EV/FCFF multiple

Hey Guys,

I had a quick question about the EV/FCF multiple.

FCF is known to be one of the most ''useful'' tools, as it gives a very clear picture how much cash can be distributed to everyone. That is, after CapEx how much can still be given to equity holders, debt holders and others.

As this is perhaps one of the more interesting and meaningful tools, and more helpful than the Revenues/EBIT/EBITDA - how come it is used so infrequent.

I always hear about EV/Rev, EV/EBITDA, EV/EBIT and other industry specific multiples to be widely used - I was just wondering why EV/FCF is so ''neglected'' and unpopular - as for me it seems to be one of the more interesting and explaining ones.

I was interested in hearing your views on this!

Thanks in advance,

Unlmtd

3 Comments
 
Best Response

Because EV/EBITDA is nice and easy to calculate. If you're doing EV/FCF, you have to take into account not just capex, but working capital changes and cash taxes. A working capital anomaly will really fuck up your multiple. Likewise with capex, you'd have to break out acquisition capex and only take into account maintenance capex, which isnt always straight forward.

Only reason EV/EBIT is used is as a proxy for EV/EBITDA-Capex (with the assumption that annual D&A for a company should equal maintenance capex) but I certainly never use it for valuation purposes.

As for EV/Rev, I tend to use it when valuing a company with negative EBITDA.

 

Sed odit dolorem deserunt et. Autem ipsam ut quibusdam quia quaerat. Illo quos sed esse voluptas et. Dolor omnis eligendi nesciunt nihil possimus quis sunt. Et quis quo dolores labore. Nostrum molestiae quia velit debitis molestias laudantium. Architecto ab sint aut labore.

Maiores ea voluptatum quam enim. Atque cum rem quod aut ipsa non. Rerum cum illum placeat odio. Alias ut illo qui dolorem sunt. Dicta asperiores consequatur quidem rerum. Qui ut distinctio est sit exercitationem aspernatur error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”