166 Comments
 

The only correct answer

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
Controversial

Not sure if this is a troll, but I’ll take the bait. Chase Coleman is a glorified lax bro who has ridden coat tails his whole life. Daddy was a big time lawyer, was friends with Julian Robertson’s kids which led to a position at Tiger. Not saying he’s a dumbass by any means, but he’s more of a guy that was in the right place at the right time. He got in early in tech, but as far as actual alpha generation he is not outstanding. More so just factor exposure and putting on beta.

 

YLSGUY

D1 capital, altimeter and Melvin are better investors

Welp so much for Gabriel after this last Q lmao

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Is that not literally the definition of investing . Predicting the outcome of an asset/class without complete certainty based on limited information.

Not trying to be facetious genuinely curious.

 

The real answer. If we are qualifying "greatest investor" as ability to consistently generate uncorrelated, stable excess returns at reasonable size, this is at good as it gets (except maybe the guys at TGS)

"one for the money two for the better green 3 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine" - M.F. Doom
 

It was pretty clear most of the guys the author interviewed for the book were annoyed with Simons/Rentech. The key folks (Brown, Mercer and other scientists) understandably stayed quiet. Although he got Elwyn Berkelamp to talk (before his death in 2019) which was pretty cool.

 

Such an underrated comment and investor. That rate at which that man compounded capital for 30+ years...

I'm long everything he touches

“When you pull on that jersey, the name on the front is a hell of a lot more important than the name on the back"
 

kinda meaningless to ask who is the greatest investor without setting parameters for "greatness". Is greatness returns for clients as a % or $ over last 5/10 years? Greatness meaning personal net worth? Greatness as defined in risk-adjusted returns? How do you evaluate all the long tech/short retail Tiger guys who don't care about factor exposure? Only public markets? Only equities? 

But since everyone is just picking out their favorite billionaires who match their investing styles (or who these posters want to be when they "grow up") - I'd put Tepper, Singer up there.

 

It really depends on the asset class, there are many different lanes in investing. 

If you look at real assets/PE I would say Bruce Flatt is by far the greatest investor ever, and you cannot compare % returns because the size of the wallet is a huge determinant in liquidity and flexibility. 

Speculator: Soros

General investor: Say what you want about him but Bill Ackman can take this spot

Debt: Howard Marks 

I think Buffett is not the greatest "investor", but he arguably has the best "businessman" ever. 

 

in terms of returns/wealth, it's going to most definitely be an entrepreneur like Bezos or Jobs

if you're talking about people who run money professionally, it's likely edward thorp, seth klarman, jim simons, or someone else that most people don't have access to, didn't quit like druckenmiller or lynch or robertson, and have compounded 20%+ net of fees for at least 30 years

if you're talking about pure returns but not an entrepreneur, I'd be willing to bet it's a VC's GPs. the CAGR from pre-IPO to something like GOOG/FB has got to be insane, but I don't think those returns are published anywhere, and LPs' returns which may be public are most certainly less

it's not warren buffett, most of his and ben graham's CAGR came from one concentrated bet in GEICO, ditto for Phil Fisher (the abominable Ken Fisher's father), and if someone doesn't have a 20y track record at least, I don't think they deserve consideration as greatest investor ever

 

last I checked Klarman was still compounding at >20%/yr even considering recent underperformance. I don't fault lynch or robertson for closing, but if you're going to have the title of greatest investor ever, I appreciate someone like klarman, thorp, or simons who's gotten great returns for longer than the 13y lynch did and however long the others did. druckenmiller probably deserves more credit than I'm giving him, he compounded 30%/yr for 30 years when he closed the fund, I don't think anyone but ed thorp has gotten close to that

 

Literally no one that was listed above, except Jim Simons.  Everyone else is a great salesman.  The best investor I ever came across as an LP is a guy no one on here has prob ever heard of - Henry Ellenbogen.  Ran the T. Rowe New Horizons fund for about ten years and runs his own shop now.  

 

C'mon...the durable guys? The greatest investor ever? 

.tb_button {padding:1px;cursor:pointer;border-right: 1px solid #8b8b8b;border-left: 1px solid #FFF;border-bottom: 1px solid #fff;}.tb_button.hover {borer:2px outset #def; background-color: #f8f8f8 !important;}.ws_toolbar {z-index:100000} .ws_toolbar .ws_tb_btn {cursor:pointer;border:1px solid #555;padding:3px} .tb_highlight{background-color:yellow} .tb_hide {visibility:hidden} .ws_toolbar img {padding:2px;margin:0px}
 

tmike425

I'm tempted to say David Tepper just because I admire how ballsy he is. Outside of him though I think Dan Loeb is very good at being flexible and opportunistic in terms of strategy and keeping up with the times and I think its why he's outlasted many of his value/event driven peers 

Dan Loeb's returns have been garbage post GFC. Third Point is like a lot of hedge funds in the market that have been around since the 90s. Loaded up and made great returns (which is what really influences those "since inception" returns). Then blew up like the rest of the market in the GFC, then have under-performed since. I've seen the numbers and... meh.

This is not to pick on Dan or his shop or people who work there, many of whom have made a lot of money for themselves, but to make the point that a lot of high profile funds haven't had that great of track records. I've seen the numbers and especially when factoring in the volatility based on the strategy they run, they ain't great by any means. Great marketers with loyal LPs? Yes. Especially given that plenty of LPs are starstruck and want to meet the billionaire and figure they have other line items (ie other funds) they need to worry about cutting/trimming.

I used to do Asia-Pacific PE (kind of like FoF). Now I do something else but happy to try and answer questions on that stuff.
 

The numbers in the off shore presentation look a lot better than "meh" to me. I think relative to King Street, Perry, Eton Park, Einhorn and even Tepper and Klarman he's certainly held up decently strong post GFC. I think beyond the performance I'm just happy to see him embracing GAARP, venture, etc. in a way that people like Einhorn and a lot of the other old school value guys are too stubborn to. All that said, I'm a long term fanboy of his so I admit to my bias. 

 

i think key test will be whether they're able to time exit from the factor correctly when market changes - will differentiate those who can actually add value thru factor timing vs lucky bozos 

 

Interesting topic, probably everyone had a similar discussion with their buddies.

I have 3 names (all 3 already mentioned above) for 3 different categories.

a) Soros - in the pure trading / speculating category, to me he is the epitome of wall street "speculator investor"

b) Simons - if looking just returns, he is the best, simple. As said, the man solved the market. But I would see RenTech not as just as fund, but some kind of laboratory that can build a supercomputer, and if they did not do investing, they could do some other mind-blown thing.  Thus is would categorize Simons as "mathematician"

c) Buffett - besides all obvious, if looked strictly monetarily he is the most successful - x times than both Simons and Soros who are about his age - of course, everyone had different path etc. But that is exactly why it can be argued that he is the best - he is in it to make money, what investing is all about. If Soros is "speculator", and Simons  "mathematician", Buffett would be "businessman". Someone who knows American business as good as anyone, and is making money by being business owner.

 

Most of these names (Soros, Simons, Robertson, Coleman) are more platforms and managers than the best investors.

For example, do you really think that Soros is a better investor than Druckenmiller?  No shot.

 

Really just seems like some abstract gatekeeping of the word "investor".  All the people you named run or ran money and came up with their own investment theses and individual ideas.  A trader/speculator/gambler or whatever you want to call them is still just a synonym to investor in my books.

Further I would say that building a fund and framework, and imparting that framework on others so that they can continue is not a mark against these investors, but another notch on their belt.  Its not like now that these guys are less actively involved the strategies have changed completely, but instead you can see that they have developed winning cultures, and platforms that can continue to invest successfully.  

 

Your point is valid, but I think nuance matters here.  You are incorporating a lot of skills into best investor or best trader and a lot are about managerial and business attributes.  It's kind of naive to think the same people are the best at all.  What tends to happen is that there is some aspect of the business that they are excellent at and then are smart and good enough at others.  But you need to be truly excellent at something. Jack of all trades doesn't really work.

 

true but marrying bezos def more of a high flyer growth investment imo 

 

It is actually astounding to me how many people here comment Mackenzie Bezos in a more or less derogatory manner. She literally left DE Shaw with Jeff and was one of two employees from day 1 and was an intregral part of building arguably the greatest company in the world today.

Put some respect on her name because Amazon as is today likely does not exist without her contributions and shes probably a more capable investor than a large majority of users on here. Clowns on here act like she just sat on her ass for that shit when in reality shes probably a cold blooded killer at what she does.

 

Yea so people were saying she's a PE investor. LBOed Jeff, managed cash flows, post-acquisition transform, neat exit. 100% IRR

 

In my humble opinion; Bill Ackman.

He may not have the cleanest success rate out of a majority of names mentioned below but Ackman is a living legend.

He’s failed and failed again and each time he’s gotten back up. He got royally, I mean totally screwed in his Herbalife short and didn’t let it break him.

His short in march of 2020 will go down in History. 2.6B overnight...

Bill Ackman is a legend, and although debatable I think he’s the GOAT.

 

In my humble opinion; Bill Ackman.

He may not have the cleanest success rate out of a majority of names mentioned below but Ackman is a living legend.

He’s failed and failed again and each time he’s gotten back up. He got royally, I mean totally screwed in his Herbalife short and didn’t let it break him.

His short in march of 2020 will go down in History. 2.6B overnight...

Bill Ackman is a legend, and although debatable I think he’s the GOAT.

 

so basically he's notable for an extremely volatile portfolio?  

 

In my humble opinion; Bill Ackman.

He may not have the cleanest success rate out of a majority of names mentioned below but Ackman is a living legend.

He’s failed and failed again and each time he’s gotten back up. He got royally, I mean totally screwed in his Herbalife short and didn’t let it break him.

His short in march of 2020 will go down in History. 2.6B overnight...

Bill Ackman is a legend, and although debatable I think he’s the GOAT.

 

Scott Schleifer. Got to hear him speak on a webinar last spring and he explained in very understandable terms his investing strategy and perspective. Guy is doing something right since Tiger Global cleans house. He's obsessed with compound interest and talked about making 20% any way possible. It's not rocket science but the guy came across as a total beast. 

 

how do you come across as a beast?  damn I wish I was in that webinar. 

 

Delectus voluptatem sapiente cumque. Quo pariatur minima laboriosam cum. Et sequi minima perspiciatis enim.

Perferendis ea ducimus sed dolor quia enim sapiente. Rem at hic quo. Ad blanditiis praesentium quos magni explicabo. Totam quia voluptas ut porro.

Dolores nisi minima cum totam qui quia. Et nesciunt debitis cum veniam asperiores. Et est error in laboriosam animi ipsam. Quod vitae voluptatum neque aut. Qui id omnis eum culpa. Expedita maxime id ratione. Qui placeat sed voluptatem qui.

 

Odit iste placeat numquam accusamus earum. Ut vel sunt quia adipisci. In voluptatem omnis suscipit voluptatem aut.

Amet voluptatem corrupti debitis qui quo voluptates odio. Iste qui in dolorem amet culpa. Non voluptate est et similique veniam nam dolorum. Quo earum laborum consequuntur. Corporis sed ipsam itaque ipsa quibusdam qui tempora sint. Dolorum cumque molestiae adipisci quis sit ducimus omnis qui.

Distinctio expedita rerum repudiandae quod aliquid fugit eos. Et quis nam cumque quasi cumque molestiae. Sint itaque voluptatibus qui quas deleniti aliquam quia. Illum aut sed enim illum reprehenderit recusandae ad suscipit. Odit magnam nisi aut omnis et porro magnam possimus.

 

Reiciendis reiciendis omnis culpa earum aspernatur. Sint amet culpa consectetur recusandae assumenda debitis qui. Nulla nostrum enim ut perspiciatis et debitis tenetur distinctio. At quos quibusdam occaecati voluptas vero suscipit.

Aut ipsam mollitia sit distinctio commodi qui recusandae. Suscipit esse libero aut blanditiis totam ad. Non totam sint illum maxime quae. At est est occaecati ratione. Aut asperiores ab voluptatum repellat quam minus quia distinctio. Est omnis numquam corrupti sint veniam accusamus. Aspernatur reiciendis et at cupiditate quis sequi et.

Consequatur neque assumenda est vel aut. Minus aspernatur repellendus et in. Laborum asperiores ipsum provident fugit soluta quam assumenda.

 

Perferendis possimus facere unde quo. Explicabo saepe occaecati id consectetur culpa. Voluptas non atque aut qui laudantium. Dolorem sequi exercitationem mollitia non quod et similique.

Molestiae eum enim ratione eum. Voluptatibus inventore tempore inventore sed facere. Officiis accusantium doloribus accusamus ut aperiam qui nobis.

Qui nihil id sed rerum quaerat. Ut quia illum suscipit sed consequuntur sed in. Accusamus ut enim doloribus enim rerum. Est molestias consectetur nihil earum culpa est perferendis.

Ducimus nihil qui eos. Possimus quos quia pariatur molestiae repellat voluptatem mollitia. Veritatis nesciunt quo voluptas ea velit sit sit.

 

Occaecati aut illo nostrum excepturi et sed. Ut maiores amet dicta et deleniti veritatis ut aliquid. Sint sunt corporis ipsa eaque. Ad quo ab quis.

Esse ipsam autem voluptas. Ullam ea quam optio. Eligendi eum deserunt dolor ipsum exercitationem aut. Quia aspernatur blanditiis sunt similique tempora.

Ducimus eveniet aut et. Totam quos nemo quos et et tenetur doloremque. Sunt qui occaecati praesentium est rerum in quam. Cumque repellendus dolore nihil voluptatem. Dolorem nesciunt ut laborum officia. Vitae et sed modi et blanditiis error.

Quia sed qui voluptas assumenda sed aut. Veritatis iusto unde perferendis accusamus. Perferendis excepturi dolorem porro pariatur consequatur id. Omnis alias placeat labore.

 

Distinctio neque aspernatur maxime vel soluta dolor. Quaerat illo laborum facere impedit voluptatem quaerat minus. Eveniet est laudantium omnis quos iusto.

Exercitationem enim rerum sed unde iusto. Non aut sed aut autem et quas ipsa. Harum ipsam quisquam eos. Praesentium voluptatem quibusdam quasi aspernatur voluptatem quo.

Et rerum et tenetur placeat. Eum magnam doloribus fuga in praesentium. Iure dolores et nisi fugiat dolorem sed esse. Qui deserunt voluptatibus ea. Laudantium ipsum temporibus et veritatis at enim in.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.1%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Millennium Partners 95.0%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.1%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.2%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.2%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (12) $423
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (86) $288
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $192
  • Analysts (242) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (282) $96
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”