When calculating share prices using different cases in a DCF- upside, base, downside case, I came across something called management case and sponsor case, could someone elaborate on what it is? I couldn’t seem to find much information. Thanks in advance for helping!
Trending Content - Investment Banking Forum
| +326 | UBS Tech MD hires Son (from no-name college) as an Intern | 57 | 15h |
| +243 | Evercore Intern Seizure | 38 | 2h |
| +90 | [Official] 2026 IB Analyst Bonus Megathread (with 2025 Consolidated Pay and Perks/Benefits) | 12 | 2d |
| +55 | Is DCM actually underrated ? | 21 | 14h |
| +54 | JPM M&A is Gone??? Purely Coverage Banking??? | 22 | 5h |
| +46 | Are all Tech / TMT groups sweaty? | 33 | 1d |
| +40 | Losing my personality in Banking | 6 | 4h |
| +39 | Am I behind? 31 Year Old Analyst | 9 | 1d |
| +38 | Associate & Above IB exits | 16 | 2d |
| +31 | Incoming IB Analyst: Best Ways to Prepare? | 8 | 2d |
Career Resources
So in your DCF each "case" has different sets of assumptions for sales growth, capex, and other DCF items. Your bank's internal assumptions would be the data in your high/low/base case. The management case would be drawn from assumptions given to you by management; usually they're more aggressive since management wants as high a valuation as possible and they're usually more optimistic. The sponsor case would be drawn from assumptions a financial sponsor (i.e. private equity firm) would use; they would be way more conservative as the sponsor wants to pay as little as possible.
Thank you so much, so would you say this is reasonable-
Management case= upside case + 2%
Sponsor Case = Downside -1%*?
*-1% because, I already have a negative NPV but positive IRR.
Other post gotchu.
What I wanna know is how this can be an urgent question…
Well, this is a financial modelling course assignment due on Sunday, that my uni has started and the lecturers- 2 of them are really nice and I actually admire what they have done in their lives and want to do well in their course. One of them is an ex-BB MD, quit 2 yrs in after being an MD because one of his interns didn’t know how to calculate WACC, but could lay down the formula and calculate it if given a uni problem. Looking at that he said “this is fucked”(story he told as an icebreaker in the class)lmao, came to my uni and said he’ll teach with a lecturer that has been teaching for quite a while. Works part-time and only teaches this course and consults a boutique PE firm here as an advisor. Plus, my gpa, I am not kidding here is 3.69/4.00 and want it to go up to atleast 3.8, and have gotten 50/50 in this course till now, if I ace this assignment, I’m close to 3.8/4.00. The other lecturer was a HF Analyst, came back to do his PHD and decided to teach.
Voluptas delectus quis aspernatur qui. Fugiat aperiam possimus illo nulla officiis. Labore dolores beatae odio blanditiis eum iusto sequi. Quia ab enim non voluptatum consequatur quaerat voluptatibus. Provident illo aut sit excepturi quasi non qui. Quidem necessitatibus deleniti voluptates dicta nihil modi ratione. Magnam explicabo ipsum eveniet dignissimos dolorem ullam voluptatem.
Ex expedita provident aliquam consequuntur error placeat. Doloribus voluptatibus rerum est ex. Quasi at non at hic aut doloremque a. Et blanditiis qui enim iste neque. Accusamus et autem repellendus optio eum explicabo vero. Veniam esse deleniti quasi et labore.
Voluptatum ea sapiente amet ut praesentium. Harum nulla et qui amet. Et quia possimus a eaque consequatur pariatur.
Labore in adipisci omnis exercitationem. Voluptatum sunt et corrupti eaque quaerat est et. Est odit qui aspernatur nemo. Omnis possimus dolore ut optio. Minus voluptatem itaque molestiae quam id repellat. Cum maxime et quaerat placeat vel accusamus voluptatem iste. Suscipit et eius architecto adipisci sint.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...