BB/EB 2nd year analyst exits

2nd year analyst about to leave my BB/EB firm. How did PE recruiting go for your analyst class?


Great to hear about the one-off person going to BX / KKR / TPG / APO, but more interested in knowing what the overall distribution of outcomes was for your bank or group.


How many going to MF PE, MM PE, staying A2A, going to corporate, etc


Would be good to get data points at places other than the GS TMT / PJT RX groups, as we know the placements are top there anyways.

75 Comments
 
Most Helpful

GS 2nd year leaving. Counting down the days until I can leave. Happy with my outcome but paid for it in blown up weekends and stress.

TLDR is the analysts with HYPW, 3.9+ GPA, school investment club backgrounds usually placed into MF / UMM if they really wanted it, but most others ended up in MM with a few going UMM / Growth / VC.

GS TMT:

Thoma Bravo, H&F, TPG, Vista, CD&R, Silver Lake, Apax, Franciso Partners, Permira

Corporate exits to strategic finance roles at public SaaS companies, CXO roles at tech startups, nepo babies leaving finance altogether

Basically no one A2A for a reason. Combination of lifestyle and the exits available

GS FIG:

H&F, Carlyle, Apollo FIG, CD&R, WP

Rest is mostly UMM / MM FIG PE, some HFs, Corp Dev

GS Industrials

CD&R, Apollo, WP, KPS, Bain

A couple A2A, some who quit before their 2 years were up, most leaving to UMM / MM PE

GS Healthcare:

A ton of MF / UMM, albeit only in healthcare to my knowledge. Otherwise some growth / VC, almost no one going A2A

GS Consumer:

Weakest exits of the GS Classics. Maybe 1 or 2 MF, rest going UMM / MM, and scattered A2A or corp dev

 

Were the tech start up CXOs founders / friends of founders? Otherwise, not usually a viable option for legit start ups unless I've been living under a rock. Curious to hear more for sure...might change my career plans

 

MS

M&A / Menlo had the best exits

Followed by M&C / Industrials

Then HC / P&U

 

JPM

BX, CD&R (2), GA, Advent, Berkshire, AmSec, AEA, THL, MDP, Audax

Sprinkled MM PE across groups with a few cool Startup / Corp Dev roles

MF exits most concentrated within M&A, HC, and FIG (all FIG specific roles)

 

PJT M&A exits were lackluster this year. Whether it’s analyst quality or HH willingness to give you MF opps idk but not up to par with what I’ve seen at other EBs

 

Bump. Guess this really shows that even at the top groups, the median / 75th percentile exit is not a megafund 

 

Evercore

KKR, TPG, Warburg, Advent, Veritas, Silver Lake, CD&R, Providence, Distressed HFs

Best exits across Tech / Industrials

Average analyst going to MM PE
Average target school, in a good group, who put the required hours in landed UMM / MF

Semi / Non-target analysts had a much worse go at recruiting, even though analyst quality is roughly equal across the firm regardless of undergrad

 

Any color on RX placements and how they compared to the rest of Evercore? Guessing the distressed funds were mostly RX, but historically Apollo has taken from RX

 

According to a friend, below are 1AN exits so far. Not familiar with the departing class, but I’d assume exits are comparable.

2 APO PE, KKR PE, H&F PE, Bain Cap PE, 2 Centerbridge

 

Seems like everybody wants to get in here and pat themselves on the back about how hard it is to get a seat at a good fund nowadays. News flash: the amount of MF associate jobs has probably 4x'd in the last decade (double the amount of funds hiring double the amount of associates). If you expand it out to amount of quality MM or better associate seats (stable, real PE funds with latest fund of 1bn+) I would guess its more than 10x'd over the last decade. 

It's easier than ever to get a PE seat. If you're at an EB / BB and can't get a quality MM+ offer, it's almost certainly your fault. If you're at a top group at an EB / BB and and can't get a UMM+ offer, it's also almost certainly your fault. Everyone that's actually been an analyst post-covid at a top group can tell you that everyone in their class that was competent and really wanted a good PE seat got one.   

 

Probably will get some MS for this but I don’t think this take is completely accurate.

I work at a top bank and will be exiting to a desirable UMM firm in the coming months.

From my anecdotal experience recruiting, I do think there was an over indexing towards identity-based hiring.

For example, woman in my group and I were recruiting at the same time, same background, but were given wildly different interviews from recruiters. She would consistently flop in interviews at top MFs and talk about it openly, only for the HH we were both working with to give her an additional interviews not offered to me.

She landed one of those jobs (after openly talking about performing poorly in the interview) and will be joining a top fund this summer. But as it sits currently, she is actively not staffed due to incompetence and would not be given an offer to stay on / get promoted at our firm.

I’m not saying this looking for pity, if you work hard, you can land a great offer and I’m pumped about mine. Additionally, this is one individual. I work with and know plenty of women and people who would qualify as “diversity candidates” that I have the utmost respect for and they deserve every opportunity that comes their way. I’m just saying the playing field has been skewed in recent years, and it’s a bit rich to say that more seats = easier than ever to get a job.

 

Voluptatum facilis saepe vel cumque. Nihil culpa in assumenda sed veniam aliquam. Sequi qui iusto dolorum eius earum. Aut ex saepe illum magni quas. Et perspiciatis deleniti quaerat pariatur molestiae adipisci. Hic atque laudantium fugit recusandae iusto suscipit et.

Est ut eius laboriosam hic. Voluptatem et dolor iure magni dolores minus beatae. Aut nihil voluptates harum quo porro. Et porro est ratione aut necessitatibus. Natus ducimus cupiditate alias.

 

Et hic praesentium est quo qui distinctio. Sint molestias laborum sequi blanditiis perspiciatis veritatis. Optio vel est corporis accusantium odio nulla vitae.

Sit labore aspernatur quo aliquam quaerat libero porro porro. Quo consequatur dicta fugit beatae rerum distinctio quod. Fuga nemo ut adipisci excepturi voluptatum hic. Est quia esse quae mollitia ipsam. Corrupti illum nihil molestias earum excepturi.

Est iste facere consectetur est commodi. Distinctio nihil sunt cumque quia modi. Quo ut quis quaerat ratione. Voluptatem ut similique dolore quis aperiam.

Eum assumenda perspiciatis ullam ut rem excepturi quo quia. Fugit consequatur eos in tenetur unde nobis voluptatem excepturi. Nihil quod sint nihil. Molestias dolores et nam animi.

 

Aliquam incidunt similique qui voluptas. Facilis numquam necessitatibus qui saepe minus. Dolore ut vel dignissimos veniam molestias et voluptatem. Quia impedit facilis vero asperiores vel fuga excepturi eos.

Quam consequatur quia eum. Est atque nemo ipsa non necessitatibus aperiam libero. Id voluptatum unde ad suscipit saepe.

Atque voluptate aperiam eveniet non aut. Incidunt earum ex ullam culpa in a unde. Nihil nihil et quas.

 

Dolore aperiam nobis esse. Aut aliquam iure dignissimos amet ut. Et consequatur et quod atque.

Nemo explicabo molestiae explicabo quaerat ea deleniti. Porro totam reiciendis rerum non qui porro. Nam sed veritatis odit qui autem. Ullam nihil quam nam facilis non.

Repellendus laudantium numquam laboriosam ipsam aliquid rerum. Vero ea doloremque ea rerum. Ipsa animi aut laudantium aliquid iusto.

Inventore ut recusandae illo quasi qui molestiae iure. Et asperiores asperiores corrupti molestiae pariatur ratione. Et voluptatibus nostrum sint quod voluptatem cupiditate non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (356) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”