Best Chicago IB Offices-Updated

I know this topic has been discussed before but that was when Lehman was still around. I was wondering if ppl familiar with the area/banks would mind discussing which BB's (for IBD) in chicago are the best? Additional info about how big the offices are/hours/whether or not they execute from the office would be helpful too.

 

cs is defninitely not "shitty" in chicago

ubs used to be one of the top chicago offices a couple years back but has lost a lot of talent

baml does not have a major presence in chicago, and anyone who puts them above cs clearly doesn't know the region

 

william blair is a top shop in chicago. as for the sizes, they are nowhere near the size of new york and maybe not the same as san fran as san fran has the whole tech presence, but they are decent sized. its a bit different in chicago than say new york, but the work life balance is a tad bit better...a tad bit. but you will most likely have better deal flows in nyc than anywhere else, that is what matters.

 

No need for a second opinion, you need a first one because almost everything in this thread is completely wrong.

Historically, there are 3 BB powerhouses in Chicago: GS, CS and UBS. All three have seen key people leave in the past year or so - BDT from GS, AN from CS, CK and JG from UBS. Given the slew of defections, UBS is in pretty bad shape, they have been bleeding people for a while. GS and CS are still tops in Chitown, been doing pretty big deals. They both went into the downturn strong and didn't fire as many people, held onto a lot of bodies. Positioned them well when things came back. GS does industrials, paper & packaging, etc. CS does a lot of services, less industrials, some international stuff. UBS does a lot of the heavy industrials, diversifieds, typical midwestern names that you would expect to be covered out of Chicago.

Culturally, GS and CS are both pretty midwestern and laid back. When BDT left GS, he bought everyone in the office (including admins) a Cartier or IWC watch. That should tell you that they care about their people. I heard that CS did great at placement this year.

UBS has more of the old DLJ culture because they soaked up a lot of those people back in 03/04 when they split off from CSFB. MDs that own clubs, directors doing blow, things of that nature. People have the swagger, but they've been dipping out. Hours are pretty bad.

JPM gutted their office in the downturn. Haven't heard much about it since. Citi has been doing pretty well, they were trying to poach people from boutiques, the analysts there have been getting absolutely destroyed. They do a lot of metals and mining which is hot right now. BAML is mostly a pitching outpost, they have some consumer and industrials, couple other people scattered around. The old Lehman Chicago office was tiny, something like 10 heads, now Barclays is trying to build a practice off that. They hired some people that got canned at CS in the downturn, trying to build up a practice in education. MS had a mass exodus of analysts and associates, when that happens, that says something. DB is a pretty small office, heard they were down to one analyst at some point.

In terms of bodies, BMO might be the biggest in Chicago (even bigger than the BBs). Probably around 100 bodies or maybe more. Blair is pretty sizable too. Both are pretty good places to work, although exit ops are definitely weaker than BBs. Baird is similar too, a bit smaller. I would consider the three as comparable but Blair as the best. Lazard does auto, kind of a weird office, works a lot. Don't know much about Greenhill. Moelis was a tiny outpost the last time I heard anything, but it probably has been somewhat more populated by now.

 
endlessrain:
No need for a second opinion, you need a first one because almost everything in this thread is completely wrong.

Historically, there are 3 BB powerhouses in Chicago: GS, CS and UBS. All three have seen key people leave in the past year or so - BDT from GS, AN from CS, CK and JG from UBS. Given the slew of defections, UBS is in pretty bad shape, they have been bleeding people for a while. GS and CS are still tops in Chitown, been doing pretty big deals. They both went into the downturn strong and didn't fire as many people, held onto a lot of bodies. Positioned them well when things came back. GS does industrials, paper & packaging, etc. CS does a lot of services, less industrials, some international stuff. UBS does a lot of the heavy industrials, diversifieds, typical midwestern names that you would expect to be covered out of Chicago.

Culturally, GS and CS are both pretty midwestern and laid back. When BDT left GS, he bought everyone in the office (including admins) a Cartier or IWC watch. That should tell you that they care about their people. I heard that CS did great at placement this year.

UBS has more of the old DLJ culture because they soaked up a lot of those people back in 03/04 when they split off from CSFB. MDs that own clubs, directors doing blow, things of that nature. People have the swagger, but they've been dipping out. Hours are pretty bad.

JPM gutted their office in the downturn. Haven't heard much about it since. Citi has been doing pretty well, they were trying to poach people from boutiques, the analysts there have been getting absolutely destroyed. They do a lot of metals and mining which is hot right now. BAML is mostly a pitching outpost, they have some consumer and industrials, couple other people scattered around. The old Lehman Chicago office was tiny, something like 10 heads, now Barclays is trying to build a practice off that. They hired some people that got canned at CS in the downturn, trying to build up a practice in education. MS had a mass exodus of analysts and associates, when that happens, that says something. DB is a pretty small office, heard they were down to one analyst at some point.

In terms of bodies, BMO might be the biggest in Chicago (even bigger than the BBs). Probably around 100 bodies or maybe more. Blair is pretty sizable too. Both are pretty good places to work, although exit ops are definitely weaker than BBs. Baird is similar too, a bit smaller. I would consider the three as comparable but Blair as the best. Lazard does auto, kind of a weird office, works a lot. Don't know much about Greenhill. Moelis was a tiny outpost the last time I heard anything, but it probably has been somewhat more populated by now.

Some great information in this post. I have interviewed at a few Chicago groups, but ended up taking an offer in NY.

GS- Was an awesome place. Heard great things about their dealflow there and they fully execute out of there. They told me recently where thier analysts placed and I was impressed. Some top megafunds as well as MM PE. MS- Didnt interview here but Ive been hearing of a ton of analysts/associates leaving for w/e reason. Citi- Interviewed here and heard that their Industrials group is here, one of Citi's top groups. Nice guys. Analysts placed well in megafunds and HF. Didnt hear too much of KKR/Blackstone, but more along the lines of TPG, THL etc.

Ultimately took a GS, MS, JPM offer in NY but heavily considered JPM, GS, and Citi. The chicago people were so much nicer than their counterparts in NY.

 
1styearanalyst1:
GS- Was an awesome place. Heard great things about their dealflow there and they fully execute out of there. They told me recently where thier analysts placed and I was impressed. Some top megafunds as well as MM PE. MS- Didnt interview here but Ive been hearing of a ton of analysts/associates leaving for w/e reason. Citi- Interviewed here and heard that their Industrials group is here, one of Citi's top groups. Nice guys. Analysts placed well in megafunds and HF. Didnt hear too much of KKR/Blackstone, but more along the lines of TPG, THL etc.

Ultimately took a GS, MS, JPM offer in NY but heavily considered JPM, GS, and Citi. The chicago people were so much nicer than their counterparts in NY.

So does GS take first year analysts? I've heard a lot that they require analysts to do a year in NY and then a year in Chicago?

Anyone have more info on that?

 

Good post endlessrain. One additional note... Greenhill's Chicago office was essentially formed when Lehman went through the crisis. GT (the long time head of Lehman's Chicago office, although he wasn't technically the office head the last couple of years), DJ, and CR left Lehman for Greenhill and took a handfull of VPs, associates, and analysts with them.

 
vintagelemon:
thanks so much! anyone know the average size of a chicago BB like goldman or ms?

Not sure about average size, but during recruiting last year at Booth CS said they're the largest BB in the city (there are Chicago-based MM that tend to be larger, think Blair, BMO, etc) and they have around 45-50 people. I would think GS, UBS, JPM, and MS are in the ~40 range. Barcap might be a bit smaller as they're still trying to build up. BAML and Citi don't have a big presence.

I know it's not quite BB (but considered on the same level), but Lazard has a strong restruturing practice based out of Chicago, and if you include acquisitions (lazardmm.com), it's def a strong player in the city.

 
sonibubu:
vintagelemon:
thanks so much! anyone know the average size of a chicago BB like goldman or ms?

Not sure about average size, but during recruiting last year at Booth CS said they're the largest BB in the city (there are Chicago-based MM that tend to be larger, think Blair, BMO, etc) and they have around 45-50 people. I would think GS, UBS, JPM, and MS are in the ~40 range. Barcap might be a bit smaller as they're still trying to build up. BAML and Citi don't have a big presence.

I know it's not quite BB (but considered on the same level), but Lazard has a strong restruturing practice based out of Chicago, and if you include acquisitions (lazardmm.com), it's def a strong player in the city.

Friend said that 3 ex UBS big hitters came to Citi in Chicago and their office is extremely solid with kids going to TPG, THL, etc afterwards. Another buddy works at CS in the same building, extremely solid exit opps as well.

 

Blair is considered to be a very strong i-bank w/ top notch talent. In terms of compensation, it's considered to be on par with NY bulge brackets. This is a big deal since going to a BB in Chicago typically means a pay cut in year end bonuses.

On top of that, Chicago is obviously a much cheaper city, where you could get a nice 1 bedroom that is five blocks away from work for $1300.

 

CS and UBS have the largest offices in numbers in the Chicago area and therefore command the most absolute deal flow. GS is strong but it's a much leaner office. Per banker I think GS has just as much deal flow as the other two, but GS does defer a few of their deals to NY. In addition, all analysts in the GS office are 2nd year or above, so many of them bring deals they were staffed on from NY to the Chicago office when they move. CS and UBS operate pretty autonomously and source, staff and execute their own deals.

 

is BAML good or not in Chi? endlessrain mentioned that it's mostly a pitching post and random bankers together, but i read elsewhere on wall street oasis (from older posts though) that BAML is really strong in chi, esp. in consumer/retail? Anybody else have any experience/thoughts on this?

 

Iure ratione quia et impedit esse nihil pariatur fugit. Dolores eos quidem ipsum sunt dicta. Reiciendis ut vel ut non.

Eaque omnis sunt aliquid et voluptatem tempora laudantium. Dolorem culpa corrupti omnis pariatur voluptates velit. Expedita nisi nemo dolores ut voluptatibus. Optio facilis similique velit dolorem consequatur consequatur dolorem.

Eos ex et id dolorem minima qui. Minus consequatur nihil eligendi voluptate repudiandae.

Sunt qui enim numquam error. Ipsum eos enim quos odit. Libero nostrum debitis fugiat odio. Ipsa hic similique illo aut error.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”