CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2024

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2022, 2023, 2024.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Boston Consulting Group
02
98.4%
Deloitte
02
96.7%
McKinsey and Co
04
95.1%
AlixPartners
06
93.4%
Accenture
10
91.8%
A.T. Kearney
05
90.2%
Bain & Company
06
88.5%
Strategy&
04
86.9%
Oliver Wyman
03
85.2%
LEK Consulting
08
83.6%
PwC
03
82.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton
20
80.3%
Protiviti
08
78.7%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants
06
77.0%
Ankura
03
75.4%
Guidehouse
07
73.8%
Capgemini
28
72.1%
Willis Towers Watson
07
70.5%
McKinsey
08
68.9%
Alvarez & Marsal
04
67.2%
Teneo
No
65.6%
FTI Consulting
No
63.9%
OC&C Strategy Consultants
03
62.3%
Mercer
01
60.7%
Compass Lexecon
06
59.0%
Baker Tilly Virchow Krause
New
57.4%
MasterCard Advisors
02
55.7%
Parthenon Group-EY
04
54.1%
Cornerstone Research
17
52.5%
Capco
12
50.8%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
NERA Economic Consulting (42.9%)
03
98.5%
Arthur D. Little (35.9%)
08
97.0%
MasterCard Advisors (35.9%)
22
95.5%
The Brattle Group (35.9%)
11
94.0%
Accordion Partners (35.0%)
03
92.5%
Crowe LLP (34.6%)
58
91.0%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (28.6%)
No
89.6%
Willis Towers Watson (27.7%)
04
88.1%
A&M - Alvarez and Marsal (26.9%)
07
86.6%
Slalom (26.9%)
01
85.1%
A.T. Kearney (26.7%)
25
83.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton (24.7%)
17
82.1%
Capco (21.5%)
11
80.6%
Meketa Investment Group (21.5%)
06
79.1%
West Monroe Partners (21.2%)
01
77.6%
McKinsey and Co (21.1%)
16
76.1%
Guidehouse (21.0%)
04
74.6%
Deloitte (20.5%)
13
73.1%
Parthenon Group-EY (20.3%)
03
71.6%
Analysis Group (19.8%)
02
70.1%
Teneo (19.7%)
18
68.7%
Boston Consulting Group (19.7%)
08
67.2%
Russell Reynolds Associates (19.2%)
New
65.7%
Charles River Associates (18.4%)
11
64.2%
Oliver Wyman (18.1%)
13
62.7%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (17.5%)
15
61.2%
PwC (17.2%)
No
59.7%
Mercer (17.2%)
16
58.2%
Simon Kucher Partners (15.8%)
19
56.7%
AlixPartners (15.8%)
17
55.2%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Huron Consulting Group (56.9%)
02
98.5%
Putnam Associates (51.3%)
02
97.0%
Mars & Co (35.0%)
01
95.5%
Teneo (31.9%)
09
94.0%
Infosys (30.0%)
06
92.5%
PA Consulting Group (30.0%)
No
91.0%
BDO Consulting (27.3%)
02
89.6%
Mercer (23.7%)
No
88.1%
KPMG (18.4%)
03
86.6%
ZS Associates (18.2%)
06
85.1%
PwC (16.7%)
06
83.6%
FTI Consulting (14.4%)
11
82.1%
Guidehouse (14.0%)
06
80.6%
Oliver Wyman (13.6%)
20
79.1%
Accenture (13.1%)
No
77.6%
Protiviti (11.9%)
04
76.1%
Alvarez & Marsal (11.8%)
20
74.6%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (11.7%)
01
73.1%
NERA Economic Consulting (11.1%)
13
71.6%
Altman Solon (11.0%)
10
70.1%
Deloitte (10.7%)
05
68.7%
Simon Kucher Partners (10.5%)
08
67.2%
Deloitte Tohmatsu Financial Advisory LLC (10.0%)
01
65.7%
Strategy& (9.5%)
14
64.2%
A.T. Kearney (9.1%)
16
62.7%
Bain & Company (8.1%)
04
61.2%
McKinsey (8.0%)
15
59.7%
McKinsey and Co (7.7%)
07
58.2%
Charles River Associates (7.5%)
06
56.7%
Boston Consulting Group (7.5%)
01
55.2%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Willis Towers Watson (13.4%)
01
98.5%
Altman Solon (10.1%)
02
97.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton (6.9%)
62
95.5%
Accenture (6.5%)
04
94.0%
Capgemini (6.3%)
01
92.5%
McKinsey (5.2%)
65
91.0%
Simon Kucher Partners (5.2%)
No
89.6%
Boston Consulting Group (3.2%)
05
88.1%
Bain & Company (3.1%)
01
86.6%
PwC (2.7%)
05
85.1%
McKinsey and Co (2.7%)
No
83.6%
Deloitte (1.3%)
No
82.1%
FTI Consulting (1.3%)
01
80.6%
MorganFranklin Consulting (0.2%)
23
79.1%
CBIZ (0.2%)
06
77.6%
Wavestone (0.2%)
22
76.1%
Alpha FMC (0.2%)
New
74.6%
FactSet Research Systems (0.2%)
07
73.1%
Deloitte (0.2%)
24
71.6%
Ocean Tomo (0.2%)
New
70.1%
Keystone Strategy (0.2%)
01
68.7%
Arthur D. Little (0.2%)
19
67.2%
KPMG (0.2%)
07
65.7%
Efficio Limited (0.2%)
New
64.2%
Mars & Co (0.2%)
03
62.7%
MasterCard Advisors (0.2%)
08
61.2%
Russell Reynolds Associates (0.2%)
New
59.7%
Riveron (0.2%)
22
58.2%
The Brattle Group (0.2%)
28
56.7%
Infosys (0.2%)
19
55.2%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.