54 Comments
 

Cash will decrease on the cash flow statement thru cash for investing activities.

Cash will decrease on the balance sheet, PP&E will increase in the asset section to offset that.

The income statement won't be immediately affected but will decrease thru depreciation in the future.

How was that? Anything I miss/get wrong? Thanks for the question

 
Most Helpful

Always this order

  1. Income statement - walk down to net income, including relevant lines based on the problem
  2. Cfs - start at net income, and work you way to cash including the relevant lines. Make sure to split cash from ops, investing, and financing if applicable 
  3. Balance sheet - start at net change in cash from the cfs, work down the asset side. Then work down l+e, making sure that you balance at the end
 

From revenue, deduct operating expenses.

Get your EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)

Take affect your ebit EBITA *1-tax rate

Add D&A back to get Net Operating Profit After Tax Rate (NOPAT)

Account for adjustments in net working capital and capex 

That should be your unlevered free cash flows.

-------

Working capital is a measure of what your company can use readily, after reinvestments and other payments like interest/tax/credits.

If your working capital goes up, it would mean you have more cash readily available. For example, if your accounts receivable was paid down and decreases, your working capital would increase so overall it would be a positive result. 

Thanks for the question, really helps me. Anything I mess up or miss?

 

1. CAPM, Covariance of the asset and market divided by the variance of the market

2. In an LBO, you purchase a company with ~2/3 debt, 1/3 equity. You pay off the debt progressively, using the companies FCF. And exit the company during a 4-8 year period. In an LBO, you're able to take advantage of the tax shield from debt cost and leverage to generate a return on invested equity.

3. Increase an IRR in an LBO by paying less for comp, selling for more, increase operational prospects, contributing less equity (more debt)

Little rusty but I think this is accurate

 

1. What's a sale-leaseback? Why would a company perform one?

2. What is PIK interest?

3. Why is a spin-off difficult to value? Does insider buying/selling in a spin-off have more significance than it would in a typical "company"? Why?

 

1. A sales-leaseback is done for the purpose of capital providing & an influx of cash. During a sales-leaseback one company will sell their facility and then lease it back.

2. PIK stands for Payment-in-Kind interest. The interest of dividend paid on this is not typically cash, but instead a security or equity.

3. I'm not sure for this, gonna have to come back to it. 

Thanks for the questions! If I missed anything, please lmk.

 

3. I'm not sure for this, gonna have to come back to it. 

You should actually try to respond to these as if you were in an interview setting (where you can't come back to it). In an interview, you'll have to give a response or at least a guess so it's better to just give a guess here and then you can get feedback on your guess / response.

 
  1. Correct on definition. For why would a company do one, I was looking for more of a “the company is strapped for cash” type answer. Yours isn’t wrong tho
  1. PIK interest is most commonly known/used as interest that has the option of delaying coupons until maturity. I would know this. Technically you’re right but yours is a more academic answer as opposed to a practical one
 

From a BB: Lets say your friend has a start up. Its current fiscal year reported a negative net income (covid). Is it a good LBO candidate for financial sponsors? Why?

 

I mean, with LBOs, aren't sponsors looking for companies with stable cash flow? My assumption is that doing an LBO on a brand new startup will be extremely risky, unless you can minimize leverage, which eats away at returns. I guess apart from that, its important to look into what caused net income to be negative - was it special items, or regular expenses generally being higher than revenue? Plus, would having negative net income pass the lender's test? I know that lenders will usually look at EBITDA for financial covenants, but wouldn't net income either make it impossible to obtain a loan or make it inhibitively expensive?

I mean overall, I think it's a bad candidate, due to unreliability of cash flows to pay down debt, and difficulty finding financing at a reasonable interest rate.

 

Quis est rem nihil et sit recusandae. Alias nesciunt doloremque rem porro.

Assumenda animi unde ut officia et non. Similique asperiores illum vel provident odio. Explicabo velit voluptas sed ut inventore voluptatem. Molestiae voluptas blanditiis non soluta.

Voluptatem tenetur molestias quam dolore iste officiis. Et quae incidunt est dolor iusto mollitia. Dicta voluptas et voluptas fugiat. Quam autem eum enim. Dignissimos laborum soluta velit minus. Cumque deleniti dolor molestiae iure. Placeat aut qui et qui.

Rerum aut perspiciatis ad odit et sit ut. Tenetur sint aut et ex earum. Sit consequatur aut placeat adipisci autem deserunt. Vel earum ipsa tempore.

 

Delectus sed autem provident. Dolor illo quia et sit alias ut aliquam facere.

Ea quidem error asperiores ex deleniti quasi vel. Culpa dolorem provident omnis sint. Tempora blanditiis dolorum exercitationem suscipit ut. Accusantium excepturi voluptatem mollitia autem id. Esse et occaecati repudiandae in quisquam beatae. Eos assumenda vel ut atque dolorum et.

Quo minus nostrum ab velit et. Ea rerum error esse et nemo reprehenderit eligendi eum.

Dolores beatae ut quo consequuntur. A quam in natus suscipit ea ex. Et accusantium nobis modi molestias et alias architecto nostrum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”