CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2022

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2020, 2021, 2022.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Boston Consulting Group
03
98.6%
A.T. Kearney
20
97.1%
LEK Consulting
01
95.7%
Oliver Wyman
13
94.3%
PwC
01
92.9%
Guidehouse
08
91.4%
Deloitte
09
90.0%
Strategy&
01
88.6%
McKinsey and Co
10
87.1%
Protiviti
01
85.7%
Willis Towers Watson
10
84.3%
Bain & Company
03
82.9%
Accenture
01
81.4%
West Monroe Partners
18
80.0%
ClearView Healthcare Partners
05
78.6%
Capco
09
77.1%
FTI Consulting
03
75.7%
Alvarez & Marsal
08
74.3%
Charles River Associates
11
72.9%
Berkeley Research Group
01
71.4%
ZS Associates
03
70.0%
Parthenon Group-EY
19
68.6%
Putnam Associates
24
67.1%
Mercer
01
65.7%
McKinsey
03
64.3%
AlixPartners
07
62.9%
Deloitte
29
61.4%
Mars & Co
10
60.0%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC
18
58.6%
Kaiser Associates
11
57.1%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Clarkston Consulting (69.6%)
No
98.8%
Frost and Sullivan (63.5%)
No
97.6%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (43.5%)
08
96.4%
NERA Economic Consulting (42.5%)
02
95.2%
Charles River Associates (40.7%)
04
94.0%
Arthur D. Little (39.7%)
27
92.8%
Wood Mackenzie (37.9%)
03
91.6%
Tyton Partners (36.2%)
04
90.4%
Bates White Economic Consulting (36.2%)
04
89.2%
Analysis Group (36.0%)
05
88.0%
Capco (30.9%)
06
86.7%
Willis Towers Watson (30.4%)
02
85.5%
Guidehouse (28.2%)
08
84.3%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (27.2%)
65
83.1%
Protiviti (26.4%)
07
81.9%
Slalom (26.4%)
No
80.7%
Gartner group (24.4%)
01
79.5%
Kaiser Associates (24.2%)
10
78.3%
The Brattle Group (21.7%)
11
77.1%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (21.7%)
19
75.9%
Parthenon Group-EY (21.4%)
27
74.7%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (21.2%)
32
73.5%
West Monroe Partners (20.5%)
No
72.3%
Oliver Wyman (20.2%)
11
71.1%
IBM (19.8%)
27
69.9%
Meketa Investment Group (19.8%)
New
68.7%
Strategy& (19.7%)
13
67.5%
Trinity Partners (19.6%)
04
66.3%
PwC (19.4%)
07
65.1%
Mercer (18.8%)
13
63.9%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
First Derivatives (72.7%)
01
98.8%
BDO Consulting (40.9%)
New
97.6%
CBIZ (34.8%)
New
96.4%
Altman Solon (34.8%)
02
95.2%
Simon Kucher Partners (19.5%)
07
94.0%
A.T. Kearney (18.2%)
25
92.8%
Albourne Partners (18.2%)
06
91.6%
Bates White Economic Consulting (18.2%)
06
90.4%
Guidehouse (17.5%)
01
89.2%
Infosys (17.4%)
70
88.0%
Huron Consulting Group (17.4%)
34
86.7%
Mars & Co (15.6%)
09
85.5%
KPMG (14.9%)
24
84.3%
Accenture (14.7%)
08
83.1%
Teneo (13.9%)
09
81.9%
Boston Consulting Group (13.8%)
03
80.7%
Arthur D. Little (13.6%)
02
79.5%
Mercer (13.1%)
26
78.3%
Putnam Associates (13.1%)
68
77.1%
FTI Consulting (12.9%)
10
75.9%
McKinsey and Co (12.1%)
05
74.7%
Alvarez & Marsal (12.0%)
05
73.5%
Parthenon Group-EY (11.9%)
05
72.3%
PwC (11.5%)
04
71.1%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (10.9%)
10
69.9%
ZS Associates (10.7%)
24
68.7%
Capco (10.4%)
02
67.5%
Ankura (9.9%)
04
66.3%
AlixPartners (9.9%)
07
65.1%
Strategy& (9.9%)
12
63.9%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
The Brattle Group (20.1%)
No
98.8%
Gartner group (15.5%)
01
97.6%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (12.7%)
01
96.4%
Willis Towers Watson (11.8%)
71
95.2%
Accenture (8.4%)
02
94.0%
Riveron (7.2%)
No
92.8%
Guidehouse (6.9%)
03
91.6%
Strategy& (4.9%)
04
90.4%
McKinsey and Co (2.9%)
04
89.2%
A.T. Kearney (2.6%)
04
88.0%
ZS Associates (1.8%)
04
86.7%
Deloitte (1.4%)
07
85.5%
Boston Consulting Group (1.3%)
05
84.3%
FTI Consulting (1.1%)
77
83.1%
Bain & Company (0.8%)
02
81.9%
PwC (0.7%)
No
80.7%
Empire Valuation Consultants (0.3%)
05
79.5%
BVA Group (0.3%)
41
78.3%
Accordion Partners (0.3%)
15
77.1%
FactSet Research Systems (0.3%)
26
75.9%
Operis (0.3%)
04
74.7%
Frost and Sullivan (0.3%)
04
73.5%
Capgemini (0.3%)
50
72.3%
GRAPH Strategy LLC (0.3%)
08
71.1%
Keystone Strategy (0.3%)
New
69.9%
CIL Management Consultants (0.3%)
New
68.7%
Crowe Horwath (0.2%)
26
67.5%
CBIZ (0.2%)
New
66.3%
Trinity Partners (0.2%)
06
65.1%
MNP LLP (0.2%)
06
63.9%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.