75 Comments
 

Guys, chill with the downvotes. I was asking a legitimate question... Sorry for using term "prestigious". I've changed it to "best" because i'm genuinely curious.

Array
 

This is one of many reasons, but read following from Reuters:

"The U.S. Treasury Department has hired Wall Street bankers and lawyers to advise on providing tens of billions of dollars in aid to the airline, cargo and defense sectors, people familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

The appointments come after U.S. lawmakers approved a $2.2 trillion stimulus bill last week to mitigate the economic fallout of the coronavirus pandemic, which has killed more than 5,000 people in the United States and shut down large swathes of the country's economy.

PJT Partners Inc will advise the Treasury on its negotiations with the airlines, the sources said. The stimulus bill, known as the CARES Act, provides for up to $50 billion in aid to airlines, half of it in loans and loan guarantees and half of it in grants.

 

overall for analyst experience and exits its probably MS M&A. GS TMT is also very good but caveat is you could get stuck only doing capital markets vs M&A. GS FIG is very good too. I think others have a better view on boutiques than I do

“If you ain’t first, you’re last!” - GOAT
 

Goldman is the most active bank, all of their groups have a ton of activity. the thing is though that a lot of their groups are split into capital markets and M&A. so you could be in TMT but only do ecm / dcm

“If you ain’t first, you’re last!” - GOAT
 

GS FIG does the most M&A work in proportion to the other groups at GS, due to the unique nature of FIG companies (not as much ECM activity and little to no DCM since FIG companies are already highly levered through deposits, policy liabilities, etc.)

 

not even true.. MS M&A has such a strong history of sending kids to amazing places that headhunters automatically trust the group. PJT RSSG is great too at that point what's the point of even comparing? Senior leadership at most PE/HFs are almost all from GS/MS, if that tells you anything.

 

There's so much misinformation going around this forum that I decided to chime in. If you were in a classic coverage group at GS and wanted to only work on M&A deals, you can just by maintainin a good relationship with the bum.

Source: Ex-GS IBD Classic Analyst

 

My rough impression having been a generalist for a bit of who you do not want to be pitching against (can only speak from a business perspective, not a comp/exit opps/culture one):

FIG - GS Consumer - GS/MS Tech - GS Media - MS/Moelis Telecom - ? Know nothing M&A - MS (though caveat that most of the top EBs and GS have industry groups execute) HC - JPM Industrials - All of GS/MS/JPM and many of the EBs cover this well, very broad space Sponsors - MS/CS? - Also tough to pin down because it can vary significantly from bank to bank in terms of what the group does. Could be just making lists of companies in some and more execution/leverage finance in others Restructuring - PJT Power & Utilities - Barclays O&G - ? Know nothing

 

how would u say the HC group in Menlo for EVR compares to GS HC? I've heard EVR is really strong in that space too so would u put them on GS level?

 

Not on GS level at all. Something to note whenever people talk about any groups (but even moreso relevant for healthcare) is the VERTICAL. For instance, Centerview absolutely kills it in pharma and no one doubts that, but they can't say the same for medtech, services, HCIT, etc.

Back to your question, I'm assuming Menlo EVR HC would only focus on biotech / life sciences given the location. They're solid in the space but by no means at the top (GS / Centerview / JPM / MS all are better)

 

Truthfully just don't know enough about Moelis to put them on here (not in either a negative or positive way). 

It does seem like Moelis is just absolutely solid all around, but not sure if they would be a clear-cut industry #1 (or even 2/3) for any sector. Seems like their strategy the past few years has been to focus the majority of their time on smaller deals (e.g. sub $1bn), so maybe this plays a role? Tbh not entirely sure and don't want to say something that isn't true. 

 

Veritatis delectus dolorem nulla mollitia cum molestiae voluptatum. Aliquid temporibus magnam nam porro dolor accusamus. Voluptas quaerat quam voluptatem eos reiciendis. Dolorem nihil ipsam molestias aut amet.

Quaerat quaerat at nostrum dolores nobis quibusdam aspernatur. Illum nobis aspernatur quo eveniet. Nam omnis ipsam vel repellat. Delectus facilis rerum pariatur. Et aliquam at tempora id.

Cumque explicabo tenetur fugiat. Nihil et sed dolorem et quis est dolor quia. Et laboriosam qui tempora sint. Sequi quaerat eligendi facilis debitis. Tenetur ut non incidunt aperiam tempore repellat odio.

 

Laudantium porro qui vero sint. Cum aut deserunt ipsam fuga quidem voluptatem a. Ducimus assumenda tempora quis ut dolorum reprehenderit. Expedita ex voluptatem exercitationem quas provident fuga. Itaque sed eos vitae omnis enim a.

Omnis iste quam quae accusamus molestias veritatis. Omnis exercitationem quaerat aut alias laborum cumque et reprehenderit. Alias inventore consequatur autem non doloremque quia beatae. Quibusdam veritatis voluptatem et soluta quaerat voluptatum. Dolor possimus commodi quo a ut rerum et. Neque veritatis quae est provident consectetur placeat assumenda. Est neque culpa et non omnis ut voluptates.

Voluptatem numquam explicabo consequatur eligendi maiores impedit laborum. Soluta eos aut ut aut cupiditate. Non nam dignissimos ea ad. Reprehenderit accusamus in alias et soluta rerum.

 

Qui recusandae eos doloribus sint magnam corporis quis. Nostrum exercitationem et exercitationem animi dolore esse. Omnis ea doloribus ut aut at ut soluta. Quis culpa deleniti magni et. Dolores eos amet nesciunt voluptas vitae.

Nihil in rem dolores quis. Ut dolorum atque ullam et numquam provident est. Blanditiis iure dolore eaque aut minima. Aut repellat sapiente dolorem. Nisi ad necessitatibus atque et praesentium fugiat.

Accusamus quis voluptas adipisci sunt id excepturi iste. Voluptatem labore qui quae deleniti ex nihil quis. Doloremque quo maxime delectus dolore rerum occaecati.

Praesentium consequatur illum expedita velit velit perspiciatis. Eos reiciendis nam porro magni est perspiciatis non. Nihil sed voluptas delectus quia a ut. Consectetur cumque adipisci recusandae tempore est et vel. Ab velit reprehenderit velit laborum. Qui quod eveniet beatae rerum. Et omnis deserunt quasi repudiandae nulla possimus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”