Best Research Platform?

My boss is done tired of the LSEG eikon/workspace product and wants to move to a different provider. We are currently considering Factset, Capital IQ and possibly Bloomberg but that might be overkill for us. What do you guys use/ prefer?

24 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, FactSet and Capital IQ are both strong contenders for financial data and research platforms. FactSet is often praised for its user-friendly interface and robust financial benchmarking tools, while Capital IQ is known for its comprehensive data coverage and Excel integration capabilities. Bloomberg, while powerful, might indeed be overkill if your needs are more focused and budget-conscious.

If you're looking for alternatives, platforms like PrivCo and PitchBook are also worth considering, especially if private company data is a priority. Additionally, Crunchbase Pro has been highlighted as a cost-effective option for certain use cases.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your specific needs, such as the type of data you require, the level of customization, and your budget. It might be worth trialing a couple of these platforms to see which aligns best with your workflow.

Sources: Knowledge Sharing: Corporate Development / M&A, Top L/S in London and Hong Kong (e.g., Lone Pine, Viking, Coatue, Maverick, Darsana, etc.), What are your IB cheat codes?, TMT prep, Q&A: Equity Analyst at a Sovereign Wealth/Pension Fund

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Bloomberg for most things - can use MODL for consensus and then document search for street research 

Bamsec for filing/transcript search

Tegus / GLG for expert calls and transcripts

I didnt love AS when I tried it- mainly because I get all its functionality from the other stuff. They bought Tegus/BamSEC but it’s like $7k more to bundle it all vs leaving as-is. 

 

Would this be beneficial to you? Built a financial research platform, looking for honest feedback

I've been building something and I want to know if it's useful to people who actually work in finance. I'm not selling anything in this post — I'm looking for honest feedback from professionals who know what they need.

The historical data:

I've spent months acquiring and organizing 100+ years of financial data into a single queryable platform:

  • Kenneth French Data Library: 343 datasets, 85.5 million rows, 1926 to present. The complete library — not individual CSVs. One queryable database.
  • SEC EDGAR XBRL financials: 60 million rows of raw company fundamentals. Deeper than CapIQ's standardized version because you get the raw filings.
  • FRED macro data, FINRA short interest (3.8M rows), SEC 13F institutional holdings (134K rows), CFTC COT positioning (167K rows), SEC fail-to-deliver (1.8M rows)
  • 54 databases total, 568 million rows, 100+ years of history. All locally queryable. No API limits. No per-query costs.

Would having 100 years of Kenneth French factor data in one database — queryable from Python or a web interface — be useful to anyone here? Would it changed your research and how? 

The tools:

On top of that data, I built 76 ML-powered analytical tools. Here are the ones I think would matter most to this community:

For quant researchers:

  • Walk-forward validation with combinatorial purged cross-validation (Lopez de Prado's method from "Advances in Financial Machine Learning"). PBO (probability of backtest overfitting). Deflated Sharpe ratio. Implemented natively — not as a library call, as a standalone tool with 100 years of factor data built in.
  • Signal half-life computer: measures how long your signal works before it decays. IC at 1d/5d/10d/20d/60d/90d/180d lags. Crowding score (0-100). Recommended rebalance frequency.
  • Crash Oracle: Bayesian 60-day crash probability using 7-signal ensemble. No other platform has this.
  • Residual decomposition: what explains the 30% of returns your factor model doesn't capture?

For hedge fund PMs:

  • Short-squeeze risk alert: FINRA short interest + borrow rate + fail-to-deliver + utilization → 0-100 squeeze score per name
  • Kelly position sizing with crisis path Monte Carlo: adjusts position size for crisis events that multiply losses
  • Options Greeks + IV surface: Black-Scholes Greeks via QuantLib, implied vol surface, skew metrics
  • CDS spreads: FRED iTraxx/CDX indices + name-level estimate

For portfolio managers:

  • Tracking error calculator: ex-ante + ex-post, factor decomposition, rolling TE, mandate compliance check. "Am I within my 3.5% limit?" in one call.
  • Multi-period Brinson attribution: allocation/selection/interaction across multiple periods with linking algorithm
  • Client report generator: auto-generate performance reports with attribution, risk metrics. 6-8 hours/week → 5 minutes.
  • Tax-aware rebalancing: compute tax impact of every trade, suggest tax-loss harvesting

For IB analysts:

  • Comp set builder: save peer groups, compute all multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, EV/Sales, P/B), flag outliers, export formatted Excel. The 90-minute comp rebuild → 15 minutes.
  • DCF / LBO / accretion-dilution models: three model types with sensitivity tables
  • M&A precedent transactions database: 25+ deals with multiples, premiums, advisor roles
  • Excel integration: generates xlwings code that pulls live data into your models (BDP/BDH replacement)

For CROs / risk professionals:

  • CVA/DVA/FVA engine: counterparty credit risk adjustments via QuantLib. Rating-based default curves.
  • Multi-asset stress test: 9 historical scenarios (2008, 2020, 1987, 1998, 2010, 2022) + hypothetical (oil shock, dollar crisis, cyber attack)
  • Beta inflation factor: crisis beta / bull beta ratio. "Your beta inflates 1.36x in bear markets — use 1.35 for risk management, not 1.08."
  • Systemic anomaly timing: correlation distribution monitoring. Stress score 0-100. Early warning when correlations spike.

For wealth managers:

  • Estate planning calculator: GRAT, dynasty trust, ILIT, gifting strategy. Shows planning saves $93M on $50M estate.
  • Client vulnerability ranking: 6-factor behavioral scoring. Which clients are most likely to panic sell?
  • Sequence-of-returns analysis: same average return produces $2.57M (best case) or $0 (worst case) depending on order. Most powerful client communication tool I've seen.
  • Today vs 2008 comparison: 8 metrics compared. Client talking points for anxious clients.

The pricing thoughts, is this fair?:   $50-100/month flat. No per-query costs. No API limits. No $24,000/year. 

The honest limitations:

  • No live trading. This is a research platform, not an execution platform. If you need to place trades, this is not your tool.
  • Real-time tick data is not yet integrated (working on it). Live quotes use free sources (Yahoo Finance, Finnhub, Binance, TradingView) which can be upgraded to paid feeds.
  • No community yet. I'm posting here because I want feedback and thoughts, and I wanted that to start with people who know what good looks like.

What I'm asking: Would this be beneficial to you? Would some of you financial folks be interested in what I have built? I'm looking for honest feedback — what's useful, what's missing, what answers a pain point of yours, what would make you consider using it?

If curious, I’m not young, approaching retirement myself. This all started when I attempted to build my own institutional grade RMS or Retirement Management System. It evolved and I realized it’s something unique and maybe worth sharing. Thus I ask for your feedback and thoughts and honestly doing ‘this’ wasn’t easy, little intimidating. Hopefully I articulated the above well. 

  

Thank you for your time.

 

Is visible alpha really that necessary when everything is all about the whisper number now, not really about sell side consensus anymore?

 

Obviously it still matters, but is visible alpha really that much better than other consensus aggregators ?

They’re all in the same area.

And again, the buyside bogey / whisper is frequently different from what consensus is anyway.

 

Bit of an old thread but we've built a pretty good alternative to FactSet/Capital IQ. We're ex M&A bankers.

Multiples .vc - it has both public and private comps (M&A and funding rounds). Data licensed by FactSet and Morningstar, so there isn't any loss in quality if that's a concern.

For public comps we have both historical and estimates data (3 years forward). 

I wouldn't say it's a full workstation replacement (we don't have all bells and whistles like contact data, patent data etc.) - but for valuation/comps purposes it's pretty good, and we're fraction of the price vs. big guys. 

No long term contracts too, it's a self-serve SaaS with free trial.

 

Sed repudiandae ut provident porro sequi non. Sed optio aliquam recusandae aut eveniet. Molestiae dolor non aperiam et.

Quam et modi amet laborum dolor. Et dignissimos accusantium cum saepe quidem. Consequatur qui alias laborum magnam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (234) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”