CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2014

This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2012, 2013, 2014.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Prudential
03
98.6%
Booz Allen Hamilton
01
97.3%
A.T. Kearney
01
95.9%
McKinsey and Co
06
94.6%
Gallup Consulting
24
93.2%
Alvarez & Marsal
03
91.9%
Mercer
04
90.5%
Deloitte
No
89.2%
Parthenon Group-EY
15
87.8%
Boston Consulting Group
02
86.5%
Simon Kucher Partners
36
85.1%
Analysis Group
07
83.8%
Navigant Consulting
07
82.4%
Accenture
03
81.1%
Charles River Associates
01
79.7%
LEK Consulting
02
78.4%
FTI Consulting
26
77.0%
Wood Mackenzie
15
75.7%
Capgemini
08
74.3%
AlixPartners
36
73.0%
NERA Economic Consulting
14
71.6%
Bain & Company
03
70.3%
Oliver Wyman
08
68.9%
PwC
04
67.6%
Cornerstone Research
12
66.2%
Mesirow Financial
05
64.9%
OCC Strategy Consultants
01
63.5%
Falconi
New
62.2%
Keystone Strategy
New
60.8%
IBM
12
59.5%

Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Teneo (62.5%)
No
98.5%
Cornerstone Research (32.4%)
04
97.1%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (31.2%)
New
95.6%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (30.4%)
New
94.1%
Protiviti (24.3%)
03
92.6%
Berkeley Research Group (23.6%)
New
91.2%
Gallup Consulting (22.5%)
New
89.7%
Analysis Group (21.4%)
03
88.2%
Jones Lang LaSalle (21.2%)
17
86.8%
Oliver Wyman (20.7%)
05
85.3%
IBM (20.4%)
03
83.8%
Navigant Consulting (19.6%)
17
82.4%
AlixPartners (17.7%)
38
80.9%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (17.7%)
04
79.4%
NERA Economic Consulting (17.7%)
06
77.9%
Towers Watson (17.7%)
12
76.5%
ZS Associates (16.6%)
10
75.0%
Keystone Strategy (16.1%)
New
73.5%
Capco (15.6%)
03
72.1%
Huron Consulting Group (14.9%)
35
70.6%
Deloitte (14.8%)
03
69.1%
PwC (14.7%)
01
67.6%
Mesirow Financial (14.1%)
10
66.2%
Accenture (13.8%)
05
64.7%
McKinsey and Co (12.9%)
02
63.2%
Simon Kucher Partners (12.5%)
New
61.8%
Wood Mackenzie (12.5%)
11
60.3%
McGladrey LLP (12.5%)
13
58.8%
Boston Consulting Group (12.4%)
09
57.4%
SAP AG (11.2%)
New
55.9%

Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Intrum Justitia (62.5%)
No
98.7%
Mesirow Financial (44.6%)
No
97.3%
BDO Consulting (42.5%)
01
96.0%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (39.0%)
01
94.7%
Falconi (35.4%)
New
93.3%
Kaiser Associates (30.3%)
03
92.0%
Parthenon Group-EY (30.1%)
No
90.7%
Booz Allen Hamilton (27.0%)
03
89.3%
Public Financial Management (24.0%)
01
88.0%
Jones Lang LaSalle (24.0%)
04
86.7%
Arthur D. Little (22.5%)
01
85.3%
Stax (22.5%)
01
84.0%
McGladrey LLP (21.2%)
14
82.7%
Advisory Board Company (20.8%)
01
81.3%
Huron Consulting Group (20.6%)
47
80.0%
Protiviti (17.3%)
16
78.7%
Compass Lexecon (15.6%)
14
77.3%
Bain & Company (15.4%)
No
76.0%
Navigant Consulting (15.3%)
02
74.7%
Alvarez & Marsal (13.8%)
01
73.3%
Capco (13.0%)
44
72.0%
Boston Consulting Group (13.0%)
03
70.7%
Strategy& (12.8%)
09
69.3%
Infosys (12.5%)
08
68.0%
Oliver Wyman (11.7%)
03
66.7%
McKinsey and Co (11.5%)
02
65.3%
ZS Associates (10.2%)
12
64.0%
The Brattle Group (10.2%)
15
62.7%
FTI Consulting (10.1%)
01
61.3%
Mercer (9.5%)
37
60.0%

Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.

Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
BDO Consulting (20.3%)
No
98.7%
Gallup Consulting (14.5%)
No
97.3%
Public Financial Management (7.8%)
01
96.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton (7.5%)
01
94.7%
Boston Consulting Group (5.1%)
No
93.3%
McKinsey and Co (3.8%)
No
92.0%
Deloitte (2.9%)
03
90.7%
Accenture (2.4%)
01
89.3%
Capgemini (2.3%)
54
88.0%
IBM (2.3%)
56
86.7%
Oliver Wyman (2.1%)
02
85.3%
ZS Associates (2.0%)
04
84.0%
PwC (1.1%)
02
82.7%
Bain & Company (0.6%)
53
81.3%
Triage Consulting Group (0.3%)
New
80.0%
Intrum Justitia (0.3%)
02
78.7%
Walmart (0.3%)
02
77.3%
Arthur D. Little (0.3%)
01
76.0%
Ericsson (0.3%)
New
74.7%
Milliman Inc (0.3%)
New
73.3%
Meketa Investment Group (0.3%)
New
72.0%
Financo (0.3%)
03
70.7%
Bates White Economic Consulting (0.3%)
03
69.3%
Johnson Associates (0.3%)
03
68.0%
EVA Dimensions (0.3%)
02
66.7%
Stax (0.3%)
01
65.3%
Novumed LLC (0.3%)
New
64.0%
Wilshire Associates (0.3%)
New
62.7%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (0.2%)
New
61.3%
HBR Consulting (0.2%)
01
60.0%

Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name

Companies with only 10 or more submissions included

The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics

Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available

Methodology FAQ

How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.