CONSULTING DIVERSITY STATS - As of December, 2015
This employer diversity data is based solely on user submissions to the WSO Company Database for interviews and employment during 2013, 2014, 2015.
Racial Diversity
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Mercer
06
98.6%
Gallup Consulting
03
97.3%
A.T. Kearney
No
95.9%
McKinsey and Co
No
94.6%
Jones Lang LaSalle
26
93.2%
Prudential
05
91.9%
Boston Consulting Group
03
90.5%
Alvarez & Marsal
02
89.2%
Booz Allen Hamilton
07
87.8%
Deloitte
02
86.5%
Accenture
03
85.1%
Bain & Company
10
83.8%
Charles River Associates
02
82.4%
Advisory Board Company
27
81.1%
Navigant Consulting
02
79.7%
Analysis Group
04
78.4%
IBM
13
77.0%
Simon Kucher Partners
07
75.7%
Parthenon Group-EY
10
74.3%
Capgemini
01
73.0%
LEK Consulting
05
71.6%
Capco
13
70.3%
AlixPartners
03
68.9%
PwC
No
67.6%
OCC Strategy Consultants
02
66.2%
FTI Consulting
09
64.9%
Cornerstone Research
02
63.5%
Falconi
No
62.2%
Stax
36
60.8%
NERA Economic Consulting
09
59.5%
Percentile rank on racial diversity based on how balanced companies are across five primary groups: Caucasian, Asian, African American, Latino/Spanish Origin and Other
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Female Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Marshall and Stevens (63.0%)
New
98.6%
Campbell Alliance (52.5%)
New
97.1%
ClearView Healthcare Partners (31.5%)
No
95.7%
Wood Mackenzie (30.7%)
23
94.3%
Cornerstone Research (28.0%)
03
92.9%
Protiviti (25.7%)
01
91.4%
IBM (24.9%)
04
90.0%
ZS Associates (24.1%)
09
88.6%
Berkeley Research Group (21.5%)
03
87.1%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (21.5%)
06
85.7%
Prudential (21.5%)
24
84.3%
Capco (21.5%)
07
82.9%
Oliver Wyman (21.3%)
03
81.4%
Navigant Consulting (20.6%)
02
80.0%
Analysis Group (20.6%)
07
78.6%
Ericsson (19.2%)
32
77.1%
Mu Sigma (19.2%)
New
75.7%
Jones Lang LaSalle (19.2%)
09
74.3%
A.T. Kearney (19.0%)
13
72.9%
Deloitte (18.3%)
01
71.4%
Towers Watson (18.0%)
05
70.0%
Simon Kucher Partners (17.9%)
04
68.6%
NERA Economic Consulting (17.9%)
08
67.1%
AlixPartners (17.9%)
11
65.7%
Parthenon Group-EY (17.5%)
19
64.3%
PwC (15.8%)
04
62.9%
Accenture (15.4%)
03
61.4%
Huron Consulting Group (15.4%)
08
60.0%
Booz Allen Hamilton (15.1%)
04
58.6%
Public Financial Management (14.4%)
37
57.1%
Estimate percentage of females is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Athletic Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Intrum Justitia (62.2%)
No
98.7%
Kaiser Associates (42.2%)
04
97.4%
BDO Consulting (38.9%)
No
96.1%
Riveron (35.2%)
New
94.7%
Falconi (35.2%)
No
93.4%
Parthenon Group-EY (33.9%)
01
92.1%
Kurt Salmon Associates Capital Advisors (28.3%)
03
90.8%
Booz Allen Hamilton (27.6%)
No
89.5%
Jones Lang LaSalle (23.5%)
01
88.2%
The Parthenon Group (22.2%)
New
86.8%
McGladrey LLP (21.1%)
02
85.5%
Alvarez & Marsal (18.7%)
08
84.2%
Compass Lexecon (16.4%)
04
82.9%
Stax (15.9%)
02
81.6%
Protiviti (15.6%)
01
80.3%
Huron Consulting Group (15.2%)
01
78.9%
Capco (15.2%)
04
77.6%
Boston Consulting Group (15.0%)
04
76.3%
Bain & Company (14.9%)
01
75.0%
Advisory Board Company (14.1%)
06
73.7%
Strategy& (13.8%)
02
72.4%
Navigant Consulting (13.3%)
03
71.1%
Sapient Global Markets (12.4%)
08
69.7%
Oliver Wyman (12.2%)
01
68.4%
Mercer (12.1%)
05
67.1%
Prudential (11.7%)
09
65.8%
Infosys (11.1%)
03
64.5%
McKinsey and Co (10.9%)
02
63.2%
ZS Associates (10.6%)
02
61.8%
Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (10.1%)
03
60.5%
Estimated percentage of varsity athletes is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics.
Military Representation
Firm
YoY Δ
Percentile
Gallup Consulting (16.9%)
01
98.7%
BDO Consulting (12.6%)
01
97.4%
Public Financial Management (12.6%)
No
96.1%
Booz Allen Hamilton (6.5%)
No
94.7%
McKinsey and Co (3.3%)
01
93.4%
Deloitte (3.2%)
01
92.1%
Capgemini (3.0%)
02
90.8%
Boston Consulting Group (2.9%)
03
89.5%
IBM (2.4%)
01
88.2%
ZS Associates (2.1%)
02
86.8%
PwC (1.2%)
02
85.5%
Oliver Wyman (1.2%)
01
84.2%
Accenture (0.8%)
05
82.9%
Bain & Company (0.6%)
No
81.6%
Intrum Justitia (0.2%)
01
80.3%
Milliman Inc (0.2%)
04
78.9%
Argus Information and Advisory Services (0.2%)
12
77.6%
Carlisle and Gallagher Consulting Group (0.2%)
New
76.3%
HealthScape Advisors (0.2%)
New
75.0%
Innosight (0.2%)
New
73.7%
Kaiser Associates (0.2%)
13
72.4%
Novumed LLC (0.2%)
05
71.1%
Marshall and Stevens (0.2%)
New
69.7%
The Parthenon Group (0.2%)
New
68.4%
Wilshire Associates (0.2%)
03
67.1%
The Retirement Group (0.2%)
13
65.8%
Frost and Sullivan (0.2%)
11
64.5%
CSC (0.2%)
05
63.2%
Ericsson (0.2%)
10
61.8%
Riveron (0.2%)
New
60.5%
Estimated percentage of employees with military association is shown in parenthesis after the company name
Companies with only 10 or more submissions included
The up and down arrows next to each company represent the relative increase or decrease in position compared to the prior year report. The "= =" equal signs means there was no change and the "+ +" plus signs indicate a new company on the statistics
Company Specific Salary and Bonus Data Available
Methodology FAQ
How often is this data updated?
The rankings are constantly changing and evolving based on additional data we collect every day. The graphs and tables use the data from YTD and the prior 2 years. See tabs located above on this page to access previous year rankings.
Why do the average compensation numbers look so low?
Remember that the compensation you are accustomed to hearing for top performers in the top groups in New York is well above the average for cities around the world. The compensation average graphs are a global average which includes regional cities and groups that bring the average down. If you would like company and group specific compensation data, please visit the WSO Company Database.
Where does this data come from?
The compensation, review and interview data comes from WSO member submissions to the WSO Company Database. With over 50,000 submissions to date across thousands of companies, the database is solely a representation of what our members were paid and how they rank companies on various metrics. Please see below for a detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database.
What are the percentile rankings based on?
The percentile rankings of companies listed here are based on the current YTD and the prior two years of data for companies that received at least one vote. The simple average scores are converted into an Adjusted Score before the companies are ranked to take into account companies with a smaller sample size. This method uses Bayesian Statistics.
Why do you use Bayesian Statistics to adjust scores?
This methodology is used in order to account for standard deviation in rankings. As a company gets more rankings and data, we have more confidence that the average ranking is a true reflection of reality, so this is reflected in the adjusted scores and Percentile rankings. Learn more about Bayesian Statistics here.
Why don't I see company XYZ?
Some great smaller firms may not be represented in the rankings for the simple reason that we have not collected enough data to represent them accurately or for us to have enough data to display them at all.
What is the geographical representation of the submissions?
The WSO user base is very US-centric with approximately 70% of all submissions coming within the United States of America. Please see the detailed breakdown of the member statistics for those that have contributed to the database. For more company and city specific compensation, please visit the WSO Company Database.
or Want to Sign up with your social account?