Hello guys, Can someone explain me in detail how categorizing something as NWC instead of Debt-like item changes Equity value. The line item would be "deferred revenues" lets assume EV = 100 and Deferred Revenues = 10
Thanks for your help
| +519 | Change My Mind: Banks Shouldn’t Hire Foreigners at All | 122 | 6s |
| +317 | Article - UBS’ Investment Bank Keeps Losing Ground | 40 | 5h |
| +301 | Don’t work at UBS - UBS Sucks | 30 | 3h |
| +79 | Should My Intern Get a Return Offer? | 31 | 1h |
| +60 | When to Leave Office as Intern | 8 | 3d |
| +49 | Best IB Group Overall? | 28 | 4h |
| +39 | Would you rather be a Touse Squid or a Bouse Mogger in IB | 2 | 3d |
| +33 | What do you say to ppl who don’t know EVR/LAZ/CVP/PJT | 28 | 8h |
| +31 | STEM student lost in London IB recruiting | 17 | 1d |
| +29 | F*ck it I'm Going to Med School | 12 | 30m |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
reiter13, hey, look at the bright side, at least you didn't get a ton of monkey shit thrown at you...here is my best guess on threads that might be helpful:
More suggestions...
I hope those threads give you a bit more insight.
I have another question regarding that topic, as I was not able to find it anywhere else:
What if you were to wake up one day and suddenly decide to classify a proportion of Deferred Revenues, lets say 20m out of 100m total, as debt-like item - but everything else stays the same as before e.g. Target NWC
Given that your Target NWC stays the same, the effect of classifying a proportion of Deferred Revenues as debt-like item, will not change the ending Equity Value of the company - correct?
Thank you
It simply depends if it was already factored into the target. If that NWC target was set inclusive of the Def Rev (say NWC target was $100, including Def Rev of $10) and the purchase agreement definition reads that Def Rev is debt (or debt-like), you are effectively having to deliver against $110 instead of $100 b/c you have removed a current liability and decreased the denominator.
Note: this is the same effect as the scenario below, just through a different mechanism. Either way, the effective purchase price is being reduced by $10.
Commodi soluta et eligendi ut quod enim expedita reiciendis. Commodi iste tempora perspiciatis quia voluptatum quia.
Voluptas numquam quae deleniti quisquam. Pariatur sed neque repudiandae aut rerum. Veritatis porro magnam placeat et placeat ut.
Omnis illum necessitatibus officiis quis. Esse voluptates nemo debitis rerum modi. Non voluptas possimus assumenda necessitatibus dolor laborum nemo. Atque atque ullam non est rerum hic nulla consequuntur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...