Told you, you’re going to lose your job to AI pt. 2

Remember me, the quant you said was schizoposting about AI on here. Hope you all are enjoying ChatGPT. Give it 3 more years and 4 more iterations and none of you will have jobs. Anyone except for MDs will be dumped for AI. But yea, I guess you guys were right, I don’t know what I’m talking about.

 

No profession is immune from this ChatGPT devil

Do you know that ChatGPT can build statistical arbitrage and machine learning models using Python upon simple prompts ? And it can continuously improve and tune its own ML models ?

ChatGPT can even write advanced algorithm such as dynamic programming and dijkstra. And it can even design reinforcement learning model when itself is a RL model !!!

No-one is immune from this ChatGPT thing, INCLUDING the researchers and engineers who gave birth to it !!!

Get ready, ChatGPT is coming for us all. 

 

I agree.  I’ve played around with its ability to write algorithmic trading scripts.  It’s not great.  But it understands how to.  I think everybody might be fucked.  There’s no telling how fast it will be capable of improving and building upon previous knowledge.  Musks talks about making the X app, the app for all social media.  There’s a chance this is just X.  Capable of doing everything anywhere all at once.  

 

Quants who build strategies off of publicly available markets data would be the first to go. OP sounds like he’s projecting. He’s afraid for his own job which is going to be on the chopping block first. Any client-based industry will be safe for a long time due to all the client interaction and nuances in the task that need to be addressed. 

Array
 

If AI is so smart, why can’t they tell a motorcycle and bicycle apart? Yes, you hear me right. AI can have a hard time figuring it out. Another thing, creativity come from randomness and AI can only mock the randomness but not be true randomness. Machine learning is simply processing information that is available and combining one piece with another. Machines don’t “know” what they are doing. They only do it bc of a “random” code commanding them to do so. Yes I work in IB. But I studied CSE and I know what I am talking about

 

I have the same background as you (did both BS and MS in CS), and all my professors would agree with you. Currently, all the "AI" coming out is using supervised learning. Nothing is even close to being intelligent

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Even more ignorant to assume sell-side won't recruit down and lower pay. IB, and PE, is not rocket science, there is no reason why people from tier 10 schools won't do it for half the salary, whilst remaining perfectly capable of the alleged soft skills. Moores law and all that. 

 
Controversial

The comment highlights that fact you think doing grunt work at William Blair counts as investment banking.

"IB Is overkill" - I said they would hire down, and that a tier ten university student could do the work you describe (but have never carried out yourself). my comment still stands. Why would top tier candidates want to continue doing grunt work in excel and ppt when every other profession will use AI to do that? It REDUCES the value proposition for candidates, therefore lesser candidates will step up. Hello? any one home?

"Restaurants will have no waiters" - I didn't say that in any way, shape or form, straw-man. But, your logic is still flawed, you think that because in 20-30 years 90% of restaurants will use robots and 10% human waiters, that means AI will not take ANY jobs? ahahaha wtf is your point with this example

"Self driving cars" - a Decade or two decades from now, it doesn't matter, you will will still be working and self driving cars will be mainstream. therefore by your logic AI will be advanced enough to do anyones jobs.

Of course you know better than Sequoia, McKinsey and Deloitte working at a cringe growth equity shop.

https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/generative-ai-a-creative-new-world/

 

While I agree that the OP's is a very poor take, we should remember that up-skilling yourself can only be helpful. Yes, IB is fundamentally a sales job at the higher level, but using technology will become even more important, especially to drive business faster and execute even faster at all levels.

My MD once told me back in the day (~15+ years ago), it could take them a day to do an indexed EV/ NTM EBITDA evolution chart, which now you can do in a few minutes. You won't lose your job to AI, but could lose it to the colleague who knows how to use AI better.

 

Why is it every time some moron makes this uneducated take, you can just tell that they are some high school or college student that can’t even land an internship in tech let alone a job?? How much do you want to bet OP here is just some college sophomore that can barely pass their intro classes?? 
 

If you actually worked with technology, you would realize how minuscule of a chance there is that any of us will get replaced. I always say one of the least important parts of the job of a software engineer is coding. 
 

Hell, just ask ChatGPT if it’ll fully replace us and see what it says, genius. 

 

Sophomore in CS and Finance, so take everything I say with a grain of salt as I have no real world experience. That being said I think people are blissfully ignorant to how dangerous this technology is.  OP is definitely trying to get a rise out of people on this forum by saying they won’t have jobs.  But realistically, it won’t just be IBankers, it could very well be everybody.  This ChatGPT and other AIs, will improve at exponential rates and eventually reach a point where they are capable of improving themselves. We are playing with fire.  

 

We aren’t playing with fire, the only things technology will allow junior bankers to do is make things faster for them, that is all, so at best it going forward if tech evolves junior bankers Would have to work less…it took a week or so do to a dcf back than now it takes a day or so ish so you get the point

 

Completely understand where your coming from.  I’m not referencing IB specifically.  As with most technologies, starting from point 0 and going to point 1 takes a very long time.  But going from point 1 to point 2 takes significantly less time.  And so on and so forth.  AI may develop so quickly that by the time it is viable to be put into use by Investment Banks, it may be capable of engineering an entirely new, more efficient financial system as a whole.  I don’t think anybody will be first to lose their jobs.  It’ll probably just be everyone at once.  

 

Haha - you greatly underestimate senior bankers’ creativity in creating work. Jr hours were suppose to go down after all of the various tech innovations over the years - virtual data rooms, excel, internet / big data tech platforms. But all that has changed is that the workload has gotten larger and more complicated, the hours and headcount has stayed the same 

 

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Can it write good code when given instruction? Absolutely. But can it actually design a strategy or predict the future? No.

When is apparent to most in the space is that all these LLMs are fundamentally ill suited towards any real forecasting problem. Anytime youre modeling a distribution and subsequently looking to estimate a point on it, you are either interpolating (the value lies within the bounds of the set of points used to train the model) or extrapolating ( the point lies outside the bounds of said set).

Any sort of forecast is inherently extrapolation, which is a MUCH harder task, and most very large NN models have shown to be pretty ill suited for this. Keep in mind, all machine learning is a compression problem: how do I take a ton of data, and express as accurately as possible within a models parameters. When the target value (ie a response to a question / conversation / etc) is within (or roughly within) the set of data being compressed, you can do an incredibly good job of getting a good output. When it isn't, things break down.

"one for the money two for the better green 3 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine" - M.F. Doom
 

I fucking hate when tech people insist that the world of finance will collapse over AI and banks would simply be black boxes of AI systems talking to each other. 

Its such a stupid take I am astonished it comes up so often, the only finance adjacent industry where this may happen is LS Prop investing. 

A lot of bankers jobs centers around relationships and relationship building, we are still humans at the end of it all and no one wants to go golfing with ChatGPT to discuss the possible pricing of merger, yes ChatGPT will probably have the most accurate scenario's but banking is actually centered around a lot of human elements, RenTech posted astounding returns for years and years yet its business model bankrupt GS/MS/JPM and even regional boutiques.

Finance isn't all about stock market and investment returns believe it or not and a lot of the people making these AI posts seem to fail to realize that, hell most of us hate talking to an automated Voice program when calling to make a complaint or whatever and I am certain for centuries to come humans will feel more comfortable moving around money in institutions with Analysts up to MD than just throwing it into whatever blackbox computer program that is out then.

These are the same people that insisted that Crypto will destroy fiat currency failing to take into account that humans trust governments more than instagram bros especially when most people can see a majority of crypto is a big ponzi scheme where the early investors incentivize new capital by bragging about crazy returns. 

 

Ut eos a quia nulla dolorem. Consequuntur tempore totam autem temporibus eligendi molestias amet. Nesciunt voluptatem autem perspiciatis numquam architecto qui ut.

Quia expedita necessitatibus veniam dolores temporibus. Fuga recusandae quis quis ratione animi est. Est quidem et est id perspiciatis. Aliquid voluptates eos consequatur iure rem. Ut provident quis sit cupiditate.

Officiis sed consectetur vel facilis aut asperiores. Ratione ea voluptatum quia dolores quis et.

Array
 

Laborum numquam nobis possimus velit quis expedita. Placeat enim consectetur distinctio doloremque. Quia nobis ad dolorum illo. Qui beatae quia nihil et omnis.

Maiores ipsa voluptas totam sequi enim excepturi. Consectetur velit maiores ad quis perferendis. Aut minima enim blanditiis ipsam suscipit quo aut. Omnis id et aut nulla. Illo laboriosam sint distinctio veniam est nobis.

Fugiat placeat esse vel omnis quidem ut vitae. Necessitatibus beatae exercitationem doloribus harum ad animi soluta. Nesciunt incidunt minus iusto quia delectus. Pariatur dicta in eum vel eos. Iure expedita suscipit aspernatur exercitationem autem et.

 

Officia et sunt aliquam laudantium numquam distinctio consectetur. Eligendi nisi accusantium quia aut temporibus. Repellendus rerum atque voluptas natus distinctio qui.

Eos sint quis hic quibusdam repellat laboriosam. Id voluptatem voluptas voluptatum et aut sed. Rerum explicabo sunt doloremque exercitationem aut ut veniam. Nesciunt dicta cumque atque est possimus.

Nulla vel qui voluptatem a velit inventore. Aliquid nam sunt est. Nesciunt officiis aut totam maxime. Error quasi tempora eum blanditiis voluptas debitis commodi. Maiores quisquam quia ut quaerat consequatur et. Eum consequatur modi qui nulla qui impedit. Dolores velit quia vitae itaque aperiam.

Quia ea ducimus laborum cum. Dolores dicta vero sunt nostrum ullam quasi deserunt. Inventore nobis enim nemo vero voluptate maxime laborum. Inventore tempora harum dolores soluta. Eligendi eum molestias a quae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”