Best Research Platform?
My boss is done tired of the LSEG eikon/workspace product and wants to move to a different provider. We are currently considering Factset, Capital IQ and possibly Bloomberg but that might be overkill for us. What do you guys use/ prefer?
Based on the most helpful WSO content, FactSet and Capital IQ are both strong contenders for financial data and research platforms. FactSet is often praised for its user-friendly interface and robust financial benchmarking tools, while Capital IQ is known for its comprehensive data coverage and Excel integration capabilities. Bloomberg, while powerful, might indeed be overkill if your needs are more focused and budget-conscious.
If you're looking for alternatives, platforms like PrivCo and PitchBook are also worth considering, especially if private company data is a priority. Additionally, Crunchbase Pro has been highlighted as a cost-effective option for certain use cases.
Ultimately, the choice depends on your specific needs, such as the type of data you require, the level of customization, and your budget. It might be worth trialing a couple of these platforms to see which aligns best with your workflow.
Sources: Knowledge Sharing: Corporate Development / M&A, Top L/S in London and Hong Kong (e.g., Lone Pine, Viking, Coatue, Maverick, Darsana, etc.), What are your IB cheat codes?, TMT prep, Q&A: Equity Analyst at a Sovereign Wealth/Pension Fund
My opinion:
BBG + Alphasense + VA = most $$$
Low tier Refinitiv + VA = minimum
Estimates = VA is the standard for estimates (+ granular), required
Data terminal = BBG is the best, followed by Refinitiv/LSEG top tier, then Factset, then CapIQ, then Refinitiv low tier
Research management = Alphasense, followed by BBG, followed by Factset
VA?
Visible Alpha (owned by Capiq)
I’m not the biggest AS fan bc it’s really hit and miss depending on the sector but ya, idk how you can do the job without BBG and VA. Maybe no VA in a longer term SM set up but you’re playing with one arm tied if you don’t have it in a pod.
What use do you get out of AS that BBG doesn't offer out of curiosity? I feel like BBG is adding all their capabilities.
Agreed, BBG encroaching on AS. The Tegus acquisition makes sense in light of that...
Whilst Bloomberg is catching up on the UX for document search (still lagging AlphaSense), isn't the incremental functionality you get from AS the broader content sources that baked in to "smart search" from news sources, industry journals, trade publications, expert calls and internal firm content libraries?
maybe not relevant for L/S but what are thoughts on the broker/sell side research platforms? I've used citi velo, JPM MM, and marquee/GS Quant for rates/quant stuff and imo they provided a better dev/analyst experience than bbg
BBG (mkt data) + VA (consensus) + MaidenCentury (alt data) = trifecta
Bloomberg for most things - can use MODL for consensus and then document search for street research
Bamsec for filing/transcript search
Tegus / GLG for expert calls and transcripts
I didnt love AS when I tried it- mainly because I get all its functionality from the other stuff. They bought Tegus/BamSEC but it’s like $7k more to bundle it all vs leaving as-is.
AlphaSense is on a good product roadmap with the acquisition of Tegus. Good coverage of tech market with the database of call transcripts.
I’ve been using edmundsec vs bamsec the past year ish and I think I like it more. It’s a little more cumbersome for proxies but the table downloads across periods is way better than what bamsec gives you. The AI transcript summaries are decent too.
Edmundsec is great to pull BS IS CFS, but when it comes to segment data that's spread across multiple quarterly filings, it's a pain to untick the redundant tables. Can you speak a little into how you handle this challenge?
Would this be beneficial to you? Built a financial research platform, looking for honest feedback
I've been building something and I want to know if it's useful to people who actually work in finance. I'm not selling anything in this post — I'm looking for honest feedback from professionals who know what they need.
The historical data:
I've spent months acquiring and organizing 100+ years of financial data into a single queryable platform:
Would having 100 years of Kenneth French factor data in one database — queryable from Python or a web interface — be useful to anyone here? Would it changed your research and how?
The tools:
On top of that data, I built 76 ML-powered analytical tools. Here are the ones I think would matter most to this community:
For quant researchers:
For hedge fund PMs:
For portfolio managers:
For IB analysts:
For CROs / risk professionals:
For wealth managers:
The pricing thoughts, is this fair?: $50-100/month flat. No per-query costs. No API limits. No $24,000/year.
The honest limitations:
What I'm asking: Would this be beneficial to you? Would some of you financial folks be interested in what I have built? I'm looking for honest feedback — what's useful, what's missing, what answers a pain point of yours, what would make you consider using it?
If curious, I’m not young, approaching retirement myself. This all started when I attempted to build my own institutional grade RMS or Retirement Management System. It evolved and I realized it’s something unique and maybe worth sharing. Thus I ask for your feedback and thoughts and honestly doing ‘this’ wasn’t easy, little intimidating. Hopefully I articulated the above well.
Thank you for your time.
Is visible alpha really that necessary when everything is all about the whisper number now, not really about sell side consensus anymore?
in which country do u trade where sell side consensus doesnt matter. i would like to gain exposure. pls tell me
Obviously it still matters, but is visible alpha really that much better than other consensus aggregators ?
They’re all in the same area.
And again, the buyside bogey / whisper is frequently different from what consensus is anyway.
whomst Central Asia telecom credit trader
Bit of an old thread but we've built a pretty good alternative to FactSet/Capital IQ. We're ex M&A bankers.
Multiples .vc - it has both public and private comps (M&A and funding rounds). Data licensed by FactSet and Morningstar, so there isn't any loss in quality if that's a concern.
For public comps we have both historical and estimates data (3 years forward).
I wouldn't say it's a full workstation replacement (we don't have all bells and whistles like contact data, patent data etc.) - but for valuation/comps purposes it's pretty good, and we're fraction of the price vs. big guys.
No long term contracts too, it's a self-serve SaaS with free trial.
Sed repudiandae ut provident porro sequi non. Sed optio aliquam recusandae aut eveniet. Molestiae dolor non aperiam et.
Quam et modi amet laborum dolor. Et dignissimos accusantium cum saepe quidem. Consequatur qui alias laborum magnam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Optio corporis sint pariatur dignissimos. Consequatur aliquam quo dicta quas distinctio sed.
Sint numquam laudantium natus in est maxime vel. Quisquam mollitia harum veniam ipsa quia nulla sed sit. Voluptates temporibus voluptatem aperiam sit in.