deloitte
30
60.9%
Berkeley Research Group
06
59.4%
Wood Mackenzie
17
58.0%
Mars & Co
10
56.5%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Clarkston Consulting (69.6%)
No
98.8%
Frost and Sullivan (63.6%)
No
97.6%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (43.6%)
08
96.4%
Wood Mackenzie (41.8%)
No
95.2%
NERA Economic Consulting (39.9%)
03
94.0%
Charles River Associates (39.9%)
08
92.8%
Arthur D. Little (39.7%)
27
91.6%
Tyton Partners (36.3%)
04
90.4%
Bates White Economic Consulting (36.3%)
04
89.2%
Analysis Group (31.6%)
03
88.0%
Capco (30.9%)
05
86.7%
Willis Towers Watson (30.5%)
03
85.5%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (27.2%)
67
84.3%
Protiviti (26.5%)
07
83.1%
Slalom (26.5%)
No
81.9%
Meketa Investment Group (26.5%)
New
80.7%
Gartner group (24.4%)
No
79.5%
Kaiser Associates (24.2%)
12
78.3%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (24.2%)
11
77.1%
The Brattle Group (21.8%)
09
75.9%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (21.2%)
35
74.7%
PwC (21.0%)
03
73.5%
Parthenon Group-EY (20.9%)
29
72.3%
West Monroe Partners (20.5%)
01
71.1%
Guidehouse (19.9%)
07
69.9%
IBM (19.8%)
28
68.7%
Oliver Wyman (19.7%)
10
67.5%
Trinity Partners (19.6%)
05
66.3%
Deloitte (19.6%)
30
65.1%
Strategy& (19.0%)
09
63.9%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
First Derivatives (72.6%)
01
98.8%
CBIZ (34.8%)
New
97.6%
BDO Consulting (26.1%)
New
96.4%
Simon Kucher Partners (22.7%)
08
95.2%
A.T. Kearney (18.2%)
29
94.0%
Albourne Partners (18.1%)
07
92.8%
Bates White Economic Consulting (18.1%)
07
91.6%
Infosys (17.4%)
74
90.4%
Huron Consulting Group (17.4%)
32
89.2%
Guidehouse (15.7%)
No
88.0%
Riveron Consulting (15.5%)
16
86.7%
Mars & Co (15.5%)
09
85.5%
KPMG (14.9%)
24
84.3%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (14.2%)
08
83.1%
Teneo (13.9%)
11
81.9%
Accenture (13.9%)
08
80.7%
Mercer (13.6%)
31
79.5%
Arthur D. Little (13.6%)
03
78.3%
FTI Consulting (13.3%)
13
77.1%
Putnam Associates (13.0%)
70
75.9%
Alvarez & Marsal (12.9%)
04
74.7%
PricewaterhouseCoopers (12.9%)
03
73.5%
Parthenon Group-EY (12.3%)
05
72.3%
McKinsey and Co (12.2%)
05
71.1%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (12.1%)
11
69.9%
PwC (10.9%)
07
68.7%
ZS Associates (10.7%)
25
67.5%
Capco (10.4%)
03
66.3%
AlixPartners (10.4%)
11
65.1%
Strategy& (10.1%)
15
63.9%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
The Brattle Group (20.2%)
No
98.8%
Gartner group (15.5%)
02
97.6%
Riveron Consulting (14.5%)
No
96.4%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (12.7%)
02
95.2%
Willis Towers Watson (11.9%)
72
94.0%
Accenture (8.5%)
01
92.8%
Guidehouse (7.8%)
02
91.6%
Strategy& (5.0%)
04
90.4%
McKinsey and Co (3.0%)
04
89.2%
A.T. Kearney (2.6%)
05
88.0%
ZS Associates (1.8%)
05
86.7%
Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (1.4%)
06
85.5%
FTI Consulting (1.1%)
81
84.3%
Deloitte (0.9%)
13
83.1%
PwC (0.8%)
01
81.9%
Bain & Company (0.4%)
01
80.7%
Empire Valuation Consultants (0.3%)
04
79.5%
Wavestone (0.3%)
40
78.3%
Accordion Partners (0.3%)
26
77.1%
FactSet Research Systems (0.3%)
26
75.9%
Operis (0.3%)
03
74.7%
Frost and Sullivan (0.3%)
03
73.5%
Capgemini (0.3%)
53
72.3%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (0.3%)
07
71.1%
Keystone Strategy (0.3%)
New
69.9%
Crowe Horwath (0.3%)
28
68.7%
CBIZ (0.3%)
New
67.5%
Trinity Partners (0.3%)
05
66.3%
MNP LLP (0.3%)
06
65.1%
Clarkston Consulting (0.3%)
26
63.9%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.