Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +173 | Evercore > Goldman and I don’t think it’s particularly close anymore | 63 | 2h |
| +156 | Article: Why UBS's Asian M&A bankers are thriving and UBS's American M&A bankers are not | 17 | 19h |
| +125 | I am a drunk MD AMA | 40 | 1d |
| +87 | UBS Offer Day | 30 | 1d |
| +75 | Santander IB? | 10 | 3d |
| +71 | I hate Wells Fargo | 19 | 20h |
| +51 | No return offer - feeling like a failure is an understatement | 20 | 15h |
| +50 | Think Twice before Recruiting for HOUSTON IB!! | 18 | 3h |
| +48 | How cooked am I as an incoming WF IB SA 2027? | 17 | 12h |
| +46 | WF Return offers | 28 | 2d |
Career Resources
Also curious
Whatever one that interests you the most, because that's the one your most likely to succeed in. But, if that wasn't a factor, I would be long healthcare groups if we are taking about over the course of a career. So much structural change in the industry, huge percent of GDP that will always need to exist, need for consolidation, shift in population demographics, regulatory changes, and niche knowledge base and experience will create demand for sell side bankers (which drives your criteria, pay and job security).
M&A in my opinion. You'll likely gain experience in a number of different industries and I presume (although not 100% sure) that you can filter into an industry group of your choosing as your career progresses if you so desire. The analytical skillset / process experience gained in m&a roles will also come in handy.
Except that you'll look like you're 40 when you're in your late 20s... I would suggest capital markets
Of course, this is a highly specific question that would require an understanding of the level and the firm, but a rule of thumb applies. An M&A banker can become a coverage or capital markets banker. It is much harder the other way around.
This is the complete opposite of my experience. At my bank, the coverage officers are the ones maintaining the relationships, and thus, not only do they have to be sharp but they also have to be personable and able to continue relationships with clients.
If somebody isn't good with clients/can't cut it as a director or MD in our coverage group, but we still like them and think they're sharp, we don't push them out per se, but rather give them the opportunity to join the M&A group or leave. So a coverage banker can become an M&A banker, but we don't take any M&A bankers as coverage officers in my group.
Clearly every firm and group is different to some extent, but if you look at the senior ranks at the top banks, most of the leading group heads have an M&A background, or even if they built their careers in an industry team, were primarily focused on M&A.
The only way you build consistent CEO relationships is by working on important M&A transactions (and to some extent IPOs but M&A much more).
But I do see that many firms are deemphasizing M&A groups, so what you say may hold increasingly more true over time. I personally think this is a strategic error..
If you're making a career out of banking, then the key criteria for "best group" should be what you are most interested in. It's one thing to, say, pick a group for an analyst stint based on exit opps, and it's not that big of a deal if you love it because you'll only be there 2 years anyway. But to succeed long-term in a field, you have to have a passion for it.
I would be in RX because I find it most interesting. Doesn't hurt that there are always companies in distress in any part of the cycle.
Lev Finance
Wild cyclicality
Capital markets for sure.
Thoughts on Tech and Internet groups?
Do you really want banking as a career path, especially given the entire exit ops landscape?
Do you really want banking as a career path, especially given the entire exit ops landscape?
bump
Some esoteric DCM/ECM sub-group... better hours and you develop a skillset that makes you irreplaceable. No exit ops but you'll climb the ladder and pay scale quicker than anyone in a coverage group most likely and won't be working as hard.
M&A product group for career banker (Originally Posted: 10/07/2017)
Hey guys, so I wanted to know what everyone thinks about working in the M&A product group of an investment bank for the long haul (ie career banker).
I’ve heard from various sources that as one progresses to VP and beyond, coverage bankers tend to make more money than their M&A product counterparts. Is this true? And if so, is this also true at a bank like Morgan Stanley?
I know MS M&A is heralded as one the most prestigious groups on the street, but is this simply because of the modeling experience/exit opportunities available to Analysts or do MS M&A career bankers make the comparable bonuses to other top MS coverage teams?
At least in my bank, product side has limited upward mobility post VP. Basically two to three MD from M&A partners with 10+ coverage MDs in each group. Coverage guys also have better options to go find their own business (e.g. go after small accounts) vs. M&A guys are kind of waiting to be asked to join accounts. That makes it even tougher given existing M&A gets called into everything before his director (even for the smallest thing).
Yeah that makes sense. Thanks a lot for the input bud! Much appreciated.
Desks for Career Longevity within Equity (Originally Posted: 12/13/2011)
Guys, So after talking with numerous seniors in the industry and some obvious developments it seems apparent that certain desks don't have a good outlook moving forward because on the transparency the internet has caused (including razor thin spreads, price aggregators etc.) The consensus seems to be that FX cash sales, cash equity sales, pretty much anything not OTC is not a good career path for sales.
With this is in mind I need to ask two questions:
-If you are going into sales within equities, what are the best desks with concern to longevity and lack of sensitivity to downsizing?
-I know to some degree trading will be replaced my machines, but how can I account for this in choosing potential trading desks? Any desks with better long term prospects?
Thanks. Hopefully this can be a good thread.
Voluptatem sit et error est. Non quis ab consequuntur est quia commodi.
Voluptatem reiciendis architecto impedit aut voluptas reprehenderit. Vel architecto magnam dignissimos.
Occaecati dolor omnis est dolores voluptas cupiditate maiores officiis. Nobis ipsam non et assumenda est alias. Commodi dolorum explicabo cumque occaecati at ipsum. Dolore facilis eos id atque vitae nulla dolore. Laboriosam ut non qui ut iure.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Illo id minus fugit doloremque quo quidem tempora. Omnis sequi voluptate qui ea deleniti recusandae sit dolores. Dolores sunt voluptates itaque qui.
Sint et explicabo facilis animi exercitationem quia. Iure nihil quasi explicabo qui recusandae a.