Which funds are ticking time bombs?

Inspired by all the American Securities news recently. I recall when I was graduating from business school they were among the top targets for people, above some of the MFs for their perceived returns, culture, and growth trajectory only for them to blow up  out of nowhere.

Any other firms come to mind that are seemingly doing well but could be in trouble in the near term?

163 Comments
 

Tons of firms went from $1b funds to $5-10b funds the last 10-15 years. A lot of those will have issues going forward similar to AS.

 

Judging by universally stretched P/E ratios, a FED rate that won't go much below 4.5%, and the speed of the Nvidia selloff yesterday......pretty much any fund that isn't short is flirting with annihilation.

Get busy living
 

UFOinsider

Judging by universally stretched P/E ratios, a FED rate that won't go much below 4.5%, and the speed of the Nvidia selloff yesterday......pretty much any fund that isn't short is flirting with annihilation.

It's just fun to come back and read this every once in a while XD

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

My question is how fucked can they actually be? They’ve scaled to ~$150B AUM and have had very solid returns - are we just expecting straight donuts, long holds, and a heavy loss ratio in those few funds that were deployed in 2020-2022 (I believe it was around ~$59B deployed in that time period by TB).

They’ve even raised a majority of their NEXT flagship fund - are LPs just more blind than the average people on this thread? Or there’s more to it? I would love to hear any further thoughts.

 

Don’t get me wrong they’ve made some steep purchases but what a lot of people underwrite / give them credit for purchasing companies at isn’t really what they’re purchasing them for. Instead of the Revenue / ARR multiples people quote, they’re most often buying off a synergized PF EBITDA figure on Day 1 and are going deep operationally (systems, HC cuts, etc) to get there over first 6-12 months of the hold.

 

Vista made some overpriced investments but will be fine. Certainly not one of the worst offenders from ‘20-22.

 

Vista made some overpriced investments but will be fine. Certainly not one of the worst offenders from ‘20-22.

Their issue is their funds post 2005 suck...2007 fund still has 3 companies and fund has a 7% IRR. The remaining companies are some how held at cost but are likely donuts. Best days are long, long behind them. Follow the spin outs of Vista if you want funds actually on the rise.

 

Hasn't both THL and Golden Gate been basically hobbling along for years anyway? Charlesbank likely going way of AmSec (except already was smaller to start with). 

What you are seeing is industry wide retrenchment - LPs are pulling money out. Bubble burst etc. The cycle is just slower in PE because the capital is locked up for so long. So many portfolio BKs / distressed exchanges / liability management is taking place and will take place. We haven't even hit a recession yet. 

 

The best way to judge from the outside is looking at fundraising trajectory and exit rates - ultimately, funds need to give money back to raise new funds (at least eventually in the long run). If a fund hasn’t exited anything in the last few years it’s probably a sign that a) they don’t have anything going well enough to exit and b) LPs aren’t as likely to want to re-up if they already have a bunch of money tied up with a manager.

If a fund went from a $1b fund to a $5b in the last 5 years, it means they either have phenomenal returns and will keep growing or they will stumble soon. A fund that has been steadier (but growing slightly) just has much lower risk of reverting to a previous smaller size.

This current fundraise is where cracks are showing. Everyone raised monster funds in 2021. Most are now re-raising since everyone did so many deals in ‘21-22.

If someone is posting a good fundraiser (getting to the same size or larger reasonably quickly) that is a great sign in today’s climate.

If they’re cutting targets or have just been in market for years, stay away.

 

The best way to judge from the outside is looking at fundraising trajectory and exit rates - ultimately, funds need to give money back to raise new funds (at least eventually in the long run). If a fund hasn’t exited anything in the last few years it’s probably a sign that a) they don’t have anything going well enough to exit and b) LPs aren’t as likely to want to re-up if they already have a bunch of money tied up with a manager.

If a fund went from a $1b fund to a $5b in the last 5 years, it means they either have phenomenal returns and will keep growing or they will stumble soon. A fund that has been steadier (but growing slightly) just has much lower risk of reverting to a previous smaller size.

This current fundraise is where cracks are showing. Everyone raised monster funds in 2021. Most are now re-raising since everyone did so many deals in ‘21-22.

If someone is posting a good fundraiser (getting to the same size or larger reasonably quickly) that is a great sign in today’s climate.

If they’re cutting targets or have just been in market for years, stay away.

Agreed, although my main caveat is this can take years to play out. For example, if a fund raised in 2022 with 2-3 investment period. Then, they'll try to raise the next fund over 2 years. Now, it's ~2026/2027. Just be cognizant it takes time. 

 

Honestly any fund that marks to 2x gross but is sitting at like 0.1 DPI with no exits on the horizon. They’re fucked if they need to fundraise any time soon. And that could apply to a number of late stage growth, crossover, momentum players. It’s why you’re seeing funds take NAV loans, synthetic liquidity solutions, etc. Pretty jammed up exit environment if we don’t see M&A and capital markets activity pick up in the next year or so. And then the question is do you get rid of the shitcos to double down on something you’ll get high returns from later on, or do you sell what is being valued highest today to get more cash back to LPs and use that goodwill to fundraise into a hopefully nice vintage. All depends on your time horizon and the relative quality of opportunities you’re seeing within your strategy. Note - this is mostly from a minority investor perspective. 

 

Platinum is the most inaccurately portrayed fund on this website. Every time they’re mentioned it’s like “so many zerosssss” but, like, that’s the model. You probably have a bunch of dogs at KPS too but the hit threshold is uncapped because of the value orientation. People don’t like Platinum because of the specific personalities there and the fact that the basketball team sucks and other intangible factors but there’s a reason LPs flock

 

Victim of its own success in some ways. Tac Opps 10 years ago was a very cool group that did everything from growth/VC to MM buyouts to distressed credit to infrastructure—i.e., anything that was compelling but fell outside the mandate of BX’s other funds. Over time, the more successful parts of the business (growth, infra, etc.) were spun out into their own separate strategies. Meanwhile other funds started strategies focused on weird illiquid stuff so BTO wasn’t the only game in town. As a result the group is a shadow of what it once was. 

 

For most financial sponsors, the key is how leveraged you are. If your leverage is really high, then with interest rates being much higher, the private credit guys and the money lenders are going to eat into your equity really fast, and before you know it, you've blown multiple covs and either need to cure it with more money (which often doesn't work) or surrender the company to the lenders. Less leveraged players can just hold onto bad investments for a long time and tread water, and this generally doesn't result in losing catastrophic amounts of money, but the returns are also lackluster, which hurts big-time on the fundraising side.

Hold periods are getting longer. There are lots of failed M&A processes. M&A deal volume is pretty low compared to COVID times, but has picked up a little bit from the trough. A lot of people who would normally consider going to market are holding off because they know that people are not willing to buy at the same multiples they were a few years ago. There's a lot of amend and extend, backroom negotiations, and grappling with lenders going on right now. 

Private equity feels like perma-equity sometimes, that is, when they don't get their clocks cleaned by being overlevered. A lot of healthcare rollups are in real big trouble.

 
kellycriterion

For most financial sponsors, the key is how leveraged you are. If your leverage is really high, then with interest rates being much higher, the private credit guys and the money lenders are going to eat into your equity really fast, and before you know it, you've blown multiple covs and either need to cure it with more money (which often doesn't work) or surrender the company to the lenders. Less leveraged players can just hold onto bad investments for a long time and tread water, and this generally doesn't result in losing catastrophic amounts of money, but the returns are also lackluster, which hurts big-time on the fundraising side.

Hold periods are getting longer. There are lots of failed M&A processes. M&A deal volume is pretty low compared to COVID times, but has picked up a little bit from the trough. A lot of people who would normally consider going to market are holding off because they know that people are not willing to buy at the same multiples they were a few years ago. There's a lot of amend and extend, backroom negotiations, and grappling with lenders going on right now. 

Private equity feels like perma-equity sometimes, that is, when they don't get their clocks cleaned by being overlevered. A lot of healthcare rollups are in real big trouble.

Last sentence I've seen first hand with people i know at port co's. Specifically in practice roll-ups.

 

A lot of the doctors figured out that you can just work less and still do okay, even if practice profitability goes down. They aren't incentivized to do more like an owner would. RCM and integrations are a nightmare. Sometimes people will try to consolidate the payor contracts, but the payors always know best and have the last laugh. There's a lot of other things I could mention. It's a mess.

 

I mean yes.. they are literally all bidding on the same deals 

I've pounded the table on here that these $10b+ funds have little to chance of producing returns we saw from these same firms in the past (when they were $1b funds). There's only so many companies they can bid on and they're all valued at billions of dollars, making a 2-3x return much harder to produce than buying a company at $100mm EV. Taking a public software company that's down 90% from ATHs (and on it's way to a donut because public markets destroy companies that will never make a profit and have declining revenue to boot). Classic catching a falling knife.

 

I get that it’s technically paywalled and the numbers aren’t perfect but these kinds of discussions would be really well-served by people citing actual Preqin and PitchBook data on returns, marks, DPI, etc. Some notable zeros that hit the news, or even some 0.8x tech investments from 2021, are not a barrier to decent fund-level returns and successful raises.

I just feel like this forum has had way too much of the “oh they’re going under” / “but they just raised their target!” dichotomy or the inverse “Parter Name x is a stone cold killer” / “fund marked at 1.5x” juxtaposition when talking about the very same fund and it ends up just not being helpful.

 

What's going on with BX Life Sciences? Thought that was a growth area for them.

like everyhing BX related they have to go so damn big things don't work anymore. Clarus was like $200mm fund before BX bought them and now it's 15x that, just doesn't work at that scale.

 

The founder is such a pompous tool box - "we like to take our time with investments, we are very selective". Yeah, good job selecting a turd. Lack of ambition masquerading as prudence.

SOFR+400
 

Est veniam cumque qui accusamus. Ut saepe assumenda laboriosam repudiandae. Explicabo aperiam dolores sit eius. Nam magnam quis amet recusandae officiis tenetur. Eum voluptate ut rerum temporibus incidunt amet molestiae.

Quia perspiciatis quibusdam iusto nesciunt autem omnis et. Vitae culpa dolores provident consequatur. Laboriosam qui explicabo ab debitis voluptatum rerum nisi fugit.

Quo voluptates ipsam et qui est aliquid. Culpa cum quod vitae neque.

 

Hic sunt cum voluptas eum. Est eum nostrum voluptas eveniet praesentium. Amet laudantium nobis dolor voluptas. Mollitia voluptas voluptas qui rerum.

Dicta consequuntur molestiae occaecati numquam consequatur. Fuga dolores sit non alias. Deleniti et autem deleniti aut aperiam et illum. Ad veniam hic aliquam autem non quia cumque.

Tempore quis quis modi ex. Accusantium necessitatibus sit nihil error alias sit possimus. Iste distinctio ut doloribus cupiditate. Quia suscipit voluptatem nobis temporibus. Recusandae quas ab non excepturi illum eveniet.

 

Alias animi alias autem omnis tenetur nam quasi. Mollitia ut ut perspiciatis nobis facere. Qui ad quia aspernatur voluptatibus.

Facere provident officiis quibusdam nostrum soluta temporibus. Corporis eveniet quod quaerat illum corporis laudantium. Ab omnis eos esse non voluptatibus et. Consequatur pariatur illo assumenda dolorem.

Fuga incidunt quia laudantium error. Autem sequi deleniti voluptas distinctio sit. Nostrum debitis non cumque. Qui quibusdam adipisci natus laborum quis ut officiis odio. Ipsum sit facilis maiores dignissimos atque.

 

Quia harum suscipit et fugiat nesciunt nostrum illo. Repellendus illum distinctio quam pariatur omnis eos. Est dignissimos ipsum praesentium quod ut voluptatem odio.

Qui quam ut ut eos tempore omnis quidem. Quasi rerum eos sapiente voluptas. Rerum id veritatis consequatur dolorem.

Dolores dolorum vel omnis aliquam. Omnis qui rerum itaque officiis recusandae. Deserunt aliquid quisquam aspernatur occaecati molestiae consequatur magnam.

Atque odio eos iusto doloribus numquam voluptatem eaque. Quo exercitationem qui voluptas quia.

 

Quae nemo aliquam ipsa. Qui aut suscipit dolorem officia repellat aut.

Voluptatem similique et eum soluta architecto illo ullam. Nostrum consequatur magni velit recusandae nisi enim aliquid. Fugiat occaecati molestiae quibusdam ad harum dolores. Magni dolores consectetur quis iste ut et. Accusamus fugiat officiis qui aut incidunt.

 

Et ad molestias earum est. Aut deserunt sint similique consequatur.

Est optio et ut eaque voluptatem quis ab. Ut rem consequuntur doloremque voluptates. Saepe nostrum ea dolores et autem omnis. Fuga delectus sint ut nihil sed possimus modi.

Labore earum aliquam magnam enim rerum quam dignissimos. Quaerat est adipisci praesentium consequatur et facere molestiae. Et nobis nihil et autem et enim illo. Enim ducimus iusto officiis labore.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”