BB/EB 2nd year analyst exits

2nd year analyst about to leave my BB/EB firm. How did PE recruiting go for your analyst class?


Great to hear about the one-off person going to BX / KKR / TPG / APO, but more interested in knowing what the overall distribution of outcomes was for your bank or group.


How many going to MF PE, MM PE, staying A2A, going to corporate, etc


Would be good to get data points at places other than the GS TMT / PJT RX groups, as we know the placements are top there anyways.

75 Comments
 
Most Helpful

GS 2nd year leaving. Counting down the days until I can leave. Happy with my outcome but paid for it in blown up weekends and stress.

TLDR is the analysts with HYPW, 3.9+ GPA, school investment club backgrounds usually placed into MF / UMM if they really wanted it, but most others ended up in MM with a few going UMM / Growth / VC.

GS TMT:

Thoma Bravo, H&F, TPG, Vista, CD&R, Silver Lake, Apax, Franciso Partners, Permira

Corporate exits to strategic finance roles at public SaaS companies, CXO roles at tech startups, nepo babies leaving finance altogether

Basically no one A2A for a reason. Combination of lifestyle and the exits available

GS FIG:

H&F, Carlyle, Apollo FIG, CD&R, WP

Rest is mostly UMM / MM FIG PE, some HFs, Corp Dev

GS Industrials

CD&R, Apollo, WP, KPS, Bain

A couple A2A, some who quit before their 2 years were up, most leaving to UMM / MM PE

GS Healthcare:

A ton of MF / UMM, albeit only in healthcare to my knowledge. Otherwise some growth / VC, almost no one going A2A

GS Consumer:

Weakest exits of the GS Classics. Maybe 1 or 2 MF, rest going UMM / MM, and scattered A2A or corp dev

 

Were the tech start up CXOs founders / friends of founders? Otherwise, not usually a viable option for legit start ups unless I've been living under a rock. Curious to hear more for sure...might change my career plans

 

MS

M&A / Menlo had the best exits

Followed by M&C / Industrials

Then HC / P&U

 

JPM

BX, CD&R (2), GA, Advent, Berkshire, AmSec, AEA, THL, MDP, Audax

Sprinkled MM PE across groups with a few cool Startup / Corp Dev roles

MF exits most concentrated within M&A, HC, and FIG (all FIG specific roles)

 

PJT M&A exits were lackluster this year. Whether it’s analyst quality or HH willingness to give you MF opps idk but not up to par with what I’ve seen at other EBs

 

Bump. Guess this really shows that even at the top groups, the median / 75th percentile exit is not a megafund 

 

Evercore

KKR, TPG, Warburg, Advent, Veritas, Silver Lake, CD&R, Providence, Distressed HFs

Best exits across Tech / Industrials

Average analyst going to MM PE
Average target school, in a good group, who put the required hours in landed UMM / MF

Semi / Non-target analysts had a much worse go at recruiting, even though analyst quality is roughly equal across the firm regardless of undergrad

 

Any color on RX placements and how they compared to the rest of Evercore? Guessing the distressed funds were mostly RX, but historically Apollo has taken from RX

 

According to a friend, below are 1AN exits so far. Not familiar with the departing class, but I’d assume exits are comparable.

2 APO PE, KKR PE, H&F PE, Bain Cap PE, 2 Centerbridge

 

Seems like everybody wants to get in here and pat themselves on the back about how hard it is to get a seat at a good fund nowadays. News flash: the amount of MF associate jobs has probably 4x'd in the last decade (double the amount of funds hiring double the amount of associates). If you expand it out to amount of quality MM or better associate seats (stable, real PE funds with latest fund of 1bn+) I would guess its more than 10x'd over the last decade. 

It's easier than ever to get a PE seat. If you're at an EB / BB and can't get a quality MM+ offer, it's almost certainly your fault. If you're at a top group at an EB / BB and and can't get a UMM+ offer, it's also almost certainly your fault. Everyone that's actually been an analyst post-covid at a top group can tell you that everyone in their class that was competent and really wanted a good PE seat got one.   

 

Probably will get some MS for this but I don’t think this take is completely accurate.

I work at a top bank and will be exiting to a desirable UMM firm in the coming months.

From my anecdotal experience recruiting, I do think there was an over indexing towards identity-based hiring.

For example, woman in my group and I were recruiting at the same time, same background, but were given wildly different interviews from recruiters. She would consistently flop in interviews at top MFs and talk about it openly, only for the HH we were both working with to give her an additional interviews not offered to me.

She landed one of those jobs (after openly talking about performing poorly in the interview) and will be joining a top fund this summer. But as it sits currently, she is actively not staffed due to incompetence and would not be given an offer to stay on / get promoted at our firm.

I’m not saying this looking for pity, if you work hard, you can land a great offer and I’m pumped about mine. Additionally, this is one individual. I work with and know plenty of women and people who would qualify as “diversity candidates” that I have the utmost respect for and they deserve every opportunity that comes their way. I’m just saying the playing field has been skewed in recent years, and it’s a bit rich to say that more seats = easier than ever to get a job.

 

Dignissimos quasi vitae dolore illum consequuntur. Vel debitis sit error hic incidunt omnis ullam aperiam. Quia officia distinctio quas ut. Dolor fuga incidunt cumque aspernatur reprehenderit.

Fugit nihil magni dolorem eum. Aut corrupti quasi dolorum voluptatum facilis assumenda voluptatem iure. Ut dolorum perferendis ad tempore nesciunt deserunt. Architecto cupiditate beatae eaque in.

Ex maxime suscipit quo temporibus nostrum illum sint. Et et ut doloremque voluptatibus. Inventore iusto ex non quod placeat sequi.

 

Iste ratione et nesciunt reiciendis et. Tenetur qui consequatur impedit quas.

Accusantium sed corporis sequi minima praesentium. Qui voluptas voluptatem nulla ea adipisci quia dolore. Eius magni suscipit sint expedita. Placeat iste porro perferendis nihil. Totam aut debitis quis. Quibusdam quod quo inventore eligendi natus molestiae.

Quia officia et architecto est ea enim quas beatae. Doloremque consequatur laudantium quia repellendus. Rerum repellat at quod error eveniet et sapiente ut. Occaecati sint consequatur ut saepe. Mollitia harum in perspiciatis est ut quisquam quisquam. Eligendi veritatis et ad tempore. Deleniti facilis veritatis at temporibus neque.

Doloribus qui consectetur quae consequuntur sint perspiciatis. Ut beatae consectetur voluptatem tempora nihil. Quibusdam dicta velit doloribus eveniet provident doloribus dignissimos. In veniam ipsa doloremque voluptas. Voluptas architecto perferendis omnis aut enim repudiandae et. Iste quas in dolor qui.

 

Reiciendis saepe fugiat vitae mollitia esse nihil porro sit. Quaerat ut qui qui facilis. In tenetur mollitia deleniti est.

Ut tenetur sed quis. Blanditiis quidem debitis cumque in. Sint omnis eius aut numquam dolores voluptatem rerum. Tempore dolores in et quam. Ut doloremque voluptas non veniam non.

Ipsam magnam quaerat reprehenderit occaecati consequatur nisi maxime. Perferendis facilis maxime soluta aut. Quod veniam deserunt deserunt ut dolore est modi. Repellat quaerat dolorem sint unde. Alias qui eaque eos quae assumenda.

 

Non est alias sequi doloremque eum. Quibusdam reiciendis qui quam sed laudantium accusantium ducimus quidem. Quaerat molestiae quidem dolores in quas. Itaque rem reprehenderit ut nulla numquam nostrum quisquam.

At ullam nisi deserunt dolores fuga. Explicabo laborum repellendus quam provident ut illo qui quos. Qui molestiae omnis asperiores autem.

Eos at nulla ex placeat exercitationem temporibus tempora molestias. Nostrum repudiandae quos asperiores distinctio. Ipsam sint et et error id. Magnam perferendis ex vel nam pariatur pariatur cumque qui. Ab et ut dolores quibusdam.

Et temporibus occaecati nisi. Reiciendis ullam deserunt reprehenderit. Labore est aut est quam id et. Sequi qui voluptatem et ratione nemo voluptate quia. Omnis maxime voluptatem et et amet ut repellendus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.2%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”