What has been your total compensation progression in your career?

Found this post on Blind

Does finance have a similar TC progression (80k to 575k). To me, this seems very fast compared to IB.

Definitely faster than CorpFin roles, as I've googled.Assuming one has similar career trajectory as described in the picture.

Edit: Sorry, picture didn’t upload. Reloaded:

I don’t see a picture - what is the role / industry you are referring to in the post?

I’m in corporate finance and went from low 50’s to low 70’s to low 6 figures (6 figure base, also am getting bonus). This was 3 different jobs in 3 years.

If I can snag equity within the next 3 years and the company IPO’s then I could come out pretty well. Promotional track is fast so hoping I can get annual promotes.

I have not worked in banking, but a career could be 2 years as an analyst ($140k, $160k), 3 associate ($275k, $325k, $400k), then 3 years VP ($450k, $500k, $550k). The numbers can vary depending on where you are at - I know my friends at banks last year got paid more than usual, and you can see this on WSO as well.

If you read it properly they’re talking about IB comp progression. 

While it seems unlikely (when compared to the average path) it is in line with a good/steep trajectory in the PE/HF world (the latter part of the comp). I have seen (and experienced) large increases similar to above in the HF space. If you can get to some of the senior levels (or if you can be directly tied to PnL) there is serious competition and comp pressures (and if you are tied to PnL you can have very big years). My comp was very slow moving early on (different industry to start, then a junior person at a fund) and when I started really outperforming my peers it jumped very quickly, so my years 5-10 in my career were completely different (rate of change) than years 1-5, where it is usually the opposite (fast percent increases early on and then flatten out)  

Again, if you look at this relative to what average is, then it looks out of line. No idea whether this person is full of it, but you are going to get selection bias on these threads. 

Amazing.

Size of firms? Comp sounds like you have worked at large firms. If true, props for lasting that long. The few people I know who were at UMM/MF, I can only think of one person who lasted beyond 10+ years. Most leave these type of firms due to burnout or they are counseled out/limited room at the top due to office politics etc.

PM -HF

I started in PE post GFC and now work as a PM at a HF. Comp trajectory:

Y1: 150k

Y2: 200k

Y3: 280k

Y4: 300k

Y5: 350k

Y6: 420k

Y7: 550k

Y8: 1.65M

Y9: 1.07M

Y10: 2.67M

Y11: 4M

Y12: 3.6M

Fuck you deep in your pass-index underperforming asshole. 

[Comment removed by mod team]
[Comment removed by mod team]
[Comment removed by mod team]

Went from an analyst at an independent sponsor to equity partner once we raised a fund. Got paid pretty low for years but stuck it out.

Hours have gotten slightly better but control over my hours and being able to plan my days out have become significantly better

Decided to stay in banking because I enjoyed my team, overall liked how the first couple years had gone and did not view finance as something I wanted to do forever. So figured I’d make as much as possible over the next ~5 years then leave, and banking is what would let me do that. I did talk to a number of analysts that I had started with (i.e. 2nd and 3rd years when I was a 1st year) who went to the buy-side, and I felt banking was a better pathway for my current interests and goals

Figured I'd throw mine in as well:

A1: ~$165k: $85k base (moved to $90K in January which explains the odd bonus amount) + $57k bonus + $15k signing bonus

A2: $232k: $100k base + $92k bonus + $20k one-time COVID retention bonus + $20k Associate promote incentive bonus

Assoc1: $325k: $150k base (moved to $175K in January) + $160K bonus

He became lead engineer at one of the best firms after 6 years. It is definitely not typical for tech. Also worth noting that Y1 was in Utah while the rest of his roles were in Cali so I would not use $80k as the starting figure.

Array

Could you talk abit more about why you decided to transition to a SWF post MF PE? And how have you found the investing experience so far vs MF PE?

Sure. I decided to move out of MF PE as I had no interest in pursuing an MBA in the US or Europe, which was a requirement to progress my career to the VP level at the PE fund. Most others MF PEs with offices in my country asked for that but the SWF I work for did not have that requirement. I also considered some MM and LMM PE funds but the offers could not compare to the SWF in terms of deal flow, capital to invest, brand name and compensation. I was motivated to join as part of a new division growing rapidly in my region and globally inside the fund. AuM in the division and in my regional team grew by 3x and 5x respectively since I joined, while maintaining very healthy IRRs.

The direct investing process now is very similar to what I did before at the MF, although I am in a very different sector. Nevetheless, the internal approval process is quite different and the organization itself moves more slowly. I have been enjoying it though, people are much more friendly, hours are super reasonable unless when in a live deal, but even then rarely work more than 70h/weeks and can't complain on compensation. No carry though, which stinks, but you can't have everything in life.

Year 1: 60,000

Year 2: 62,750

Year 3: 63,037 (pissed off, started job hunting)

Year 4: 100,000 + bonus (new job in boutique IB)

Should have gone to IB at the start. I was scared of the lack of work life balance so I decided to choose working at a Big 4. Behold, I still had to work long hours and I wasted 3 years of comp opportunity cost that could have saved me up a house deposit.

Career IB out of undergrad

AN1: 70 + 50 = 120k (+10 signing)

AN2: 80 + 65 = 145k

AN3: 90 + 90 = 180k

AS0: 50 + 50 = 100k for 6 months (+40 retention)

AS1: 140 + 185 = 325k

AS2: 150 + 150 = 300k

VP1: 170 + 205 = 375k

VP2: 175 + 300 = 475k

VP3: 200 + 325 = 525k

D1: 225 + 725k = 950k

D2: 275 + 1,225k = 1.5m

MD1: 350 salary

Vertigo

Career IB out of undergrad

AN1: 70 + 50 = 120k (+10 signing)

AN2: 80 + 65 = 145k

AN3: 90 + 90 = 180k

AS0: 50 + 50 = 100k for 6 months (+40 retention)

AS1: 140 + 185 = 325k

AS2: 150 + 150 = 300k

VP1: 170 + 205 = 375k

VP2: 175 + 300 = 475k

VP3: 200 + 325 = 525k

D1: 225 + 725k = 950k

D2: 275 + 1,225k = 1.5m

MD1: 350 salary

Congrats on making MD. Guessing boutique or independent based on base salaries?